Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A well-started beginning elementary teacher’s beliefs and practices in relation to reform recommendations about inquiry-based science

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given reform recommendations emphasizing scientific inquiry and empirical evidence pointing to the difficulties beginning teachers face in enacting inquiry-based science, this study explores a well-started beginning elementary teacher’s (Sofia) beliefs about inquiry-based science and related instructional practices. In order to explore Sofia’s beliefs and instructional practices, several kinds of data were collected in a period of 9 months: a self-portrait and an accompanying narrative, a personal philosophy assignment, three interviews, three journal entries, ten lesson plans, and ten videotaped classroom observations. The analysis of these data showed that Sofia’s beliefs and instructional practices were reform-minded. She articulated contemporary beliefs about scientific inquiry and how children learn science and was able to translate these beliefs into practice. Central to Sofia’s beliefs about science teaching were scientific inquiry and engaging students in investigations with authentic data, with a prevalent emphasis on the role of evidence in the construction of scientific claims. These findings are important to research aiming at supporting teachers, especially beginning ones, to embrace reform recommendations.

Περίληψη

Η παρούσα εργασία στηρίζεται σε σύγχρονες εισηγήσεις για εκπαιδευτική μεταρρύμιση στις Φυσικές Επιστήμες, οι οποίες δίνουν έμφαση στη μάθηση μέσω διερεύνησης, καθώς επίσης και σε ερευνητικά ευρήματα τα οποία καταδεικνύουν τις δυσκολίες που αντιμετωπίζουν οι νέοι εκπαιδευτικοί δημοτικής εκπαίδευσης. Βασισμένη στη μεθοδολογική προσέγγιση της μελέτης περίπτωσης, η εργασία αυτή εξετάζει τις πεποιθήσεις και τις διδακτικές πρακτικές μίας εξαίρετης εκπαιδευτικού, της Σοφίας, για τη μάθηση μέσω διερεύνησης. Σε χρονική περίοδο εννέα μηνών, είχαν συλλεχθεί δεδομένα από ποικιλία μεθόδων: προσωπικό πορτραίτο και γραπτή εργασία, προσωπική φιλοσοφία διδασκαλίας, τρεις συνεντεύξεις, τρία αναστοχαστικά ημερολόγια, δέκα σχέδια μαθήματος και δέκα βιντεοσκοπημένα μαθήματα. Η ανάλυση των δεδομένων υποδεικνύει πως τόσο οι αντιλήψεις όσο και οι διδακτικές πρακτικές της Σοφίας εμπεριείχαν χαρακτηριστικά πλαισιωμένα από μεταρρυθμιστικές εισηγήσεις. Στο επίκεντρο των πεποιθήσεων της Σοφίας βρισκόταν η εμπλοκή των μαθητών σε επιστημονικές διερευνήσεις με αυθεντικά δεδομένα με σκοπό την ανάπτυξη επιστημονικών επεξηγήσεων και εξαγωγή συμπερασμάτων. Τα ευρήματα αυτά είναι σημαντικά ειδικά για ερευνητές που ασχολούνται με την κατάρτιση των εκπαιδευτικών και θέματα μεταρρύθμισης στις Φυσικές Επιστήμες.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alake-Tuenter, E., Biemans, H. J. A., Tobi, H., Wals, A. E. J., Oosterheert, I., & Mulder, M. (2012). Inquiry-based science education competencies of primary school teachers: A literature study and critical review of the American National Science Education Standards. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2609–2640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian College of Education. (2001). A national declaration for education 2001. Unicorn, 27(2), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avraamidou, L. (2013). Prospective elementary teachers’ science teaching orientations and experiences that impacted their development. International Journal of Science Education., 35(10), 1698–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avraamidou, L. (2014). Tracing a beginning elementary teacher’s science teaching identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(3), 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2005). Giving priority to evidence in science teaching: A first-year elementary teacher’s specialized knowledge and practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 965–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2010). In search of well-started beginning science teachers: Insights from two first year elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 661–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationships to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, K., & Jones, L. (1998). The subject matter knowledge of preservice science teachers. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 707–718). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M. (1990). Making subject matter part of the conversation in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, C. T., Biggers, M., & Zangori, L. (2013). Investigating essential characteristics of scientific practices in elementary science learning environments: The practices of science observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics, 113(4), 180–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., & Tan, A.-L. (2011). Rethinking difficulties of teaching inquiry-based practical work: Stories from elementary pre-service teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 465–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1318–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (1994). Bridging the gap: An analysis of the needs of second-year science teachers. Science Education, 78(4), 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. (2007). Minding the gap: Needed research on beginning/newly qualified science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 532–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A., Dubois, S. L., Nixon, R., & Campbell, B. J. (2015). Supporting newly hired teachers of science: Attaining teacher professional standards. Studies in Science Education, 1(1), 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, J. R., Parker, C., & Graeber, A. O. (2004). A cultural perspective of the induction of five reform-minded beginning mathematics and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 720–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon, C. L., Lee, Y. J., Tan, A. L., & Lim, S. S. L. (2012). Knowing inquiry as practice and theory: Developing a pedagogical framework with elementary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, C. (2009). Developing preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge and practices through modeling-centered scientific inquiry. Science Education, 93(4), 720–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, C. V., & Gwekwerere, Y. N. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modelling instructional framework (EIMA) to support pre-service K-8 science teaching. Science Education, 91(1), 158–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, P. E., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, T., Finnegan, B., Crockett, D., et al. (1999). Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 930–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. K., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms? Elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 396–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, E. R. (2010). Qualitative research: How things work. NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, M. M., & Gregory, B. (2013). Elementary teachers’ classroom practices and beliefs in relation to US science education reform: Reflections from within. International Journal of Science Education, 35(11), 1800–1823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C. S. (2014). Overview of the role of teacher beliefs in science education. In R. Evan, J. Luft, C. Czerniak, & C. Pea (Eds.), The role of science teachers’ beliefs in international classrooms (pp. 17–31). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucy Avraamidou.

Additional information

Lead Editor: M. Espinet.

Appendix

Appendix

First semi-structured interview protocol

  • Tell me about yourself as a teacher of science. How do you envision yourself to be teaching science?

  • How will your classroom look like?

  • What kind of approaches will you be using?

  • What does your self-portrait show? Provide explanations

  • Elaborate on your personal science teaching philosophy. Provide explanations.

  • How do you think learn science best?

  • What’s your view about reform recommendations emphasizing scientific inquiry?

  • What are advantages of the inquiry-based approach to science teaching?

Second semi-structured interview protocol

  • Describe your experience as a substitute teacher so far? How is the school culture?

  • What are the goals of this unit?

  • How does the design of this unit relate to your personal science teaching philosophy?

  • Do you feel confident, ready and well-prepared to teach this unit?

  • Do you feel confident in teaching this unit using an inquiry-based approach?

  • Did you follow the curriculum when designing this unit? If you made modifications what kinds of modifications did you make?

  • Do you have any worries or concerns about enacting this unit?

This semi-structured interview protocol

  • How do you rate the overall enactment of the unit? Was it successful or not? Explain.

  • Were the goals of the unit met? Provide examples.

  • What in your opinion were the strengths of the unit? Provide examples.

  • What in your opinion were the weakenesses of the unit? Provide examples

  • What things you would do differently? Explain why.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avraamidou, L. A well-started beginning elementary teacher’s beliefs and practices in relation to reform recommendations about inquiry-based science. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 12, 331–353 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9700-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9700-x

Keywords

Navigation