Abstract
Over the past decade, neoliberal practices for ensuring teacher effectiveness have shaped the landscape of education. In the midst of policy mandates for highly effective teachers, a biopolitical movement also undergirds the desire for a particular kind of ideal classroom. Grounded in traditions of scientism, beginning science teachers and their practices are implicitly and explicitly subjected to biopolitical control. The central question of this research includes: How does the desire to standardized science teacher practice through regular government-mandated evaluation of science teacher teachers produce biopolitical subjects? Using post-qualitative inquiry, this study examines ethnographic moments with one beginning science teacher alongside one teacher evaluation rubric used for formal teacher evaluation to explore ontological considerations for the implicated subjects. By illuminating the intra-active relationship between micro- and macro-discourses within one high school science classroom, the depths to which biopower functions is made visible. The paper concludes by calling science teacher educators and those responsible for their induction to examine the multifaceted ethical dilemmas inherently shaping their work with beginning science teachers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
Ball, S. J., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education,54(1), 85–96.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bazzul, J. (2014). Science education as a site for biopolitical engagement and the reworking of subjectivities: Theoretical consideration and possibilities for research. In L. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education (pp. 37–53). Dorderecht: Springer.
Bazzul, J., & Kayumova, S. (2015). Toward a social ontology for science education: Introducing Deleuze and Guattari’s assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1013016. (online first - ahead-of-print).
Brewer, T. J. (2014). Accelerated burnout: How Teach for America’s academic impact model and theoretical culture of accountability can foster disillusionment among its corps members. Education Studies,50, 246–263.
Buras, K. (2015). Charter schools, race, and urban space: Where market meets grassroots resistance. New York: Routledge.
Carter, L. (2014). The elephant in the room: Science education, neoliberalism and resistance. In L. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education (pp. 23–36). Dorderecht: Springer.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry,23(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416681864.
Dixson, A. D., Buras, K. L., & Jeffers, E. K. (2015). The color of reform: Race, education reform, and charter schools in post-Katrina New Orleans. Qualitative Inquiry,21(3), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414557826.
Foucault, M. (1970). Discipline and punishment: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1981). The history of sexuality, Vol. 2: An introduction, trans. Robert Hurley. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Foucault, M., & Senellart, M. (2010). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Colle`ge de France, 1978–1979. New York: Picador.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M.B. Ramos, Trans.). New York, NY: Bloomsbury. (Original work published 1968).
Giroux, H. (2013). Beyond dystopian education in a neoliberal society. Fast Capitalism, 10(1). Retrieved from https://www.uta.edu/huma/agger/fastcapitalism/10_1/giroux10_1.html.
Gough, N. (2004). RhizomANTically becoming-cyborg: Performing posthuman pedagogies. Educational Philosophy and Theory,36, 253–265.
Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’? In L. Alcoff & E. Potter, (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). New York: Routledge.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,26(6), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788752.
Louisiana Department of Education. (2014). Louisiana teacher performance rubric. Retrieved from https://www.louisianabelieves.com/docs/default-source/key-compass-resources/2014-2015-compass-teacher-rubric.pdf?sfvrsn=14.
Macey, D. (2009). Rethinking biopolitics, race and power in the wake of Foucault. Theory, Culture, & Society,26(6), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349278.
Mazzei, L. A. (2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,26(6), 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788761.
Morar, N. (2014). Review of The Government of Life: Foucault, Biopolitics, and Neoliberalism, by V. Lemm & M. Vatter. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Retrieved from http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/57849-the-government-of-life-foucault-biopolitics-and-neoliberalism/.
Nordstrom, S. N. (2015). A data assemblage. International Review of Qualitative Research,8(2), 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2015.8.2.166.
Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2006). Biopower today. Biosocieties,1, 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855206040014.
Ravitch, D. (2011). The death and life of the American school system. New York: Basic Books.
Springgay, S., & Truman, S. (2017). On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles, (in) tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry,00, 1–19.
St. Pierre, E. A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. Qualitative Studies in Education,13(5), 477–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050156422.
Wallace, M. F. G. (2017). Subjects in the threshold: Opening-up ethnographic moments that complicate the novice/veteran science teacher binary. Issues in Teacher Education,26(3), 96–110.
Wallace, M. F. G. (2018). The paradox of un/making science people: Practicing ethico-political hesitations in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9831-3.
Williams, J. (2014). More Louisiana teachers earn effective rating under subjective evaluation. The Times-Picayune. Retrieved January 22, 2017 from http://www.nola.com/education/index.ssf/2014/10/more_louisiana_teachers_earn_e.html.
Youngblood-Jackson, A. (2013). Posthumanist data analysis of mangling practices. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,26(6), 741–748.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead editor: I. Martins
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wallace, M.F.G. Showtime: the biopolitical performance of ‘effective beginning science teacher’. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 14, 963–980 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9885-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9885-x