Abstract
In this paper, I provide a window into the lived experience of a group of urban high school science students confronted with the stigma associated with special education, disability, and academic failure and present tools to understanding the ideological forces and institutional structures that undermine the ability of schools to create a culture of care and inclusion of children with disabilities. With the purpose of understanding the context of these students’ tainted social status within the school community, I draw connections between the ideological bipolarity and ambiguity of federal and state special education law and the lack of moral commitment at the local level to including and protecting the rights of children with disabilities in New York City schools. An important element of this paper is an exploration of a decade of neoliberal reform in the New York City Department of Education and the meticulously documented failure of New York City’s special education system to provide mandated services, adequately include special education students, and generally protect the rights of children with disabilities. I conclude that the ableism embedded in special education law and a lack of meaningful enforcement renders special education regulations intangible to administrators whereas neoliberal performance benchmarks are extremely salient due to the dire consequences for schools of not meeting them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Advocates for Children of New York. (2005). Leaving school empty handed: A report on graduation and dropout rates for students who receive special education services in New York City. New York: Advocates for Children of New York.
Advocates for Children of New York. (2007). Dead ends: The need for more pathways to graduation four overage, under-credited students in New York City. New York: Advocates for Children of New York.
Advocates for Children of New York. (2010). More than a statistic: Faces of the local diploma: a call to create pathways to graduation for all students. New York: Advocates for Children of New York.
ARISE Coalition. (2009). Educate! Include! Respect! A call for school system reform to improve the educational experiences of students with disabilities in New York City. New York: Action for Reform in Special Education Coalition.
ARISE Coalition. (2011). Out of school and unprepared: the need to improve support for students with disabilities transitioning to adulthood. New York: Action for Reform in Special Education Coalition.
Baglieri, S., Valle, J. W., Connor, D. J., & Gallagher, D. J. (2011). Disability studies in education: The need for a plurality of perspectives on disability. Remedial and Special Education, 32(4), 267–278.
Beratan, D. (2006). Institutionalizing inequity: Ableism, racism and IDEA 2004. Disability Studies Quarterly, 26(2). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/682/859.
Bloomberg, M. R., & Klein, J. I. (n. d.). A parent’s guide to special education services for school-age children: participating in your child’s education. New York: New York City Department of Education. Retrieved May 13, 2013 from http://schools.nyc.gov/documents/teachandlearn/ELL/Parent_Guide_English.pdf.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Citywide Council on Special Education. (2012). Annual report 2011–2012. New York: Citywide Council on Special Education.
Connor, D. J. (2012). Suspended in liminal space: Special education administrators and the decade of educational reform within the NYC school system. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 25(1), 25–37.
Daylight Forensic & Advisory. (2009). L.V. v. D.O.E. 03 Civ. 9917 (RJH). Stipulation and agreement of settlement: Independent auditor’s first benchmark report. New York: The New York City Department of Education.
de Blasio, B. (2012). Educating all students well: Special education reform in New York City public schools. New York: Office of the Public Advocate for the City of New York.
DeLorenzo, J. P. (2008). New York State Education Department memorandum: Continuum of special education services for school-aged children. New York: New York State Education Department.
DiNapoli, T. P. (2009). Waiting for special education. New York: New York State Comptroller.
Dudley-Marling, C. & Baker, D. (2012). The effects of market-based reforms on students with disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32(2). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3187/3072.
Fitch, F. (2010). Laggards, labeling and limitations: Re-connecting labeling deviance theory with Deweyan pragmatism. Philosophical Studies in Education, 41, 17–28.
Fulcher, G. (1989). Disabling policies? A comparative approach to education policy and disability. London: The Falmer Press.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Shuster.
Gotbaum, B. (2008). Overworked, underutilized: How the Department of Education’s reorganizations of special education turned school psychologists from mental health professionals into paper pushers. New York: Office of the New York City Public Advocate.
Hale, C. (2013). Educating teachers to fulfill the promise of special education law. PowerPlay: A Journal of Educational Justice, 5(1), 431–461.
