Guided by sociocultural perspectives on the importance of place as a resource for learning, we investigated 14- and 15-year old students’ understandings of their community and water quality during a school-based watershed unit. Methods included a theory-driven thematic analysis of field notes and video transcripts from four biology classrooms, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 67 pairs of matched pre- and post-intervention mindmaps, and a content analysis of 73 student reflections. As they learned about water quality, learners recognized the relevance of the watershed’s health to the health of their community. Students acknowledged the impacts of local economically driven activities (e.g., natural gas wells, application of agrichemicals) and leisure activities (e.g., boating, fishing) on the watershed’s environmental health. As students learned in and about their watershed, they experienced both connections and tensions between their everyday experiences and the environmental problems in their community. The students suggested individual sustainability actions needed to address water quality issues; however, the students struggled to understand how to act collectively. Implications of rural experiences as assets to future environmental sciences learning are discussed as well as the implications of educational experiences that do not include an advocacy component when students uncover environmental health issues. We suggest further consideration is needed on how to help young people develop action-oriented science knowledge, not just inert knowledge of environmental problems, during place-based education units.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52. doi:10.1080/03057269608560077.
Anderson, D., Thomas, G. P., & Nashon, S. M. (2009). Social barriers to meaningful engagement in biology field trip group work. Science Education, 93, 511–534. doi:10.1002/sce.20304.
Appalachian Regional Commission. (no date). The appalachian region. Retrieved January 10, 2015, from http://www.arc.gov/appalachian_region/TheAppalachianRegion.asp.
Avery, L. M. (2013). Rural science education: Valuing local knowledge. Theory into Practice, 52, 28–35. doi:10.1080/07351690.2013.743769.
Avery, L. M., & Kassam, K. A. (2011). “Phronesis”: Children’s local rural knowledge of science and engineering. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26, 1–18. Retrieved, from http://jrre.vmhost.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/26-2.pdf.
Brundiers, K., & Wiek, A. (2011). Educating students in real-world sustainability research: vision and implementation. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 107–124. doi:10.1007/s10755-010-9161-9.
Carlone, H. B., Kimmel, S., & Tschida, C. (2010). A rural math, science, and technology elementary school tangled up in global networks of practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 447–476. doi:10.1007/s11422-009-9233-2.
Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Eijck, M., & Roth, W.-M. (2010). Towards a chronotopic theory of “place” in place-based education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 869–898. doi:10.1007/s11422-010-9278-2.
Erickson, F. (1985). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). Chicago: MacMillan.
Fox, J. (2010). Gasland [documentary film]. Brooklyn, NY: International WOW Company.
Gee, J. P. (2000–2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X032005019.
Hay, D. B. (2007). Using concept maps to measure deep, surface and non-learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 39–57. doi:10.1080/03075070601099432.
Hay, D., Kinchin, I., & Baker, S. (2008). Making learning visible: The role of concept mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 295–311. doi:10.1080/03075070802049251.
Jensen, B. B. (2010). Knowledge, action, and pro-environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 8, 325–334. doi:10.1080/13504620220145474.
Kinchy, A. J., & Perry, S. L. (2011). Can volunteers pick up the slack? Efforts to remedy knowledge gaps about the watershed impacts of Marcellus Shale gas development. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, 22, 303–339.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–260. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Levine Rose, S., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2012). Should great lakes city build a new power plant? How youth navigate socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 541–567. doi:10.1002/tea.21017.
Lim, M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2006). Science learning and a sense of place in a urban middle school. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 107–142. doi:10.1007/s11422-005-9002-9.
Membiela, P., DePalma, R., & Pazos, M. S. (2011). A sense of place in the science classroom. Educational Studies, 37, 361–364. doi:10.1080/03055698.2010.506340.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: using a qualitative approach to connect homes and families. Theory into Practice, 11, 132–141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534.
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them, technical report. IHMC CmapTools 2006-01, Rev 01-2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
Schafft, K., & Biddle, C. (2015). Opportunity, ambivalence, and youth perspectives on community change in Pennsylvania’s marcellus shale region. Human Organization, 74, 74–85. doi:10.17730/humo.74.1.6543u2613xx23678.
Semken, S. (2005). Sense of place and place-based introductory geoscience teaching for American Indian and Alaska Native undergraduates. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 149–157.
Shepardson, D. P., Wee, B., Priddy, M., Schellenberger, L., & Harbor, J. (2007). What is a watershed? Implications of student conceptions for environmental science education and the national science education standards. Science Education, 91, 554–578. doi:10.1002/sce.20206.
Sobel, D. (1996). Beyond ecophobia: reclaiming the heart in nature education (Vol. 1). Great Barrington, MA: Orion Society.
Tzou, C., Scalone, G., & Bell, P. (2010). The role of environmental narratives and social positioning in how place gets constructed for and by youth. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43, 105–119. doi:10.1080/10665680903489338.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The condition of education 2011 (NCES 2011-033). Retrieved online September 19, 2011, http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_sde.asp.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. New York: Plenum Press.
Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87, 112–143. doi:10.1002/sce.10044.
Lead Editors: L. Avery and D. Long.
This paper is part of the special issue Cultural Studies of Rural Science Education.
About this article
Cite this article
Zimmerman, H.T., Weible, J.L. Learning in and about rural places: Connections and tensions between students’ everyday experiences and environmental quality issues in their community. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 12, 7–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9757-1
- Science education
- Place-based education
- Environmental education
- Informal–formal connections
- Community-based learning