Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Intra-action analysis of emergent science phenomena: examining meaning-making with the more than human in science classrooms

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The More Than Human (MTH; Bang and Marin 2015) world is often considered passive and neutral, not implicated in meaning-making in science classrooms. Through this framing, learning spaces are considered the backdrop upon which learning occurs, where the goal of science teaching is to explain why or predict how science phenomena-assumed as static reproducible facts-occur. In this paper, I examine the MTH’s role as deeply implicated in meaning-making in middle school science lessons. Set in a private rural school just outside Chennai—a large city in South India—the story I tell weaves together meaning-making around microbes in three different grade eight biology class sections with three different teachers. Through analysis of classroom interactions informed by Indigenous (Bang and Marin 2015) and feminist new materialist (Barad 2007) theories, I develop ‘intra-action analysis’ methods to trace unfolding meaning-making intra-actions across the three lessons, focusing on relations as the unit of analysis. In doing so, in each lesson I illustrate microbes as phenomena that were entangled with(in) human-MTH relations in the present, past, future and imagined space-times. Through this work I offer intra-action analysis as one way to ‘see’ how human-MTH entanglements shape meaning-making and school science phenomena. I argue for science educators to shift how we understand and study meaning-making intra-actions from a humanist perspective to recognizing the MTH world as in learning spaces. Future implications include educators shifting our focus from learning about a static ‘other’ to recognizing science learning as youth engaging in and with the MTH, examining the world in its’ emergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All names are pseudonyms. Lead editor: Anita Hussénius

  2. Transcribed using Jeffersonian conventions (Jefferson, 1983).

References

  • Achieve, I. (2017). Using phenomena in NGSS-designed lessons and units. Achieve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bang, M. (2020). Learning on the move toward just, sustainable, and culturally thriving futures. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1777999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2015). Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bang, M., Marin, A., Medin, D., & Washinawatok, K. (2015). Chapter fourteen - learning by observing, pitching in, and being in relations in the natural world. In: M. Correa-Chávez, R. Mejía-Arauz, & B. Rogoff (Eds.). Advances in Child Development and Behavior. 49 303–313. Seattle: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.10.004

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cajete, G., & Bear, L. L. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence (Vol. 315). Clear Light Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cįmer, A. (2007). Effective teaching in science: A review of literature. Journal of Turkish science education, 4(1), 20–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikmenli, M. (2009). Biology student teachers’ ideas about purpose of laboratory work. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching (Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 1–14). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.

  • Ellingson, L. L., & Sotirin, P. (2020). Making data in qualitative research: Engagements, ethics, and entanglements. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (2004). Demystifying data construction and analysis. Anthropology Education Quarterly, 35(4), 486–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (revised). Continuum.

  • Gee, J. P. (2004). An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203005675

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. F., Sapp, J., & Tauber, A. I. (2012). A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals. The Quarterly review of biology, 87(4), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1086/668166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. Forms of talk (pp. 124–159). University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2017). Co-Operative Action. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, N. (1997). If this were played upon a stage: school laboratory work as a theatre of representation. Deakin Centre for Education and Change, Faculty of Education, Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., & Stevens, R. (2015). Interaction analysis approaches to knowledge in use. In A. A. DiSessa, M. Levin, & J. S. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction A synthetic agenda for the learning sciences (pp. 72–108). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies, 14(3), 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, L., Hardman, M., Noakes, J., & Wegerif, R. (2018). Making the case for a material- dialogic approach to science education. Studies in Science Education, 54(2), 141–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1598036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1983). Issues in the transcription of naturally-occurring talk: Caricature versus capturing pronunciational particulars (p. 34). Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature. Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalthoff, H., & Roehl, T. (2011). Interobjectivity and interactivity: Material objects and discourse in class. Human studies, 34(4), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9204-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamoorthy, R., Elliott, C. H., Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2021). Learning to center relational ontologies: desettling interaction analysis methods. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-ICLS 2021. International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2021.851

  • Krishnamoorthy, R., Elliott, C. H., Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2021). Learning to center relational ontologies: desettling interaction analysis methods. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-ICLS 2021. International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2021.851

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuntz, A. M., & Presnall, M. M. (2012). Wandering the tactical: From interview to intraview. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 732–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412453016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, N. (2015). The unseen world: Reflections on Leeuwenhoek (1677) ‘Concerning little animals.’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1666), 20140344. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz Taguchi, H., & Palmer, A. (2013). A more ‘livable’school? A diffractive analysis of the performative enactments of girls’ ill-/well-being with (in) school environments. Gender and Education, 25(6), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.829909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, A. M. (2020). Ambulatory sequences: Ecologies of learning by attending and observing on the move. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1767104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, A., & Bang, M. (2018). “Look it, this is how you know:” Family forest walks as a context for knowledge-building about the natural world. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1429443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, C. (2019). The materiality of scientific instruments and why it might matter to science education. Material practice and materiality: Too long ignored in science education (pp. 9–23). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Education Research and Training. (2008). Science textbook for class VII. New Delhi, India. Publication Division, NCERT.

  • Nelson-Barber, S., & Estrin, E. T. (1995). Bringing Native American perspectives to mathematics and science teaching. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otrelcass, K., & Cowie, B. (2019). The materiality of materials and artefacts used in science classrooms. In C. Milne & K. Scantlebury (Eds), Material practice and materiality: too long ignored in science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01974-7_3

  • Picard, M., & Sandi, C. (2021). The social nature of mitochondria: Implications for human health. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 120, 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanujan, A. K. (1989). Is there an Indian way of thinking? An informal essay. Contributions to Indian sociology, 23(1), 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50008-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semali, L. M., & Kincheloe, J. L. (2002). What is indigenous knowledge?: Voices from the academy. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, J., Monk, M., & Johnson, S. (1999). A comparative study of attitudes to the aims of practical work in science education in Egypt, Korea and the UK. International Journal of Science Education, 21(12), 1311–1323. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, H. L. (2009). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203872956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. A. (2016). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthumanist research practices for education. In: Posthuman research practices in education. 5–24. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453082_2

  • Taylor, C. A. (2016). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthumanist research practices for education. In: Posthuman research practices in education. 5–24. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453082_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2014). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Curriculum and Instruction, Pennsylvania State University, 141 Chambers Building University Park, State College, PA, 16802, USA

    Rishi Krishnamoorthy

Authors
  1. Rishi Krishnamoorthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rishi Krishnamoorthy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lead Editor: Anita Hussénius

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishnamoorthy, R. Intra-action analysis of emergent science phenomena: examining meaning-making with the more than human in science classrooms. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 18, 853–877 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10148-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10148-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation