References
Allchin, D. (2004). Should the sociology of science be rated X? Science Education, 88, 934–946.
Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York: Routledge.
Brush, S. G. (1974). Should the history of science be rated X? Science, 183, 1164–1172.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2003). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 199–258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Giroux, H. A. (1992). Literacy, pedagogy, and the politics of difference. College Literature, 19, 1–11.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: The Cornell University Press.
Kyle, W. C. (1997). Editorial: Action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 669–671.
“paradoxical, adj.” (September 2013). OED online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved November 10, 2013, from http://www.oed.com.ezproxy.lib.calpoly.edu/view/Entry/137359?redirectedFrom=paradoxical&.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead editor: M. Weinstein
This review essay addresses issues raised in Tang Wee Teo’s paper entitled: Inside versus outside the science classroom: examining the positionality of two female science teachers at the boundaries of science education. DOI: 10.1007/s11422-014-9581-4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lehr, J.L. Exploring the notion of the paradoxical in Tang Wee Teo’s “paradoxical positionality”. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 10, 403–409 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9583-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9583-2