Abstract
The field of citizen science is one of the fastest growing sectors in informal education, specifically because of the new opportunities that are now available within today’s digitized and networked world. This paper describes a unique co-created citizen science project, WeatherBlur, which brought fishermen, elementary students, and teachers from island and coastal communities together with research scientists via an online platform to share, analyze, and interpret data about the local impact of climate change. The project was designed utilizing a sociocultural learning approach that integrated communities of practice, knowledge building, funds of knowledge, and place-based education theory. The study aimed to understand how scientists, community members, and students interact to promote learning and collaboration within an online learning community. In addition, the study addressed the impact of the program on elementary student learning outcomes in earth science and graph interpretation. Data analyses suggest that the model implemented provided a high level of interactivity across all ages and groups, and increased students’ understanding of earth science and skills in graph interpretation. Findings are used to describe the utility of using citizen science projects in K-5 schools.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Introduction: Design-based research—putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.
Bonney, R., Ballard, H.L., Jordan, R., & McCallie, E. (2009a). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE inquiry group report. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).
Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., et al. (2009b). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9.
Cousins, J. B., Whitmore, E., & Shulha, L. (2013). Arguments for a common set of principles for collaborative inquiry in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 34(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214012464037.
Dickinson, J. L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R. L., Martin, J., et al. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1890/110236.
Environmental issues with geospatial technology (pp. 139–152). Netherlands: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-90-481-3931-6_9.
Fadel, C., & Lemke, C. (2006). Technology in schools: What the research says. A report from the Metiri Group, commissioned by Cisco Systems.
Gardiner, M. M., Allee, L. L., Brown, P. M., Losey, J. E., Roy, H. E., & Smyth, R. R. (2012). Lessons from lady beetles: accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen-science programs. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(9), 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1890/110185.
Gray, S., Nicosia, K., & Jordan, R. (2012). Lessons learned from citizen science in the classroom. A Response to “The future of citizen science.” Democracy and Education, 20(2). Retrieved from http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol20/iss2/14.
Gupte, M., Shankar, P., Li, J., Muthukrishnan, S., & Iftode, L. (2011). Finding hierarchy in directed online social networks. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on world wide web (pp. 557–566). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1963405.1963484.
Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6(2), 199–220.
Hakkarainen, K., & Sintonen, M. (2002). The interrogative model of inquiry and computer-supported learning. Science & Education, 11(1), 25–43.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Continuum.
Hewitt, J., & Teplovs, C. (1999). An analysis of growth patterns in computer conferencing threads. In Proceedings of the 1999 conference on computer support for collaborative learning. Palo Alto: International Society of the Learning Sciences. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1150240.1150269.
Howell-Richardson, C., & Mellar, H. (1996). A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses. Instructional Science, 24(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156003.
John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653266.
Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (2003). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lai, M., & Law, N. (2013). Questioning and the quality of knowledge constructed in a CSCL context: A study on two grade-levels of students. Instructional Science, 41(3), 597–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9246-1.
Louv, R. (2012). The nature principle: Human restoration and the end of nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.
Oshima, J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Collaborative learning processes associated with high and low conceptual progress. Instructional Science, 24(2), 125–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120486.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge Building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97–115). Cambridge University Press.
Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). A fifth discipline resource: Schools that learn. A Fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents, and Everyone Who Cares About Education.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802581676.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Martin Lodish, Nancy Miles, Marie Pryor, Jane Robertson, and Michael Weatherwax for assisting in the data collection and data coding for this study. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant numbers DRL#1217247 and DRL#1451315. We would also like to thank all of the outstanding teachers that worked hand-in-hand with us throughout the duration of this project, Laura Venger, Marci Train, Paula Johnson, Josh and Heidi Holloway, Kristin Westra, Nancy Earnest, Maggie Small, and Bev Johnson.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors confirm that they have no conflict of interest with CSSE, including any interest or relationship, financial or otherwise, that might be perceived as influencing an author’s objectivity is considered a potential source of conflict of interest.
Additional information
Lead editor: Ruth Kermish-Allen.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kermish-Allen, R., Peterman, K. & Bevc, C. The utility of citizen science projects in K-5 schools: measures of community engagement and student impacts. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 14, 627–641 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9830-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9830-4