Skip to main content


Log in

Informal science learning experiences for gender equity, inclusion and belonging in STEM through a feminist intersectional lens

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript


In this paper, the authors seek to analyze the perceptions, motivations and experiences of young women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education projects aiming to incentivize gender equity, based on the theoretical framework of feminist studies on science and intersectionality, as well as academic literature on equity and inclusion in science communication. The following question was considered: How does experience in these projects influence young women’s perceptions of belonging in the STEM fields? Working from a qualitative, content analysis approach, the authors conducted 73 questionnaires, 20 interviews, and 4 focus groups with 25 young women who participated in 4 projects developed in public schools in low-income settings in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The authors categorized the experience of these young women in their individual dimension–regarding motivations, interests, science identity and future career prospects; family dimension–encouragement and recognition from family members and parents’ beliefs and expectations; educational dimension–recognition by the school community, improvement in school performance, and intervention in school spaces; project dimension–representativeness of gender, race, class, and location, development of self-esteem and self-confidence, building of a sense of belonging, and active learning methodologies; and social dimension–domestic work in their daily lives and experiences of discrimination based on gender, race, class and location. The authors argue that such projects become “counter-spaces” in which marginalized young women find spaces of resistance and possibility, based on the unique position they occupy and, through feeling included and belonging, can claim their rightful presence from an intersectional perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Akotirene, C. (2019). Interseccionalidade. Pólen Produção Editorial LTDA. ISBN 978–85–98349–69–5.

  • Archer, L., Godec, S., Calabrese Barton, A., Dawson, E., Mau, A., & Patel, U. (2021). Changing the field: A Bourdieusian analysis of educational practices that support equitable outcomes among minoritized youth on two informal science learning programs. Science Education, 105(1), 166–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avraamidou, L. (2020). Science identity as a landscape of becoming: Rethinking recognition and emotions through an intersectionality lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badinter, E. (1985). Um amor conquistado: o mito do amor materno. In Um amor conquistado: o mito do amor materno (pp. 370–370).

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (2017). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Interpersonal development.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biroli, F. (2016). Divisão sexual do trabalho e democracia. Dados, 59, 719–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brah, A. (2006). Diferença, diversidade, diferenciação. Cadernos pagu, 26, 329–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2010). A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science: Using practice to inform theory. In P. Stout (Ed.), Communicating science. UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin’! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 37–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese Barton, A., Kim, W. J., & Tan, E. (2020). Co-Designing for rightful presence in informal science learning environments. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 6(2), 285–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2020). Beyond equity as inclusion: A framework of “rightful presence” for guiding justice-oriented studies in teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 49(6), 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese Barton, A., Greenberg, D., Kim, W. J., Brien, S., Roby, R., Balzer, M., & Archer, L. (2021). Disruptive moments as opportunities towards justice-oriented pedagogical practice in Informal Science Learning. Science Education, 105(6), 1229–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canfield, K., & Menezes, S. (2020). The state of inclusive science communication: A landscape study. Metcalf Institute, University of Rhode Island.

  • Canfield, K. N., Menezes, S., Matsuda, S. B., Moore, A., Mosley Austin, A. N., Dewsbury, B. M., & Taylor, C. (2020). Science communication demands a critical approach that centers inclusion, equity, and intersectionality. Frontiers in Communication.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazelli, S., Marandino, M., & Studart, D. (2003). Educação e comunicação em museus de ciência: aspectos históricos, pesquisa e prática. Educação e Museu: a construção social do caráter educativo dos museus de ciências. Rio de Janeiro: FAPERJ, Editora Access. ISBN: 8586575445

  • Cazelli, S., Coimbra, C. A. Q., Gomes, I. L., & Valente, M. E. (2015). Inclusão social e a audiência estimulada em um museu de ciência. Museologia & Interdisciplinaridade, 4(7), 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, V. S. (2019). Faz todo sentido biológico? Mulheres, (homens) e ciências nas textualidades do canal Nerdologia. (Tese de Doutorado). Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas (FAFICH). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação Social.

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. u. Chi. Legal f., 139.

  • Dawson, E. (2017). Social justice and out-of-school science learning: Exploring equity in science television, science clubs and maker spaces. Science Education, 101(4), 539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, E. (2019). Equity, exclusion and everyday science learning: The experiences of minoritised groups. Routledge. ISBN 9780367662158.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2015). Gendered socialization of STEM interests in the family. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2), 116–132.

  • Fontanetto, R. M. B. (2021). Divulgação Científica e Gênero: o olhar de jovens mulheres para a temática mulheres nas ciências em vlogs. 238 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Divulgação da Ciência, Tecnologia e Saúde) – Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Casa de Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro.

  • Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, J. M., & Porche, M. V. (2014). Perceived gender and racial/ethnic barriers to STEM success. Urban Education, 49(6), 698–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1993). A instabilidade das categorias analíticas na teoria feminista. Estudos Feministas.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (1989). Choosing the margin as a space of radical openness. Framework The Journal of Cinema and Media, 36, 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H., Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., Simpkins, S., Rhee, H. Y., & Turner, C. (2019). How do middle school girls of color develop STEM identities? Middle school girls’ participation in science activities and identification with STEM careers. Science Education, 103(2), 418–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarides, R., & Ittel, A. (2015). Gendered Motivation and Choice in STEM-Individual and Contextual Factors. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2), 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaper, C. (2015). Do I belong?: Gender, peer groups, and STEM achievement. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2), 166–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewenstein, B. (2019). The need for feminist approaches to science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 18(4), C01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugones, M. (2014). Rumo a um feminismo descolonial. Revista Estudos Feministas, 22, 935–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilomba, G. (2020). Memórias da plantação: episódios de racismo cotidiano. Editora Cobogó. ISBN 9788555910807.

  • Lima, B. S. (2013). O labirinto de cristal: as trajetórias das cientistas na Física. Revista Estudos Feministas, 21, 883–903.

  • Marandino, M., Selles, S. E., & Ferreira, M. S. (2009). Ensino de Biologia: histórias e práticas em diferentes espaços educativos. São Paulo: Cortez. ISBN 9788524915307.

  • Massarani, L., & Moreira, I. D. C. (2016). Science communication in Brazil: A historical review and considerations about the current situation. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 88, 1577–1595.

  • Moreira, I. (2006). A inclusão social e a popularização da ciência e tecnologia no Brasil. Inclusão Social, 1(2).

  • Norberto Rocha, J., Fernandes, M., & Massarani, L. (2021). Social models of disability and museum research: Inclusion and accessibility in science museums: Voices from Brazil. In Theorizing Equity in the Museum (pp. 128–140). Routledge.

  • Oliveira, E. R. B. D., Unbehaum, S., & Gava, T. (2019). A educação STEM e gênero: uma contribuição para o debate brasileiro. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 49, 130–159.

  • Ong, M., Smith, J. M., & Ko, L. T. (2018). Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 206–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W. R. (2017). Research–practice partnerships as a strategy for promoting equitable science teaching and learning through leveraging everyday science. Science Education, 101(4), 520–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plan Brasil. (2013). Por ser menina no Brasil – crescendo entre direitos e violências. Pesquisa com meninas de 6 a 14 anos nas cinco regiões do Brasil. Resumo executivo.

  • Polino, C. & Castelfranchi, Y. (2019). Percepción pública de la ciência en Iberoamérica. Evidencias y desafíos de la agenda de corto plazo. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad –CTS (42), 115–136.

  • Rainey, K., Dancy, M., Mickelson, R., Stearns, E., & Moller, S. (2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznik, G. (2021). Percepções de meninas sobre ciência, cientistas e feminismo em projetos de ciências exatas no Estado do Rio de Janeiro. In: Seminário Internacional Fazendo Gênero 12, 2021, Florianópolis. Seminário Internacional Fazendo Gênero 12 (Anais Eletrônicos). ISSN 2179–510X

  • Rosa, K., & Mensah, F. M. (2021). Decoloniality in STEM research:(re) framing success. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(2), 501–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, L., London, B., Levy, S. R., & Lobel, M. (2011). The roles of perceived identity compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex STEM program at a co-educational university. Sex Roles, 65(9), 725–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, L. (2001). O feminismo mudou a ciência? Bauru, SP: EDUSC.

  • Sígolo, V. M., Gava, T., & Unbehaum, S. (2021). Equidade de gênero na educação e nas ciências: Novos desafios no Brasil atual. Cadernos Pagu.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solorzano, D., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, J., & Watt, H. M. (2013). Perception shapes experience: The influence of actual and perceived classroom environment dimensions on girls’ motivations for science. Learning Environments Research, 16(2), 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Contending with a stereotype: African-American intellectual test performance and stereotype threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellhed, U., Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2017). Will I fit in and do well? The importance of social belongingness and self-efficacy for explaining gender differences in interest in STEM and HEED majors. Sex Roles, 77(1), 86–96.

  • YESTEM Project Team. (2021). YESTEM Insight 2: What are Core Equitable Practices in informal STEM learning?

Download references


The first author thanks the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for their doctoral grant, and Fulbright for the Doctoral Dissertation Research Award. The second author thanks the CNPq for the Productivity Scholarship 1B and the Rio de Janeiro Research Foundation Carlos Chagas Filho (FAPERJ) for the Scientist of Our State. The authors are grateful for the reflections of and dialogue with the researchers of the MSTEM-RJ network, from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. This study was held in the scope of Brazil’s National Institute of Public Communication of Science and Technology, with the support of CNPq and FAPERJ.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriela Reznik.

Additional information

Lead editor: Silvia Lizette Ramos de Robles.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reznik, G., Massarani, L. & Calabrese Barton, A. Informal science learning experiences for gender equity, inclusion and belonging in STEM through a feminist intersectional lens. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 18, 959–984 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: