Looking forward by looking back: equity in science education as socially just and morally healing action
In this conceptual paper, we argue that social justice, morality, and healing must be at the core of an equity agenda for science education. When we view equity through this lens, teachers’ and researchers’ historically informed moral stances become just as important as the equitable distribution of teaching and learning resources and the achievement of excellent learning outcomes for all students. Without looking back to the history of science and its prejudices, we miss the reasons why equity in science education continues to be so hard to attain. Incorporating insights from critical race theory, we see ideas of social justice and morality overlapping as well as supporting our understanding of a new direction for equity in science education. We do not frame moral decisions as autonomous actions carried out on the basis of universal a priori principles; rather, we believe they are dialogically informed by culture and context. We therefore place emphasis on responsibilities rather than rules. In this article, we first describe equity through the lens of social justice and present an overview of recent equity research in science education. We next examine the idea of collective morality as we have conceptualized it as science educators and researchers. Then we discuss how morality and social justice intersect with histories of science and offer a different way to consider equity in science education. Finally, we propose some historical case studies that might be of use to the science education community to illustrate how morality and social justice could be a part of rethinking equity-oriented science education.
KeywordsEquity Morality Healing Conceptual paper
- Albrecht, N. (2015). Views of science teaching and learning by immigrant Somali elders: Perceptions of conflict and acceptance. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/177080.
- Barton, A. C. (1998). Feminist science education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Bianchini, J., Akerson, V., Calabrese Barton, A., Lee, O., & Rodriguez, A. (Eds.). (2013). Moving the equity agenda forward: Equity research, practice, and policy in science education. Rotterdam: Springer. ISBN: 978-94-007-4466-0 (Print) 978-94-007-4467-7 (Online).Google Scholar
- Brickhouse, N. (2013). Conceptions of inequality in the era of Bush/Obama. In J. Bianchini, V. Akerson, A. Calabrese Barton, O. Lee, & A. Rodriguez (Eds.), Moving the equity agenda forward: Equity research, practice, and policy in science education (pp. 39–51). Rotterdam: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bronowski, J. (1972). Science and human values. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carter, P. L., & Welner, K. G. (2016). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give all children an even chance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Cobern, W. W. (1991). World view theory and science education research. Scientific literacy and cultural studies project, Paper 44. http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/science_slcsp/44. Accessed Feb 2019.
- DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. New York: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Gonzalez, L. (2009). Teaching mathematics for social justice: Reflections on a community of practice for urban high school mathematics teachers. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 2(1), 22–51.Google Scholar
- González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practice in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
- Ladson-Billings, G., & Donnor, J. (2005). The moral activist role of critical race theory scholarship. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3, 279–301.Google Scholar
- Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–67.Google Scholar
- NARST. (2017). A message to the NARST community. NARST. http://www.narst.org/docs/NARST_Board_message_020917.pdf. 9 February 2017.
- Nasir, N., Rosebery, A., Warren, B., & Lee, C. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489–504). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12984.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center. (2015a). Americans, politics and science issues. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/07/01/americans-politics-and-science-issues/. 1 July 2015.
- Pew Research Center. (2015b). Public and scientists’ views on science and society. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/. 29 January 2015.
- Powell, D. (2016). Trump’s first 100 days: Science education and schools. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trumps-first-100-days-science-education-and-schools/. 5 December 2016.
- Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- Skloot, R. (2010). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
- Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
- Stirling, J., & McGloin, C. (2015). Critical pedagogy and social inclusion policy in Australian higher education: Identifying the disjunctions. Radical Pedagogy, 12(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
- Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40. http://decolonization.org/index.php/des/article/view/18630/15554.
- United States Department of Education. (2009). Race to the top program executive summary. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf. Accessed Feb 2019.
- Wessel, L. (2017). Hundreds rally for science at demonstration near AAAS meeting. Science (news). http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/hundreds-rally-science-demonstration-near-aaas-meeting. 19 February 2017.
- World Medical Association. (2015). Medical ethics manual (3rd ed.). https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Ethics_manual_3rd_Nov2015_en.pdf. Accessed Feb 2019.