Love, politics and science education on a damaged planet
This article attempts to add to the conversation on equity and science education by arguing that activist work necessitates turning away from conservative fields of research that only forward the agenda of national governments/patriarchy/white supremacy/capital, and turning toward larger sociopolitical movements and non-dominant forms of knowledge that can help communities move toward multi-species flourishing. Building on the work of Chantal Pouliot, who argues that academics have a key role to play in environmental and social issues of public concern, we argue that engaging larger systemic contexts is absolutely necessary when educating for different futures. Specifically, we extend the use of Sheila Jasanoff’s (Science and public reason, Routledge, New York, 2012a. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203113820; Sheila Jasanoff’s in: Rajan (ed) Lively capital: biotechnologies, ethics, and governance in global markets, Duke University Press, Durham, pp. 155–183, 2012b. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393306-005) work that demonstrates how modern Western law and governance specifically aim to take common, “natural” spaces and turn them into profit/capital. We conclude by suggesting that a politics of love can become a guiding force for justice-oriented scholarship in science education.
KeywordsLove Science education Politics Public Activism
- Althusser, L. (1970). Philosophy as a revolutionary weapon. New Left Review, 1(64), 3.Google Scholar
- Badiou, A. (2005). Infinite thought (Clemens, O. Feltham, Trans.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Butler, J. (2001). What is critique? An essay on Foucault’s virtue. Available at: http://eipcp.net/transversal/0806/butler/en. Accessed November 27, 2017.
- Hooks, B. (2006). Outlaw culture: Resisting representations. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jasanoff, S. (2008). Representation and re-presentation in Litigation Science. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116, 123–129. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2199272/. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9976.
- Rancière, J. (2015). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
- Simpson, L. (2015). Islands of decolonial love: Stories & songs. Arp Books.Google Scholar
- Spiller, P. (May 29, 2017). Could subjects soon be a thing of the past in Finland? BBC News online, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39889523.
- subRosa. (2008). Common knowledge and political love. In B. da Costa, K. Philip (Eds.), Tactical biopolitics: Art, activism, and technoscience (pp. 221–242). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar