Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 127–146 | Cite as

John Falk and Lynn Dierking: building the field of informal/free-choice science education

  • Léonie J. Rennie
Key Contributors


This article establishes the importance of “context”, a concept that underpins the academic contributions that John Falk and Lynn Dierking have made in building the field of informal/free-choice learning in science education. I consider, in turn, the individual contributions made by each of them prior to their seminal co-authored work, entitled The Museum Experience. I then document their joint contributions to the field, pointing out that although their interests and skills overlap in complementary ways to produce their jointly authored works, both have continued to make their individual contributions; Falk in his work on identity and impact, and Dierking in her work on community, youth, family and equity. Finally I come to the present, describing how they each continue their research and publication in lifelong, life-wide, and life-deep learning, with a particular focus on free-choice learning and the role it can play in addressing critical issues in the world.


Free-choice Informal science education Life-long learning 


  1. Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2007). Learning in a personal context: Levels of choice in a free choice learning environment in science and natural history museums. Science Education, 91, 75–95. doi: 10.1002/sce.20174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dierking, L. D., Falk, J. H., Rennie, L., Anderson, D., & Ellenbogen, K. (2003). Policy statement of the “Informal Science Education” Ad Hoc Committee. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 108–111. doi: 10.1002/tea.10066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Falk, J. H. (1971). Guarding your thermometers. American Biology Teacher, 33, 295–296. doi: 10.2307/4443471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Falk, J. H. (1974). Estimating experimenter induced bias in field studies: A cautionary tale. Oikos, 25, 374–378. doi: 10.2307/3543959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falk, J. H. (1976). Energetics of a suburban lawn ecosystem. Ecology, 57, 141–150. doi: 10.2307/1936405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Falk, J. H. (1983). Time and behavior as predictors of learning. Science Education, 67, 267–276. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730670214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Falk, J. H. (1997). Recent advances in the neurosciences: Implications for visitor studies. In M. Wells & R. Loomis (Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research and practice (Vol. 9, pp. 227–238). Jacksonville, AL: Visitor Studies Association.Google Scholar
  8. Falk, J. H. (Ed.). (2001). Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  9. Falk, J. H. (2004). The director’s cut: Towards an improved understanding of learning from museums. Science Education, 88, S83–S96. doi: 10.1002/sce.20014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Falk, J. H. (2009). Identity and the museum visitor experience. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  11. Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (1982). The field trip milieu: Learning and behavior as a function of contextual events. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, DC: Whalesback Books.Google Scholar
  13. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (Eds.). (1995). Public institutions for personal learning: Establishing a research agenda. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.Google Scholar
  14. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  15. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Lessons without limit: How free-choice learning is transforming education. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  16. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2012). Lifelong science learning for adults: The role of free-choice experiences. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 2, pp. 1063–1079). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). The museum experience revisited. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  18. Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., & Foutz, S. (Eds.). (2007). In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  19. Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., Osborne, J., Wenger, M., Dawson, E. & Wong, B. (2015). Analyzing science education in the U.K.: Taking a system-wide approach. Science Education, 99, 145–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Falk, J. H., Koran, J. J, Jr., & Dierking, L. D. (1986). The things of science: Assessing the learning potential of science museums. Science Education, 70, 503–508. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730700504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Falk, J. H., Koran, J. J, Jr., Dierking, L. D., & Dreblow, L. (1985). Predicting visitor behavior. Curator, 28, 326–332. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1985.tb01753.x.Google Scholar
  22. Falk, J. H., Martin, W. W., & Balling, J. D. (1978). The novel field trip phenomenon: Adjustment to novel settings interferes with task learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15, 127–134. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660150207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Falk, J. H., & Needham, M. D. (2013). Factors contributing to adult knowledge of science and technology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 431–452. doi: 10.1002/tea.21080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Falk, J. H., Reinhard, E. M., Vernon, C. L., Bronnenkant, K., Heimlich, J. E., & Deans, N. L. (2007). Why zoos & aquariums matter: Assessing the impact of a visit. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos & Aquariums.Google Scholar
  25. Falk, J. H., Scott, C., Dierking, L., Rennie, L., & Jones, M. C. (2004). Interactives and visitor learning. Curator, 47, 171–198. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00116.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Falk, J. H., & Storksdieck, M. (2005). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 89, 744–778. doi: 10.1002/sce.20078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  28. Koran, J. J, Jr., & Dierking-Shafer, L. (1982). Learning science in informal settings outside the classroom. In M. B. Rowe (Ed.), Science in the 80’s (pp. 52–62). Washington, DC: National Education Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 218 096).Google Scholar
  29. Koran, J. J, Jr., Longino, S. J., & Shafer, L. D. (1983). A framework for conceptualizing research in natural history museums and science centers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 325–339. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660200407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCreedy, D., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). Cascading influences: Long-term impacts of informal STEM programs for girls. Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Science Museum Press.Google Scholar
  31. National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  32. Phipps, M. (2010). Research trends and findings from a decade (1997–2007) of research on informal science education and free-choice science learning. Visitor Studies, 13, 3–22. doi: 10.1080/10645571003618717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rennie, L. J., & Feher, E. (2003). Informal education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 105–256. (special issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tal, T., & Dierking, L. D. (2014). Science learning in everyday life. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 251–406. (special issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations