Abstract
This review explores Archer, Dawson, Seakins, and Wong’s “Disorienting, fun or meaningful? Disadvantaged families’ experiences of a science museum visit” by examining the analytic frameworks guiding this study. To expand on Archer et al.’s use of feminist post-structuralist theories of identity we draw from the theory of intersectionality to provide a more robust framework for analyzing barriers to engagement within an informal learning space. Our response to this work ends by exploring the types of solutions generated from an intersectionality framework—solutions aimed at transforming institutional programs and practices to create more equitable spaces for learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anthias, F. (2013). Moving beyond the Janus face of integration and diversity discourses: Towards an intersectional framing. The Sociological Review, 61, 323–343. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12001.
Anzaldúa, G. (1999). Borderlands: la frontera. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
Bakhtin, M. (2010). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. New York: University of Texas Press.
Barnhardt, R. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska native ways of knowing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36, 8–23. doi:10.1525/aeq.2005.36.1.008.
Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50–73. doi:10.1002/tea.20269.
Beckett, L., Glass, R., & Moreno, A. (2013). A pedagogy of community building: Re-imagining parent involvement and community organizing in popular education efforts. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 6, 5–14.
Bishop, J. (2012). “She’s always been the smart one. I’ve always been the dumb one”: Identities in the mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43, 34–74. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.43.1.0034.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
Brickhouse, N., & Potter, J. (2001). Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965–980. doi:10.1002/tea.1041.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7, 585–614. doi:10.1177/1461445605054407.
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. doi:10.1002/tea.20237.
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography: A school of American research advanced seminar. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. doi:10.2307/1229039.
Deetz, S., & Simpson, J. (2004). Critical organizational dialogue: Open formation and the demand of “otherness”. In R. Anderson, L. Baxter, & K. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogic approaches to communication (pp. 141–158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280–299. doi:10.17763/haer.58.3.c43481778r528qw4.
Delpit, L. (2006). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.
Eisenhart, M. (2001). Changing conceptions of culture and ethnographic methodology: Recent thematic shifts and their implications for research on teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), The handbook of research on teaching (pp. 209–225). Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.
Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 261–295. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.clemson.edu/stable/1163285.
Emdin, C. (2009). Urban science classrooms and new possibilities: On intersubjectivity and grammar in the third space. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 239–254. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9162-5.
Espinosa, L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 209–241. doi:10.17763/haer.81.2.92315ww157656k3u.
Gilbert, A., & Yerrick, R. (2001). Same school, separate worlds: A sociocultural study of identity, resistance, and negotiation in a rural, lower track science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 574–598. doi:10.1002/tea.1019.
Hand, V. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76, 449–475. doi:10.3102/00346543076004449.
Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms and epistemologies (race, gender and science). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Hewson, P., Kahle, J., Scantlebury, K., & Davies, D. (2001). Equitable science education in urban middle schools: Do reform efforts make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1130–1144. doi:10.1002/tea.10006.
Irizarry, J. (2007). Ethnic and urban intersections in the classroom: Latino students, hybrid identities, and culturally responsive pedagogy. Multicultural Perspectives, 9, 21–28. doi:10.1080/15210960701443599.
Irizarry, J., & Antrop-González, R. (2008). Ricanstructing the discourse and promoting school success: Extending a theory of culturally responsive pedagogy for diasporicans. Hispanic Health Care International, 6(4), 172–184. doi:10.1891/1540-4153.6.4.172.
Jani, J., Pierce, D., Ortiz, L., & Sowbel, L. (2011). Access to intersectionality, content to competence: Deconstructing social work education diversity standards. Journal of Social Work Education, 47, 283–301. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900118.
Jegede, O., & Aikenhead, G. (1999). Transcending cultural borders: Implications for science teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17, 45–66. doi:10.1080/0263514990170104.
Lee, O., & Buxton, C. (2011). Engaging culturally and linguistically diverse students in learning science. Theory into Practice, 50, 277–284. doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.607379.
Nieto, S. (2005). Why we teach. New York: Teachers College Press.
Olivos, E. (2006). The power of parents: A critical perspective of bicultural parent involvement in public schools. New York: Peter Lang.
Özbilgin, M., Beauregard, T. A., Tatli, A., & Bell, M. (2011). Work–life, diversity and intersectionality: A critical review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 177–198. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00291.x.
Popkewitz, T., & Brennan, M. (1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Rivera Maulucci, M., & Mensah, F. (2015). Naming ourselves and others. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 1–5.
Styhre, A., & Eriksson-Zetterquist, U. (2008). Thinking the multiple in gender and diversity studies: Examining the concept of intersectionality. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 23, 567–582. doi:10.1108/17542410810912690.
Tsouroufli, M., Rees, C. E., Monrouxe, L. V., & Sundaram, V. (2011). Gender, identities and intersectionality in medical education research. Medical Education, 45(3), 213–216.
Van der Hoogte, L., & Kingma, K. (2004). Promoting cultural diversity and the rights of women: The dilemmas of ‘intersectionality’ for development organisations. Gender & Development, 12, 47–55. doi:10.1080/13552070410001726516.
Wacquant, L. (2005). Habitus. In J. Becket & Z. Milan (Eds.), International encyclopedia of economic sociology. London: Routledge.
Wertsch, J. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on a socially shared cognition (pp. 85–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10096-004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editor: A. Sharma.
This paper is part of a forum and is a response to Archer, Dawson, Seakins, and Wong's article “Disorienting, fun or meaningful? Disadvantaged families’ experiences of a science museum visit”. doi:10.1007/s11422-015-9667-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyons, R., Dsouza, N. & Quigley, C. Viewing equitable practices through the lens of intersecting identities. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 11, 941–951 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9699-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9699-z