Abstract
After reviewing the main discussions on scientific explanation in the literature, this paper outlines a particular approach to explanations based on sociocultural analysis. The aim is to provide a base for discussing explanations as cultural tools in science education. Drawing on studies of collective remembering, this paper focuses on parallels between explanations and narratives to propose the use of two analytical distinctions: one between the referential and dialogic functions of explanations and the other between specific explanations and schematic explanatory templates. This paper contributes to other studies on scientific explanation in emphasizing how textual resources shape representations of the natural world. In order to illustrate the utility of these distinctions, this paper examines an explanation in quantum physics taken from a college textbook.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Alameh, S., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2018). Towards a philosophically guided schema for studying scientific explanation in science education. Science & Education, 27(9–10), 831–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0021-9
Aspect, A. (2006). Foreword: One century of quantum revolutions. In V. Scarani (Ed.), Quantum physics, a first encounter: Interference, entanglement, and reality. (pp. ix–xiv). Oxford University Press.
Bacon, F. (1965). Francis Bacon: A selection of his works (S. Warhaft(Ed.)). Macmillan of Canada.
Baily, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2010). Teaching and understanding of quantum interpretations in modern physics courses. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.010101
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four esseys by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist). University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.)) University of Texas Press.
Bartlett, F. C. (1995). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Berland, L. K., & Mcneill, K. L. (2012). For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? a response to osborne and patterson. Science Education, 96(5), 814–817. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21000
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20286
Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95(4), 639–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20449
Brewer, W. F., Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (1998). Explanation in scientists and children. Minds and Machines, 8(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008242619231
Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. University of California Press.
Cheong, Y. W., & Song, J. (2014). Different levels of the meaning of wave-particle duality and a suspensive perspective on the interpretation of quantum theory. Science & Education Education, 23(5), 1011–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9633-2
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005
Eisberg, R., & Resnick, R. (1974). Quantum physics of atoms molecules, solids, nuclei and particles. Wiley.
Freire, O. (2003). A story without an ending: the quantum physics contrversy 1950–1970. Science & Education, 12, 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025317927440
Friedman, M. (1974). Explanation and scientific understanding. The Journal of Philosophy, 71(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024924
Gingras, Y. (2001). What did mathematics do to physics? History of Science, 39(4), 383–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327530103900401
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge University Press.
Hanson, N. R. (1959). On the symmetry between explanation and prediction. Philosophical Review, 68(3), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182567
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. The Free Press.
Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135–175. https://doi.org/10.1086/287002
Henriksen, E. K., Angell, C., Vistnes, A. I., & Bungum, B. (2018). What is light? Students’ reflections on the wave-particle duality of light and the nature of physics. Science & Education, 27(1–2), 81–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9963-1
Jammer, M. (1989). The conceptual development of quantum mechanics. (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in Science Education. (pp. 3–27). Springer.
Kalkanis, G., Hadzidaki, P., & Stavrou, D. (2003). An instructional model for a radical conceptual change towards quantum mechanics concepts. Science Education, 87(2), 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10033
Kitcher, P. (1981). Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science, 48(4), 507–531. https://doi.org/10.1086/289019
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. Continuum.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virture: A study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J. S., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations using scaffolded curriculum materials and assessments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. King’s College London, School of Education.
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Open University Press.
Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2005). A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Science Education, 89(4), 535–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20063
Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I., & McGillicuddy, K. (1996). Explaining science in the classroom. Open University Press.
Osborne, J. F., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95(4), 627–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20438
Osnaghi, S., Freitas, F., & Freire, O. (2009). The origin of the Everettian heresy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40, 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.10.002
Pereira, A. P., Lima Junior, P., & Rodrigues, R. F. (2016). Explaining as mediated action: An analysis of pre-service teachers’ account of forces of inertia in non-inertial frames of reference. Science & Education, 25(3–4), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9806-x
Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the Folktale. University of Texas.
Rocksén, M. (2016). The many roles of “explanation” in science education: A case study. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4), 837–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9629-5
Rodrigues, R. F., & Pereira, A. P. (2018). Explicações no ensino de ciências: revisando o conceito a partir de três distinções básicas. Ciência & Educacão, 24(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320180010004
Sakurai, J. J. (1994). Modern quantum mechanics. Addison-Wesley.
Salmon, W. C. (1977). An "At-At" theory of causal influence. Philosophy of Science, 44(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1086/288739.
Salmon, W. C. (1989). Four decades of scientific explanation. In P. Kitcher & W. C. Salmon (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science:Vol XIII. Scientific explanation. (pp. 3–219). University of Minnesota Press.
Salmon, W. C. (1990). Scientific explanation: Causation and unification. Crítica Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, 22(66), 3–23https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1990.773
Scriven, M. (1959). Explanation and prediction in evolutionary theory. Science, 130(3374), 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.130.3374.477
Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences. Philosophical papers 2. Cambridge University Press.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. Clarendon Press.
Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naïve physics. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. (pp. 61–76). Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected work of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol 1 - Problems of general psychology.Plenum Press.
Ward, P. D. (1997). The call of distant mammoths: Why the Ice Age mammoths disappeared. Copernicus.
Weber, E., Van Bouwel, J., & De Vreese, L. (2013). Scientific explanation. Springer.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1987). Modes of discourse in the nuclear arms debate. Current Research on Peace and Violence, 10(2/3), 102–112. Retrieved August 21, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40725066.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (2001). Narratives as cultural tools in sociocultural analysis: Official history in soviet and post-Soviet Russia. Ethos, 28(4), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.2000.28.4.511
Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (2008). The narrative organization of collective. Memory, 36(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2008.00007.x
Wertsch, J. V., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Collective memory: Conceptual foundations and theoretical approaches. Memory, 16(3), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701801434
Yeo, J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2014). Constructing a scientific explanation—A narrative account. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1902–1935. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.880527
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Lead Editor: Maria Andrée.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pereira, A. Explanations as cultural tools in science education. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 17, 383–403 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10062-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10062-8
Keywords
- Scientific explanation
- Sociocultural analysis
- Dialogic function
- Schematic templates
- Wave-particle duality