Abstract
The M(East) ward of Mumbai is home to one of Asia’s largest open landfill sites. Waste, therefore, is a source of livelihood for millions of people living in the vicinity of this landfill site. In this article, we analyze the educational discourse on waste in the schools of the M(East) ward to understand how it is positioned with respect to the concerns, experiences, and out-of-school knowledge of the students of that community. We employ a critical discourse analysis framework to examine the textbook chapter on waste, classroom teaching practices, and participant teachers’ interviews. The educational discourse is read against the data from focus group discussions with students in out-of-school settings. Our analysis reveals that the curriculum approaches the topic of waste in a reductionist manner with a focus on “scientific” management of waste, while connections between the generation of waste, consumerism, and the nature of economic growth are sidelined. The curriculum and teachers’ discourse exhibits a class and caste character when they emphasize the aesthetic effects of waste management and certain kinds of proenvironmental behaviors and actions. It remains silent about the immense contribution of sanitation work to easing the environmental burden. The teachers’ efforts to contextualize the subject matter and connect to students’ life worlds are also limited. The out-of-school interactions with the students reveal a rich understanding of the recycling economy and, when provided with the opportunities, the resourcefulness to critically evaluate their living conditions. Finally, drawing on scholarship that discusses environmentalism and critical pedagogy in the Indian subcontinent, we envisage possibilities for transformative science education for the students of the M(East) ward.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambedkar, B. R. (1944). Annihilation of caste with a reply to Mahatma Gandhi (Third edition).
Apple, M. W. (1992). The text and cultural politics. Educational Researcher, 21(7), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X021007004.
Apple, M. W. (2019). Ideology and curriculum. (4th ed.). Routledge.
Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641.
Baviskar, A. (2002). The politics of the city. Seminar (516). Retrieved from https://www.india-seminar.com/2002/516/516%20amita%20baviskar.htm
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, culture and society. London: Sage.
Boo, K. (2014). Behind the beautiful forevers. Random House Trade Paperbacks.
Carson, R. (2002). Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Central Pollution Control Board. (2004). Dioxins (PCDDs) and Furan (PCDFs)—critical persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Delhi: NISCAIR.
Chatterjee, B. (2016). Pollutant particles near Deonar were 8 times more than permissible limit. Hindustan Times (Mumbai edition). Retrieved from https://www.hindustantimes.com/mumbai/pollutant-particles-near-deonar-were-8-times-more-than-permissible-limit/story-VOWHREbj7pIpHzRxmiqzEO.html.
Demaria, F., & Schindler, S. (2016). Contesting urban metabolism: struggles over waste-to-energy in Delhi India. Antipode, 48(2), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12191.
Doron, A., & Jefferey, R. (2018). Waste of a nation: garbage and growth in India. Harvard University Press.
Douglas, M. (2003). Purity and danger: an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.
Fox, L. & Leonard, A. (2007). The story of stuff. Tides Foundation, Funders Workgroup for Sustainable Production and Consumption, and Free Range Studios. Retrieved from https://www.storyofstuff.org/movies/story-of-stuff/
Haydock, K., & Srivastava, H. (2019). Environmental philosophies underlying the teaching of environmental education: a case study in India. Environmental Education Research, 25(7), 1038–1065.
Jørgensen, N. J., Madsen, K. D., & Læssøe, J. (2018). Waste in education: the potential of materiality and practice. Environmental Education Research, 24(6), 807–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1357801.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751.
Lahiry, S. (2019). India’s challenges in waste management. Down to Earth, May 8, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/india/india-s-challenges-in-waste-management-56753
Levinson, R. (2009). The manufacture of aluminium and the rubbish-pickers of Rio: building interlocking narratives. School science review, 90(333), 119–124.
Levinson, R. (2014). Undermining neo-liberal orthodoxies in school science: telling the story of aluminium. In L. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education (pp. 381–397). Dordrecht: Springer.
M C Mehta v. Union of India and others, Case No. writ petition (civil) 860/1991. Supreme Court of India (18 December 2003). https://main.sci.gov.in/judgment/judis/25714.pdf
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education (2014). Science and Technology: Standard IX, Pune.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM). (2009). Mumbai human development report. Oxford University Press.
O’Brien, M. (1999). Rubbish values: reflections on the political economy of waste. Science as Culture, 8(3), 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439909526548.
Pellow, D. N. (2004). Garbage wars: The struggle for environmental justice in Chicago. MIT Press.
Raveendran, A., & Chunawala, S. (2015). Reproducing values: a feminist critique of a higher secondary biology textbook chapter on reproductive health. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 22(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521515578244.
Rege, S. (2010). Education as “Trutiya Ratna”: Towards Phule-Ambedkarite feminist pedagogical practice. Economic and Political Weekly, 88–98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20787534
Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & Joseph, G. O. G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 365–416. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003365.
Sama – Resource group for women and health. (2015). Spectres of Malthus: a study of representation of population in school textbooks in India. http://www.samawomenshealth.in/spectres-of-malthus/
Shiva, V. (2016). Staying alive: Women, ecology, and development. North Atlantic Books.
Sinha, A. (2018). Garbage gangs of Deonar: the kingpins and their multi-crore trade. The Quint. Retrieved from https://www.thequint.com/explainers/garbage-business-in-deonar-dumping-ground-rag-pickers-businessmen-and-mafia
Stalin, K. (Director). (2007). India untouched: Stories of a people apart [Documentary]. DRISHTI Media, Arts & Human Rights and Navsarjan Trust. https://www.cultureunplugged.com/play/5752/India-Untouched---Stories-of-a-People-Apart.
Stavy, R., & Stachel, D. (1985). Children’s ideas about ‘solid’ and ‘liquid.’ European Journal of Science Education, 7(4), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528850070409.
Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS). (2015). Social economic conditions and vulnerabilities: a report of the baseline survey of M(East) ward, Mumbai. https://www.tiss.edu/view/11/projects/transforming-m-ward/
Wilson, B., & Singh, B. (2016). The long march to eliminate manual scavenging. India Exclusion Report, 298–319. https://indiaexclusionreport.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/9-The-Long-March-to-Eliminate-Manual-Scavenging.pdf
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 1–33). London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editor: Matthew Weinstein.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srivastava, H., Gupta, A. & Raveendran, A. Examining the discourse on waste in school education from the standpoint of marginalized communities in Mumbai. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 17, 301–330 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10049-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10049-5