NGSS, disposability, and the ambivalence of science in/under neoliberalism
This paper explores the ambivalence of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and its Framework towards neoliberal governance. The paper examines the ways that the NGSS serves as a mechanism within neoliberal governance: in its production of disposable populations through testing and through the infusion of engineering throughout the NGSS to resolve social problems through technical fixes. However, the NGSS, like earlier standards, is reactionary to forces diminishing the power of institutional science (e.g., the AAAS) including neoliberal prioritizing market value over evidence. The NGSS explicitly takes on neoliberal junk science such as the anti-global-warming Heartland Institute.
KeywordsBiopolitics Standardization NGSS Neoliberalism Resistance Disposability Ethics
- Achieve, I. (2014). Next generation science standards. Retrieved December 28, 2014, from http://www.nextgenscience.org/.
- Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bell, P. (2014). Cultural dimensions of an equity strategy for the next generation science standards: Implementing models of hope and possibility. In Paper presented at the American Anthropology Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Bidwell, A. (2014). Climate change debate: Coming soon to a school near you. U.S. News & World Report.Google Scholar
- Bruder, J. (2014). The end of retirement: When you can’t afford to stop working. Harpers, 28–36.Google Scholar
- Charette, R. (2013). The STEM crisis is a myth. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved December 28, 2014, from http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/the-stem-crisis-is-a-myth.
- Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Department of Health, E. A. W. (1983). A nation at risk. Retrieved December 28, 2014, from https://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html.
- Editor. (2014). Prison nation. Retrieved December 28, 2014, from http://www.toledoblade.com/Featured-Editorial-Home/2014/01/08/Prison-nation.html.
- Fisher, J. A. (2009). Medical research for hire: The political economy of pharmaceutical clinical trials. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M., Senellart, M., & de France, Collège. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Goonitalke, S. (1993). Modern science and the periphery: The characteristics of dependent knowledge. In S. Harding (Ed.), The racial economy of science. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
- Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Harris, R., & Benincasa, R. (2014). U.S. science suffering from booms and busts in funding. Retrieved July 23, 2015, from http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2014/09/09/340716091/u-s-science-suffering-from-booms-and-busts-in-funding.
- Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Helms, R. (Ed.). (2002). Guinea pig zero: An anthology of the journal for human research subjects. New Orleans: Garrett County Press.Google Scholar
- Herzfeld, M. (1992). The social production of indifference: Exploring the symbolic roots of Western bureaucracy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
- Klein, N. (2007a). Disaster capitalism: The new economy of catastrophe. Harper’s Magazine, 47–58.Google Scholar
- Klein, N. (2007b). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism (1st ed.). New York: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt.Google Scholar
- Krugman, P. (1996). A country is not a company. Harvard Business Review, 40–50.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1983). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In K. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 141–170). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Layton, L. (2014). How Bill Gates pulled off the swift Common Core Revolution. Politics, Retrieved December 28, 2014, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-bill-gates-pulled-off-the-swift-common-core-revolution/2014/06/07/a830e32e-ec34-11e3-9f5c-9075d5508f0a_story.html.
- Mirowski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
- Noble, D. F. (1977). America by design: Science, technology, and the rise of corporate capitalism (p. xxvi). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
- No Child Left Behind [NCLB], Pub. L. No. 107–110 §115, 1425 Stat. (2002).Google Scholar
- Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (1st ed.). New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
- Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- U.S. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1984). A nation at risk. Cambridge: USA Research.Google Scholar
- Weinstein, M. (2001). Guinea pig pedagogy: Critiquing and re-embodying science/education from other standpoints. In A. Barton & M. Osborne (Eds.), Teaching science in diverse settings: Marginalized discourses and classroom practices. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar