Learning in and about rural places: Connections and tensions between students’ everyday experiences and environmental quality issues in their community
- 976 Downloads
Guided by sociocultural perspectives on the importance of place as a resource for learning, we investigated 14- and 15-year old students’ understandings of their community and water quality during a school-based watershed unit. Methods included a theory-driven thematic analysis of field notes and video transcripts from four biology classrooms, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 67 pairs of matched pre- and post-intervention mindmaps, and a content analysis of 73 student reflections. As they learned about water quality, learners recognized the relevance of the watershed’s health to the health of their community. Students acknowledged the impacts of local economically driven activities (e.g., natural gas wells, application of agrichemicals) and leisure activities (e.g., boating, fishing) on the watershed’s environmental health. As students learned in and about their watershed, they experienced both connections and tensions between their everyday experiences and the environmental problems in their community. The students suggested individual sustainability actions needed to address water quality issues; however, the students struggled to understand how to act collectively. Implications of rural experiences as assets to future environmental sciences learning are discussed as well as the implications of educational experiences that do not include an advocacy component when students uncover environmental health issues. We suggest further consideration is needed on how to help young people develop action-oriented science knowledge, not just inert knowledge of environmental problems, during place-based education units.
KeywordsScience education Place-based education Environmental education Informal–formal connections Community-based learning
- Appalachian Regional Commission. (no date). The appalachian region. Retrieved January 10, 2015, from http://www.arc.gov/appalachian_region/TheAppalachianRegion.asp.
- Avery, L. M., & Kassam, K. A. (2011). “Phronesis”: Children’s local rural knowledge of science and engineering. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26, 1–18. Retrieved, from http://jrre.vmhost.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/26-2.pdf.
- Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Erickson, F. (1985). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). Chicago: MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Fox, J. (2010). Gasland [documentary film]. Brooklyn, NY: International WOW Company.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2000–2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.Google Scholar
- Kinchy, A. J., & Perry, S. L. (2011). Can volunteers pick up the slack? Efforts to remedy knowledge gaps about the watershed impacts of Marcellus Shale gas development. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, 22, 303–339.Google Scholar
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
- Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them, technical report. IHMC CmapTools 2006-01, Rev 01-2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.Google Scholar
- Sobel, D. (1996). Beyond ecophobia: reclaiming the heart in nature education (Vol. 1). Great Barrington, MA: Orion Society.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The condition of education 2011 (NCES 2011-033). Retrieved online September 19, 2011, http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_sde.asp.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar