Beads and beadwork as cultural artifacts used in mediating learners’ agentic constructs in science classrooms: a case for place-based learning

Abstract

This paper explores the ways learners respond to and express themselves while interacting with cultural artifacts or cultural realia, beads and beadwork, used to mediate the teaching and learning of life science concepts in a science classroom. South African policies, enacted in the National Curriculum Statement (NCS) and the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS), mandate that a culturally responsive pedagogy be used to teach indigenous learners in order to assist them in learning science concepts. Hence, the choice of beads and beadwork, which are cultural artifacts found in learners lived world as realia, creating an enabling context accessible to teachers and learners. This study was conducted in periurban Black township schools near a metropolitan city in South Africa. In order to achieve a thick description (Geertz in The interpretation of cultures, Basic Books Publishers, New York, 1973) of class interactions between the teacher and her learners in using cultural artifacts, beads and beadwork, as instructional models to mediate the teaching and learning of abstract structures of organic compounds, such as glucose, fructose, lipids and proteins, were enacted and video-recorded. Video analysis of class interactions and teachers’ professional development was employed. We also engaged open-ended questionnaires to extract learners’ basic views of the use of beads and beadwork as instructional models. Findings indicated that the use of beads and beadwork as instructional models afforded learners a context that enabled them to express and expand their cognitive constructs of what learning science from cultural perspectives looks and feels like. It also showed that learners’ capitals, namely cultural, social and symbolic capitals, enhance the development of cognitive capital leading to the emergence of more knowledgeable other(s) within indigenous science classrooms. Findings also showed that cultural artifacts enabled the restructuring of the teachers’ pedagogical practices toward enhancing learner’s know-how of science concepts in the classroom. Recommendations necessitate the use of cultural artifacts or cultural realia as culturally related instructional models—CRIMs—to teach and learn abstract science concepts. This approach tends to bring science closer to the indigenous learners’ consciousness, thereby enabling more familiarity with concrete or abstract science concepts. Eventually, the goal of helping learners to learn science concepts effectively stems from the standpoint of learners being active rather than being passive participants in the teaching and learning process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baltzer, S. (2013). Kids’ room color wisdom: How colors affect behavior. Retrieved from https://www.houzz.com/ideabooks/16866284/list/kids-room-color-wisdom-how-colors-affect-behavior. Retrieved 4 January 2017.

  2. Barnhardt, R. (2013). Indigenous education renewal in rural Alaska. In J. Reyhner, J. Martin, L. Lockard, & W. S. Gilbert (Eds.), Honoring our children: Culturally appropriate approaches to indigenous education (pp. 11–20). Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Battiste, M., & Henderson, J. (2009). Naturalizing indigenous knowledge in Eurocentric education. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 32(1), 5–18, 129–130.

  4. Borich, G. D. (2007). Effective teaching methods, unit and lesson planning (6th ed.). London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bourdieu, P. (1978). Sport and social class. International Social Science Council,17(6), 819–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847801700603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourdieu, P. (1987). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Structures, habitus, power: Basis for a theory for symbolic power. In B. D. Nicholas, E. Geoff, & B. O. Sherry (Eds.), Culture/power/history: A reader in contemporary social theory (pp. 155–199). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507.006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Curriculum Assessment Policy Statements (CAPS). (2011). Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.za/Curriculum/CurriculumAssessmentPolicyStatements(CAPS).aspx). Retrieved 10 September 2015.

  11. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fairclough, N. (2004). Semiotic aspects of social transformation and learning. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 225–236). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fakoyede, S. J. (2018). Possibilities of using beads and beadwork (cultural artifacts) as instructional models in the teaching and learning of life sciences. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Witwatersrand, South Africa.

  15. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education,25(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X025001099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Graziano, W. G., Bruce, J., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Attraction, personality, and prejudice: Liking none of the people most of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,93(4), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ladson-Billings, G. J. (2001). Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, O. (2003). Equity for linguistically and culturally diverse students in science education: A research agenda. Teachers College Record,105(3), 465–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Merriam, S. B. (2015). Qualitative research: Designing, implementing, and publishing a study. In V. C. X. Wang (Ed.). Handbook of research on scholarly publishing and research methods (pp. 125–140). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meyer, X., & Crawford, B. A. (2011). Teaching science as a cultural way of knowing: Merging authentic inquiry, nature of science, and multicultural strategies. Cultural Studies of Science Education,6, 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9318-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mhakure, D., & Otulaja, F. S. (2017). Culturally-responsive pedagogy in science education: Narrowing the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. In F. S. Otulaja & M. B. Ogunniyi (Eds.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in science education in sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 81–100). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  27. NCS. (2011). National curriculum statements (NCS) grades R—12. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.za/Curriculum/NationalCurriculumStatementsGradesR-12.aspx. Retrieved 10 September 2015.

  28. O’hara, K. E. (2014). Unraveling technology use in urban schools. In K. Tobin & A. Shady (Eds.), Transforming urban education: Urban teachers and students working collaboratively (pp. 71–88). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Owusu-Ansah, F. E., & Mji, G. (2013). African indigenous knowledge and research. African Journal of Disability,2(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v2i1.30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Parsons, E. C. (2008). Learning contexts, black cultural ethos, and the science achievement of African American students in an urban middle school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,45(6), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sewell, W. H. J. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tobin, K. (2005). Urban science as a culturally and socially adaptive practice. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students, and researchers (pp. 21–42). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tobin, K. (2006). Aligning the cultures of teaching and learning science in urban high schools. Cultural Studies of Science Education,1, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-005-9008-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Turner, J. H. (2002). Face-to-face: Towards a sociological theory of interpersonal behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Van Oers, B. (2014). Cultural–historical perspectives on play: Central ideas. In L. Brooker, S. Edwards, & M. Blaise (Eds.), The sage handbook of play and learning in early childhood (pp. 56–66). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1977). The development of higher psychological function. Soviet Psychology, 15(3), 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Educational psychology. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology,42(1), 7–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2004.11059210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wong, H. K., & Wong, R. T. (2009). The first days of school: How to be an effective teacher. Mountain View, CA: Harry K. Wong Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wylie, C., & Thompson, J. (2003). The Long-term contribution of early childhood education to children’s performance–evidence from New Zealand. International Journal of Early Years Education,11(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966976032000066109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Femi S. Otulaja.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lead Editor: Alejandro J. Gallard M.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fakoyede, S.J., Otulaja, F.S. Beads and beadwork as cultural artifacts used in mediating learners’ agentic constructs in science classrooms: a case for place-based learning. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 15, 193–210 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09911-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Place-based learning
  • Cultural artifacts/realia
  • Positive emotional energy
  • Expanded constructs
  • Contextualized classroom interactions