Harries, G. (2009). Memo from Garth Harries, senior coordinator for special education to Joel Klein, chancellor: Recommendations to improve services to students with disabilities. New York: New York City Department of Education.
Hehir, T., Figueroa, R., Gamm, S., Katzman, L. I., Gruner, A., Karger, J., et al. (2005). Comprehensive management review and evaluation of special education. New York: The New York City Department of Education.
Hevesi, A. G. (2005). Services rendered to special education students: Report 2004-N-2. Albany, NY: State of New York, Office of the State Comptroller.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, § 612, 118 Stat. 2676 (2004).
Kaye, J. S. (2013). Keeping kids in school and out of court: Report and recommendations. New York: New York City School-Justice Partnership Task Force.
Kemple, J. J. (2013). The condition of New York City high schools: Examining trends and looking toward the future. New York: The Research Alliance for New York City Schools. Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development.
Kraft, M. (2004). Least restrictive environment: Policy analysis and case study of a high school art class. Visual Arts Research, 30(1), 22–34.
Liu, J. C., & Kim, T. (2012). Audit report on the procurement of direct student services by the Department of Education. New York: City of New York Office of the Comptroller.
Moroff, M. (2012). Testimony to be delivered to the New York City Council Committee on Education: On special education reform, June 12, 2012. New York: The ARISE Coalition.
Moskowitz, E. S. (2003). Too little too late: Special education in New York City. New York: The Council of the City of New York Committee on Education.
New York City Department of Education. (2009a). Educator guide to the New York City Progress Report: High school. New York: NYC Department of Education.
New York City Department of Education. (2009b). Special education service delivery report. New York: NYC Department of Education.
New York City Department of Education. (n.d.). Integrated co-teaching. New York: NYC Department of Education. Retrieved May 22, 2013, from http://schools.nyc.gov/Academics/SpecialEducation/programs/environment/ict.htm.
New York Civil Liberties Union. (2011). Analysis finds dramatic spike in NYC suspensions: Black children and students with special needs most affected. New York: American Civil Liberties Union of New York State.
New York State Education Law, NY Stat. § 200. (2013).
Ong-Dean, C. (2009). Distinguishing disability: Parents, privilege, and special education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Phillips, E. (2008). When parents aren’t enough: External advocacy in special education. The Yale Law Journal, 117(8), 1802–1853.
Scott, C., Duffrin, E., & Kelleher, M. (2009). Differentiating and simplifying: Transforming school restructuring under no child left behind in New York. New York: Center on Education Policy.
Silverman, M. (2007). Transition to nowhere: An analysis of the planning and provision of transition services to students with disabilities in New York City. New York: Advocates for Children of New York.
Strategic Support Team of the Council of the Great City Schools. (2008). Improving special education in New York City’s District 75. New York: Council of the Great City Schools.
Sweet, K. (2006). Small schools, few choices: How New York City’s high school reform effort left students with disabilities behind. New York: Parents for Inclusive Education.
Thompson, W. C. (2007). Audit report on the monitoring and tracking of special education services for elementary school students by the Department of Education. New York: The City of New York Office of Comptroller Bureau of Management.
Tobin, K., & Roth, W. M. (2006). Teaching to learn: A view from the field. Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishing.
United Federation of Teachers. (2010). Separate and unequal: the failure of New York City charter schools to serve the city’s neediest students. New York: United Federation of Teachers.
Walcott, D. M. (2012). The class of 2011 four-year longitudinal report and 2010–2011 event dropout rates. New York: New York City, Department of Education.
Wyckoff, L., Cooney, S. M., Djakovic, D. K., & McClanahan, W. S. (2008). Disconnected young people in New York City: Crisis and opportunity. New York: Public/Private Ventures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editor: G. Reis, special issue: Learning Possibilities for All: Sociocultural Perspectives on Special Science Education
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hale, C. Urban special education policy and the lived experience of stigma in a high school science classroom. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 10, 1071–1088 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9548-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9548-x