Abstract
This paper focuses on science teaching learning practices in a culturally diverse classroom of a Nepalese public secondary level science teacher who was purposefully selected. I focus on how science teaching in this science teacher’s classroom is interactive, creative, collaborative and inclusive. Additionally, I explain how the school environment can create and extend multicultural science knowledge. A 50-min in-depth interview was conducted and transcribed, as well as observations of his classroom activities of science teaching which were noted in a diary. Transcribed interviews and classroom observation notes were translated into English and coded by me. All data were analyzed indicating that the secondary science teacher’s efforts were not found to be culturally relevant as his efforts were affected by pedagogical, environmental and institutional problems. A heavy emphasis on the national science curriculum is destroying teacher’s teaching style in a culturally diverse classroom. This article calls for the participation of other school science teachers, other group teachers, women participation and the importance of inclusion of different cultural students’ voices in science teaching.
Abstract
यस लेखले सांस्कृतिक रुपले विविधता युक्त विज्ञान कक्षा शिक्षण क्रियाकलापलाई जोड दिएको छ । यस लेखको मूख्य उद्देश्य सृजनात्मक, अर्न्तकृयात्मक, सहभागितात्मक र समावेशिताका साथ कसरी विज्ञान शिक्षणलाई अगाडि बढाउने, साथै विद्यालयको सिकाइ वातावरणलाई बहु सास्कृतिक पक्षलाई समेटेर कसरी विज्ञान सिकाउन सकिन्छ भन्ने रहेको छ । उल्लेखित उद्देश्य पूरा गर्न एउटा माध्यमिक विद्यालय र त्यस विद्यालयमा विज्ञान पढाउने शिक्षकलाई उद्देश्यमूलक नमूना छनौट विधिमा आधारित भइ छनौट गरियो र करिव पचास मिनेटको गहनतम् अर्न्तर्वाता लिनुको साथै उसको कक्षा अवलोकन पनि गरियो । कक्षा अवोलकन र अर्न्तवार्ता रेकर्डलाई अंग्रेजिमा अनुवाद गरियो । उक्त अनुवादलाई ट्रान्सक्राइव गरी कोडिङ गरियो । उक्त कोडिङबाट बाइस वटा आधारअभूत सार र त्यसबाट तीनवटा मूख्य विरवव्यापी सार (Global Themes) निकालियो । उक्त तीन वटा थेमको आधारमा क्रिटिकल रेस्पोन्स पेडागोजी सिद्धान्तसँग जोड्दै तथ्याङकलाई व्याख्या विश्लेषण गरियो । जसमा सैद्धान्तिक पक्षले उल्लेख गरे अनुसार कक्षाकोठा शिक्षण गरेको वा सम्पूर्ण पक्षलाई कक्षा शिक्षणमा सहभागिता गराएको पाइएन । बहु सास्कृतिक समावेशी शिक्षणका लागि पेशागत तालीम तथा पेडागोजीकल, वातावरणीय र संस्थागत समस्या भएको पाइयो। समाबेशी शिक्षक अभाब हुनुका साथै बढी विषयवस्तु समावेश भएको विज्ञान पाठ्यक्रमले गर्दा सामाजिक विविधतालाई समावेश गरी कक्षामा विज्ञान शिक्षण गर्न कठिनाइ भएको पाइयो । यस खोजमा एक जना मात्र शिक्षकलाई सहभागिको रुपमा लिएको छ । यदि अन्य शिक्षक तथा महिला शिक्षकलाई सहभागिको रुपमा छनौट गरेको भएमा यो भन्दा फरक विज्ञान शिक्षणको अवस्था पाउन सकिने थियो होला तर त्यसलाई समावेश गर्न नसक्नु यो खोजको कमजोर पक्ष हो ।
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barajas, M. S. (2015). Pedagogical approaches to multicultural education within teacher preparation programs. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Western Michigan University.
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2012). National Population and Housing Census 2011. Kathmandu: Central Bureau of Statistics.
Copper, J., & Matthews, C. (2005). A decade of concern: A review of multicultural science education issues in the science teacher. The Science Teacher, 72(3), 49–52.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited.
