References
Abrams, E., Yen, C.-F., Blatt, E., & Ho, L. (2010). Unpacking the complex influences of schooling, sense of place and culture on the motivation of Taiwanese elementary students to learn science in school: Using a socio-cultural approach with phenomenological research methodologies. In D. Zandvliet (Ed.), Diversity in environmental education (pp. 103–129). London: Sense Publications.
Abrams, E., Yore, L. D., Bang, M., Brayboy, B., Castagno, A., Kidman, J., Lee, H., Villanueva, M. G., Wang, M. H., Webb, P., & Yen, C-F. (2014). Culturally relevant schooling in science for indigenous learners worldwide: Stressing the all in science literacy for all. In N. G. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 671–697). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Aikenhead, G. S. (2002). Whose scientific knowledge? The colonizer and the colonized. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 39–52). New York: Peter Lang.
Alaska Native Knowledge Network. (n.d). Culturally-based curriculum resources. Retrieved April 11, 2016 from http://ankn.uaf.edu/Resources/course/view.php?id=2.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. (n.d.). Research at AIATSIS. Retrieved April 11, 2016 from http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/research/ethical-research.
Ball, D. L., & Osborne, M. D. (1998). Teaching with difference: A response to Angela Calabrese Barton: Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 395–397. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199804)35:43.3.CO;2-8.
Barnhardt, R. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska native ways of knowing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36, 8–23. doi:10.1525/aeq.2005.36.1.008.
Bishop, R. (2008). Te kotahitanga: Kaupapa Māori in mainstream classrooms. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. Tuhiwai Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 439–458). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Buxton, C. A. (2005). Creating a culture of academic success in an urban science and math magnet high school. Science Education , 89(3), 392–417.
Cajete, G. (1988). Motivating American Indian students in science and math. Las Cruces: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
Cargo, M., Delormier, T., Lévesque, L., Horn-Miller, K., McComber, A., & Macaulay, A. C. (2008). Can the democratic ideal of participatory research be achieved? An inside look at an academic-indigenous community partnership. Health Education Research, 23, 904–914. doi:10.1093/her/cym077.
Emdin, C. (2006). Teaching and learning science in an urban school: Analogy as a key to communal science pedagogy. E-Yearbook of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 46, 46–52.
Emdin, C. (2011). Droppin’ science and dropping science: African American males and urban science education. Journal of African American Males in Education, 2, 66–80.
Fulkerson, G., & Thomas, A. R. (Eds.). (2014). Studies in urbanormativity: Rural community in urban society. Lanham: MD. Lexington Books.
Gilbert, A., & Yerrick, R. (2001). Same school, separate worlds: A sociocultural study of identity, resistance, and negotiation in a rural, lower track science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 574–598. doi:10.1002/tea.1019.
Hajdik, A. T. (2011). Agicultural romance: Constructing and consuming rural life in modern America. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Harmon, H. L., Henderson, S. A., & Royster, W. C. (2003). A research agenda for improving science and mathematics education in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18, 52–58.
Hudson, M., Milne, M., Reynolds, P., Russell, K., & Smith, B. (2010). Te Ara Tika—Guidelines for Māori research ethics: A framework for researchers and ethics committee members. Auckland, New Zealand: Health Research Council of New Zealand. Retrieved from www.hrc.govt.nz/sites/default/files/Te%20Ara%20Tika%20Guidelines%20for%20Maori%20Research%20Ethics.pdf.
Jacobs, B., Roffenbender, J., Collman, J., Cherry, K., Bitsòi, L. L., Bassett, K., & Evans, C. H, Jr. (2010). Bridging the divide between genomic science and indigenous peoples. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 38, 684–696.
Leap, W. L. (1982). Dimensions of math avoidance among American Indian elementary school students (pp. ED 244–ED 748). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Middleton, M., Dupuis, J., & Tang, J. (2012). Classrooms and culture: The role of context in shaping motivation and identity for science learning in Indigenous adolescents. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 111–141. doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9385-5.
Oliver, J. S., & Hodges, G. (2014). Rural science education: New ideas, redirections, and broadened definitions. In N. G. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 266–283). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Roth, W. M., Tobin, K., & Zimmermann, A. (2002). Coteaching/cogenerative dialoguing: Learning environments research as classroom praxis. Learning Environments Research, 5, 1–28.
Sarche, M., Novins, D., & Belcourt-Dittloff, A. (2010). Engaged scholarship with tribal communities. In H. E. Fitzgerald, C. Burack, & S. Seifer (Eds.), Handbook of engaged scholarship: Contemporary landscapes, future directions (Vol. 1, pp. 215–233). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (n.d.). Aboriginal research. Retrieved from www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/programs-programmes/priority_areas-domaines_prioritaires/aboriginal_research-recherche_autochtone-eng.aspx.
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, UK: Zed.
United States Department of Education (2010). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/accountability/schools/accountability.html.
Walker, R. (2007). Sociocultural perspectives on academic regulation and identity: Theoretical issues. In Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Budapest, Hungary.
Young, D. J. (2000). Rural and urban differences in student achievement in science and mathematics: A multileveled analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 386–418. doi:10.1080/0924345980090403.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editors: L. Avery and D. Long.
This paper is part of the special issue Cultural Studies of Rural Science Education.
This review essay addresses issues raised in Avery & Hains’s paper entitled: Oral traditions: a contextual framework for complex science concepts. doi:10.1007/s11422-016-9761-5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abrams, E., Middleton, M. Towards multidimensional approaches to research on rural science education. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 12, 167–176 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9748-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9748-2