Abstract
In the past several decades, women have made considerable progress toward gender equity in the USA, but women in general and women of color in particular continue to be underrepresented in some fields of STEM, notably engineering and computing. Women of color in these fields are also underrepresented in the STEM education research literature. In this article, we review the literature on sociocultural theory and empirical research grounded in it to propose a framework for thinking about how young women of color encounter and experience engineering and computing in local educational contexts, and how their encounters and experiences might be enhanced and lead to more sustained interests and identities in these fields. The framework motivates an examination of the interrelationships among institutional practices, normative discourses, identities, interactional dynamics, and experience-near external exclusions in the contexts of the young women’s lives. As such, our concerns are less with provision of the content per se of engineering or computing and more with the structure, organization, and discourses of the educational contexts in which the groundwork is laid for the development of interests and identities related to these fields. We briefly review significant challenges faced by middle and high school girls and young women of color as they encounter in-school and out-of-school practices and interactional dynamics related to engineering and computing, respond to local and societal discourses circulating about these fields, form social and personal identities with respect to these fields, and grapple with external exclusions, e.g., undocumented legal status and unresponsive institutions, affecting pursuit of engineering and computing. We then examine ways in which scholars taking sociocultural approaches have addressed these challenges through action research. Next, we assess the promise and limitations of these efforts in overcoming the challenges. Due to the sociocultural perspective that frames our approach, the research methodology used in the work we review is primarily qualitative, and the approach to action is primarily participatory action research. We conclude the paper with a preliminary synthesis of research on the sociocultural system in which young women of color in the USA and Canada encounter and pursue engineering and computing, including its foundational components in mathematics and science education. We argue that this system repeatedly plays out in unequal opportunity structures, deficit discourses, marginalizing interactions, conflicting identity demands, and external exclusions for many young women of color. The system carries expectancies that make sustained participation in engineering and computing risky and difficult, even if these young women have interest, ability, or ambitions to pursue these fields. We propose a program of response to these barriers, based in sociocultural practice theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. D., Gupta, P., & Cotumaccio, A. (2014). Long-term participants: A museum program enhances girls’ STEM interest, motivation, and persistence. Afterschool Matters, 20, 13–20.
Allen, C. D. (2016). Toward equitable teaching and learning opportunities: An examination of STEM education reform implementation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder. Retrieved from https://scholar.colorado.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=educ_gradetds.
Allen, C. D., & Eisenhart, M. (2017). Fighting for desired versions of a future self: How young women negotiated STEM-related identities in the discursive landscape of educational opportunity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 407–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1294985.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). ‘Balancing acts’: Elementary school girls’ negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96, 967–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21031.
Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20392.
Bang, M., Medin, D., Washinawatok, K., & Chapman, S. (2010). Innovations in culturally based science education through partnerships and community. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning (pp. 569–592). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0.
Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345322.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2.
Bruning, M., Bystydzienski, J., & Eisenhart, M. (2015). Intersectionality as a framework for understanding diverse young women’s commitment to engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007345
Bullock, E. (2017). Only STEM can save us? Examining race, place, and STEM education as property. Educational Studies, 53(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1369082.
Bystydzienski, J., Eisenhart, M., & Bruning, M. (2015). High school is not too late: Developing girls’ interest and engagement in engineering careers. Career Development Quarterly, 63(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2015.00097.x.
Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2012). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 37–75. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212458142.
Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2018). A longitudinal study of equity-oriented STEM-rich making among youth from historically marginalized communities. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218758668.
Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
Carlone, H. (2017). Disciplinary identity as analytic construct and design goal: Making learning sciences matter. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1336026.
Carlone, H., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20413.
Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.
Carlone, H., Johnson, A., & Scott, C. (2015). Agency amidst formidable structures: How girls perform gender in science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21224.
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S., Montoya, A., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052.
Cooper, C. (2011). Bridging multiple worlds: Cultures, identities, and pathways to college. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195080209.001.0001.
Eisenhart, M. (2019). The entanglements of ethnography and participatory action research in educational research in North American. In G. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.324.
Eisenhart, M., & Allaman, E. (2017). Text messaging in the lives of American high school girls. Ethnography and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2017.1321491.
Eisenhart, M., & Allen, C. (2016). Hollowed out: The meaning and authoring of math and science identities in the neoliberal context of externally-sanctioned high schools. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(3), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1188962.
Eisenhart, M., Weis, L., Allen, C., Cipollone, K., Stich, A., & Dominguez, R. (2015). High school opportunities for STEM: Comparing inclusive STEM-focused and comprehensive high schools. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 52(6), 763–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21213.
Erickson, F. (1982). Taught cognitive learning in its immediate environments: A neglected topic in the anthropology of education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 13(2), 149–180. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1982.13.2.05x1831k.
Esmode, I. (2009). Ideas and identities: Supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 1008–1043. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309332562.
Gilbert, P. (2010). Cultural identity and political ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748623877.001.0001.
Gutiérrez, K. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3.
Gutiérrez, K., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2015). The possibilities and limits of the structure-agency dialectic in advancing science for all. Journal of Research in Science Education, 52(4), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21229.
Hall, J. (2014). Introduction. In J. Hall (Ed.), Underprivileged school children and the assault on dignity: Policy challenges and resistance (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 53–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_3.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W. J., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2009). Social practice theory and the social production of persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 1–15.
Holland, D., Price, C., & Westermeyer, W. (2018). Political becoming in movements: Lessons from the environmental, Tea Party, and Rastafari movements. In C. Strauss & J. Friedman (Eds.), Political sentiments and social movements (pp. 265–293). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72341-9_10.
Ireland, D., Freeman, K., Winston-Proctor, C., Laine, De, Lowe, S., & Woodson, K. (2018). (Un)hidden figures: A synthesis of research examining the intersectional experiences of black women and girls in STEM education. Review of Research in Education, 42, 226–254. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759072.
Kim, A., Sinatra, G., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318779957.
Lynch, S., Peters-Burton, E., Behrend, T., House, A., Ford, M., Spillane, N., et al. (2017). Understanding inclusive STEM high schools as opportunity structures for underrepresented students: Critical components. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(5), 712–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21437.
Means, B., Wang, H., Young, V., Peters, V. L., & Lynch, S. J. (2016). STEM-focused high schools as a strategy for enhancing readiness for postsecondary STEM programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21313.
Nasir, N. (2012). Racialized identities: Race and achievement among African American youth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Nasir, N., & Vakil, S. (2017). STEM-focused academies in urban schools: Tensions and possibilities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 376–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1314215.
National Center for Women and Informational Technology. (2019). NCWIT scorecard: The status of women in computing. https://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/ncwit_executive_summary_scorecard_05132019.pdf.
National Science Board. (2012). Science and engineering indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
National Science Foundation. (2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. https://www.ssf.gov/statistics/women/.
Neal-Jackson, A. (2018). A meta-ethnographic review of the experiences of African American girls and young women in k-12 education. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 508–546. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318760785.
Pinkard, N., Erete, S., Martin, C., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2017). Digital youth divas: Exploring narrative-driven curriculum to spark middle school students’ interest in computational activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 477–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1307199.
Reinholz, D., & Shah, N. (2018). Equity analytics: A methodological approach for quantifying participation patterns in mathematics classroom discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 140–177. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.2.0140.
Rogers-Chapman, M. (2014). Accessing STEM-focused education. Factors that contribute to the opportunity to attend STEM high schools across the United States. Education and Urban Society, 46, 716–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124512469815.
Saw, G., Chang, C.-N., & Chan, H.-Y. (2018). Cross-sectional and longitudinal disparities in STEM career aspirations at the intersection of gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Educational Researcher, 47(8), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18787818.
Scogin, S., Cavlazoglu, B., LeBlanc, J., & Stuessy, C. (2018). Inspiring science achievement: A mixed methods examination of the practices and characteristics of successful science programs in diverse high schools. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 13, 649–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9796-7.
Scott, K., & White, M. (2013). COMPUGIRLS’ standpoint culturally-responsive computing and its effect on girls of color. Urban Education, 48, 657–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913491219.
Sengupta-Irving, T. (in press). Positioned apart: Mathematical learning as becoming. Anthropology and Education Quarterly.
Steele, C. M. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi: And other clues to how stereotypes affect us. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Tsui, L. (2007). Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature. Journal of Negro Education, 76(4), 555–581.
Tucker-Drob, E., Cheung, A., & Briley, D. (2014). Gross domestic product, science interest, and science achievement. Psychological Science, 25(11), 2047–2057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614548726.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019a). Women in the labor force: A databook 2018–2019. https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-databook/2019/pdf/home.pdf.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019b). Annual report: Labor force characteristics by race and ethnicity 2018–2019. https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/race-and-ethnicity/2018/pdf/home.pdf.
Van Horne, K., & Bell, P. (2017). Youth disciplinary identification during participation in contemporary project-based science investigations in school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 437–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1330689.
Vossoughi, S., Escude, M., Espinoza, M., & Kitundu, W. (in press). Hands and eyes: Embodied learning, social relations, and the genesis of pedagogical perception. Anthropology and Education Quarterly.
Wade-Jaimes, K., & Schwartz, R. (2018). “I don’t think it’s science”: African American girls and the figured world of school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21521.
Watts, R. J., Diemer, M. A., & Voight, A. M. (2011). Critical consciousness: Current status and future directions. In C. Flanagan & B. Christens (Eds.), Youth civic development: Work at the cutting edge. New directions for child and adolescent development (pp. 43–57). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.310.
Weis, L., Eisenhart, M., Cipollone, K., Stich, A., Nikischer, A., Hanson, J., et al. (2015). In the guise of STEM education reform: Opportunity structures and outcomes in inclusive STEM-focused high schools. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1024–1059. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215604045.
Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Lead Editor: C. Milne.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eisenhart, M., Allen, C.D. Addressing underrepresentation of young women of color in engineering and computing through the lens of sociocultural theory. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 15, 793–824 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09976-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09976-6