Gallard, M., Pitts, A. J., Brkich, W., & Robles, S. L. R. (2018). How does one recognize contextual mitigating factors (CMFs) as a basis to understand and arrive at better approaches to research designs? Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9872-2.
Garvin, B. A. (2015). An investigation of a culturally responsive approach to science education in a summer program for marginalized youth (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Carolina. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3191.
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12002.
Hamza, H., & Hahn, L. H. (2012). Practicing constructivist and culturally responsive methods through differentiated instruction. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 75–82.
Hangen, S. (2007). Creating a New Nepal: The ethnic dimension. Washington, DC: The East-West Centre.
Johnson, C. (2011). The road to culturally relevant science: Exploring how teachers navigate change in pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 170–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20405.
Kalu, U. N., Alamina, J. I., & Ovute, A. O. (2015). Pedagogical practices in the teaching of science in secondary schools in Rivers State Nigeria. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 50–55.
Kelly-Jackson, C. P., & Jackson, O.-T. (2011). Meeting their fullest potential: The beliefs and teaching of a culturally relevant science teacher. Creative Education, 2(4), 408–413. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.24059.
Khanal, P. (2017). Falling prey to the dominant culture? Demystifying symbolic violence against ethnic minority students in Nepal. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 25(3), 456–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2017.1280841.
Krasnoff, B. (2016). Culturally responsive teaching: A guide to evidence-based practices for teaching all students equitably. Region X Equity Assistance Center Education Northwest. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=A%20guide%20to%20evidence-based%20practices%20for%20teaching%20all%20students%20equitably.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995a). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995b). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2002). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. In S. J. Denbo & L. M. Beaulieu (Eds.), Improving schools for African American students (pp. 95–102). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publisher LTD.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). Yes, but how do we do it? Practicing culturally relevant pedagogy. In J. Landsman & C. W. Lewis (Eds.), White teachers/Diverse classrooms: A guide to building inclusive schools, promoting high expectations, and eliminating racism (pp. 29–42). Sterling: Stylus.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0; a.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751.
Laughter, J. C., & Adams, A. D. (2012). Culturally relevant science teaching in middle school. Urban Education, 47(6), 1106–1134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912454443.
Mensah, F. M. (2011). A case for culturally relevant teaching in science education and lessons learned for teacher education. The Journal of Negro Education, 80(3), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/41341135.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implication (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implication (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2016). School sector development plan 2016/17-2022/23. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, Ministry of Education.
Parajuli, M. N. (2014). Realizing the existence of multiple forms of knowledge: A strategy towards seeing education for rural transformation. Journal of Education and Research, 4(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v4i2.12392.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2010). Culturally relevant pedagogy: An ethno mathematical approach. Horizontes, 28(1), 19–31.
Stirling, J. A. (2001). Thematic network: A analysis tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748.
Underwood, J. B., & Mensah, F. M. (2018). An investigation of science teacher educators’ perceptions of culturally relevant pedagogy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1423457.
Upadhyay, B., Atwood, E., & Tharu, B. (2020). Actions for sociopolitical consciousness in a high school science class: A case study of ninth grade class with predominantly indigenous students. J Res Sci Teach. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21626.
Upadhyay, B., Atwood, E. & Tharu, B. (in press). Antiracist pedagogy in a high school science class: A case of high school science teacher in an Indigenous high school. Journal of Science Teacher Education.
Warence-Grice, A. M. (2017). Advocacy for equity: Extending culturally relevant pedagogy in predominantly white suburban schools. Teachers College Record, 119, 1–26.
Wenzel, M. F. L. M. (2017). Middle school teacher beliefs about classroom diversity and their Influence on differentiated instructional practices (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Portland State University.
Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Acknowledgements
“I would like to thank Dr. Alejandro Gallard and Dr. Bhaskar Upadhyay for their invaluable suggestions over many cycles of revisions to improve and finalize this manuscript.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editor: Alejandro J. Gallard Martínez
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koirala, K.P. Multicultural classroom teaching in Nepal: perspectives and practices of a secondary level science teacher. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 16, 1163–1182 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-10012-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-10012-w

