Abstract
Cecilia Caiman and Iann Lundegård’s research highlights that an important goal of education is to equip younger generations with tools for innovation. This specifically applies in the realm of science education, as younger generations will likely require a unique preparation and skillset to tackle the environmental issues they will face in young adulthood and beyond. In their article, the authors position imagination as a tool for innovation and infinite possibility in this realm, and they capture moments of children actively imagining or “blending” their ideas to illustrate their worthiness in the cause of sustainability. In this research, I also realize the value of children’s creative narratives on the path toward building a more collective ethic of environmental care. However, I emphasize that positioning children’s imaginative narratives in an education toward sustainability calls for the study of children’s identities-in-progress, and thus, a rigorous theorization of the context in which these narratives/selves are created. This, in turn, necessitates the use of situated and deep methodological approaches to capture and interpret children’s self-expressions. Through my use of Holland’s figured world concept and an ethnographic case study methodology, this research unpacks narratives similar to those presented in Cecilia and Iann’s research to reveal the complexity of children’s imaginative utterances in a school garden context. I consider the myriad of factors that shape children’s experiences and corresponding expressions to complicate and situate children’s expressions within the larger context of self and care development. Revealing this individualized and layered nature of identity and care development in environmental education research allows for the creation or replication of educational experiences and spaces where innovation and care development can occur.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bloome, D., Katz, L., & Champion, T. (2010). Young children’s narratives and ideologies of language in classrooms. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308216.
Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. (2000). In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171–200). Westport: Ablex Publishing.
Bourdieu, P. (1972). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. New York: Routledge.
Clayton, L. W., Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003). Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance on nature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage Publications.
Davies, B. (1994). Poststructuralist theory and classroom practice. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology. Chicago: Aldine.
Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Dyson, A. (1994). I’m gonna express myself: The politics of story in the children worlds. In A. H. Dyson & C. Genishi (Eds.), The need for story: Cultural diversity in classroom community (pp. 155–171). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
Elliot, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research. London: Sage Publications.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gandini, L. (2011). History, ideas, and basic principles: An interview with Loris Malaguzzi. In C. P. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. E. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed., pp. 27–72). Santa Barbara: Praeger.
Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education, 171(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748917100101.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Grieshaber, S. J., & Cannella, G. S. (2001). Embracing identities in early childhood education: Diversity and possibilities. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hatt, B. (2007). Street smarts vs. book smarts: The figured world of smartness in the lives of marginalized, urban youth. The Urban Review, 39(3), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0047-9.
Hawkins, B. (2002). Children’s drawing, self expression, identity and the imagination. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 21(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00318.
Hewett, V. M. (2001). Examining the Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012520828095.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Holland, D. C., & Lave, J. (2001). History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
James, A. (2007). Giving voice to children’s voices: Practices and problems, pitfalls and potentials. American Anthropologist, 109(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2007.109.2.261.
James, A., & Prout, A. (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: Falmer Press.
Janzen, M. (2008). Where is the (postmodern) child in early childhood education research? Early Years, 28(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575140802393827.
Jurow, A. S. (2005). Shifting engagements in figured worlds: Middle school mathematics students’ participation in an architectural design project. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1401_3.
Kitchell, A., Kempton, W., Holland, D., & Tesch, D. (2000). Identities and actions within environmental groups. Human Ecology Review, 7(2), 1–20.
Leitch, R. (2006). Limitations of language: Developing arts-based creative narrative in stories of teachers’ identities. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(5), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600600832270.
Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “Deep Theorizing” closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 53–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308319229.
Linehan, C., & McCarthy, J. (2001). Reviewing the “community of practice” metaphor: An analysis of control relations in a primary school classroom. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0802_02.
Malone, K. (2007). The bubble-wrap generation: Children growing up in walled gardens. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701581612.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation revised and expanded from qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nicolopoulou, A. (1997). Worldmaking and identity formation in children’s narrative play-acting. In B. D. Cox & C. Lightfoot (Eds.), Sociogenetic perspectives on internalization (pp. 157–187). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring, a feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Payne, P., & Wattchow, B. (2008). Slow pedagogy and placing education in posttraditional outdoor education. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 12(1), 25–38.
Penuel, W. R., & Wertsch, J. (1995). Vygotsky and identity formation: A sociocultural approach. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3002_5.
Riessman, C. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Rinaldi, C. (2005). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. New York: Routledge.
Robinson, C. (2007). Figured world of history learning in social studies methods classroom. The Urban Review, 39(2), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0046-x.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rubin, B. C. (2007). Learner identities amid figured worlds: Constructing (in)competence at an urban high school. The Urban Review, 39(2), 217–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0044-z.
Skinner, D., Bryant, D., Coffman, J., & Campbell, F. (1998). Creating risk and promise: Children’s and teachers’ co-constructions in the cultural world of kindergarten. The Elementary School Journal, 98, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1086/461897.
Skinner, D., Valsiner, J., & Holland, D. (2001). Discerning the dialogical self: A theoretical and methodological examination of a Nepali adolescent’s narrative. Qualitative Social Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.3.913.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sulsberger, M. J. (2009). Peer interaction and socialization: A look at young children’s relationships to nature and early environmental identity formation. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. (Unpublished pilot study).
Talburt, S. (2000). Subject to identity: Knowledge, sexuality, and academic practices in higher education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Thomashow, M. (1996). Ecological identity: Becoming a reflective environmentalist. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Urrieta, L. (2007). Identity production in figured worlds: How some Mexican Americans become Chicana/o activist educators. The Urban Review, 39(3), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0050-1.
Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and education. London: Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wake, S. (2008). “In the best interests of the child”: Juggling the geography of children’s gardens (between adult agendas and children’s needs). Children’s Geographies, 6(4), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280802338122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead editor: G. Glasson.
This is a response paper to Cecilia Caiman and Iann Lundegård’s paper, “Young Children’s Imagination in Science Education and Education for Sustainability”, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9811-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sulsberger, M.J. Gathering, interpreting, and positioning children’s narratives in environmental education research. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 13, 707–732 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9867-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9867-z