Ahn, W., & Kalish, C. W. (2000). The role of mechanism beliefs in causal reasoning. In F. C. Keil, & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 199–225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54, 299–352.
Amsel, E., Langer, R., & Loutzenhiser, L. (1991). Do lawyers reason differently from psychologists? A comparative design for studying expertise. In R. J. Sternberg, & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 223–250). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Anderson, J. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Biswas, G., Schwartz, D., Bransford, J. D., & The Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt (2001). Technology support foor complex problem solving: From SAD environment to AI. In K. D. Farbus, & P. J. Feltovoch (Eds.), Smart machines in education: The learning revolution in educational technology. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.
Brewer, W. F., Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2000). Explanation in scientists, children. In F. C. Keil, & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 279–298). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bullock, M., Gelman, R., & Baillargeon, R. (1982). The development of causal reasoning. In W. Friedman (Eds.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 209–254). New York: Academic Press.
Bunge, M. (1979). Causality and modern science (3rd ed.). New York: Dover Publications.
Carey, S. (1995). On the origin of causal understanding. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 268–302). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Carey, S. (2002). The origin of concepts: Continuing the conversation. In N. L. Stein, P. J. Bauer, & M. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Representation, memory, and development: Essays in honor of Jean Mandler (pp. 43–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to casation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104(2), 367–405.
Cheng, P. W., & Nisbett, R. E. (1993). Pragmatic constraints on causal deduction. In R. E. Nisbett (Eds.), Rules for reasoning (pp. 207–227). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99(2), 365–382.
Corrigan, R., & Denton, P. (1996). Causal understanding as a developmental primitive. Developmental Review, 16, 162–202.
de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computers simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179–201.
Fugelsang, J. A., & Thompson, V. A. (2003). A dual-process model of belief and evidence interactions in causal reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 31(5), 800–815.
Glennan, S. (2002). Rethinking mechanistic explanation. Philosophy of Science, 69, S342–S353.
Graesser, A. C., Baggett, W., & Williams, K. (1996). Question-driven explanatory reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, S17–S31.
Graesser, A. C., Langston, M. C., & Lang, K. L. (1992). Designing educational software around questioning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3, 235–241.
Graesser, A. C., Swamer, S. S., Baggett, W. B., & Sell, M. A. (1996). New models of deep comprehension. In B. K. Britton, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guenther, R. K. (1998). Human cognition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hagmayer, Y., & Waldmann, M. R. (2002). How temporal assumptions influence causal judgments. Memory and Cognition, 30(7), 1128–1137.
Hedstrom, P., & Swedberg, R. (Eds.). (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Hogan, K., & Thomas, D. (2001). Cognitive comparisons of students’ systems modeling in ecology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 319–345.
Howard, R. A., & Matheson, J. E. (1989). Influence diagrams. In R. A. Howard, & J. E. Matheson (Eds.), Readings on the principles and applications of decision analysis (pp. 721–762). Menlo Park, CA: Strategic Decisions Group.
Hume, D. (1739/2000). A treatise of human nature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hung, W., & Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Conceptual understanding of causal reasoning in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 1–21.
Jonassen, D. H. (2004). Learning to solve problems: An instructional design guide. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer/Jossey-Bass.
Jonassen, D. H. (2006a). On the role of concepts in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 54(2), 177–196.
Jonassen, D. H. (2006b). Facilitating case reuse during problem solving. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning. 3, 51–62.
Kant, I. (1996). Critique of pure reason. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company (Translated by Werner S. Pluhar; Original work published in 1781).
Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.
Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Koslowski, B., Okagaki, L., Lorenz, C., & Umbach, D. (1989). When covariation is not enough: The role of causal mechanism, sampling method, and sample size in causal reasoning. Child Development, 60, 1316–1327.
Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, D. (2002). What is scientific reasoning and and how does it develop. In U. Goswami (Eds.), Handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 371–393). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). Connecting scientific reasoning and causal inference. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5(2), 261–288.
Mahoney, J. (2001). Beyond correlational analysis: Recent innovations in theory and method. Sociological Forum, 16(3), 575–593.
Marini, M. M., & Singer, B. (1988). Causality in the social sciences. Sociological Methodology, 18, 347–409.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Printice-Hall.
Patel, V. L., Arocha, J. F., & Zhang, J. (2005). Thinking and reasoning in medicine. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (Vol xiv, pp. 727–750, 858). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Rapus, T. L. (2004). Integrating information about mechanism and covariation in causal reasoning. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65(2-B), 1047.
Rehder, B. (2003). Categorization as causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 27(5), 709–748.
Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Salmon, W. C. (1989). Four decades of scientific explanation. In P. P. Kitcher, & W. C. Salmon, (Eds.), Scientific explanation: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 13, pp. 3–219). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Schlottmann, A. (2001). Perception versus knowledge of cause and effect in children: When seeing is believing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(4), 111–115.
Sembugmorthy, V., & Chandrasekeran, B. (1986). Functional representations of devices and compilation of diagnostic problem-solving systems. In J. Kolodner, & C. K. Riesbeck (Eds.), Experience, memory, and reasoning (pp. 47–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shapiro, B. R., van den Broek, P., & Fletcher, C. R. (1995). Using story-based causal diagrams to analyze disagreements about complex events. Discourse Processes, 20, 51–77.
Steyvers, M., Tenenbaum, J. B., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Blum, B. (2003). Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions. Cognitive Science, 27(3), 453–489.
Thagard, P. (2000a). Probabilistic networks and explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1(1), 91–114.
Thagard, P. (2000b). Explaining disease: Correlations, causes, and mechanisms. In F. C. Keil, & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 254–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Verschueren, N., Schroyens, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2004). The interpretation of the concepts ‘necessity’ and ‘sufficiency’ in forward unicausal relations. Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain and Cognition, 14(3), 1–28.
Waldmann, M. R., & Hagmayer, Y. (2001). Estimating causal strength: The role of structural knowledge and processing effort. Cognition, 82(1), 27–58.
Waldmann, M. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition In Proceedings of the twelfth annual cognitive science society (pp. 190–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrnce Erlbaum Associates.
Waldmann, M. R., Holyoak, K. J., & Fratianne, A. (1995). Causal models and the acquisition of category structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 181–206.
Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1998). Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. In W. Damon, D. Kuhn, & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception and language (pp. 523–573). New York: Wiley.
White, P. A. (1989). A theory of causal processing. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 161–188.
Yoon, W. C., & Hammer, J. M. (1988). Deep-reasoning fault diagnosis: An aid and a model. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18(4), 659–676.
Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99–149.