Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Collaborative online projects for English language learners in science

  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper summarizes how collaborative online projects (COPs) are used to facilitate science content-area learning for English Learners of Hispanic origin. This is a Mexico-USA partnership project funded by the National Science Foundation. A COP is a 10-week thematic science unit, completely online, and bilingual (Spanish and English) designed to provide collaborative learning experiences with culturally and linguistically relevant science instruction in an interactive and multimodal learning environment. Units are integrated with explicit instructional lessons that include: (a) hands-on and laboratory activities, (b) interactive materials and interactive games with immediate feedback, (c) animated video tutorials, (d) discussion forums where students exchange scientific learning across classrooms in the USA and in Mexico, and (e) summative and formative assessments. Thematic units have been aligned to U.S. National Science Education Standards and are under current revisions for alignment to the Common Core State Standards. Training materials for the teachers have been integrated into the project website to facilitate self-paced and independent learning. Preliminary findings of our pre-experimental study with a sample of 53 students (81 % ELs), distributed across three different groups, resulted in a 21 % statistically significant points increase from pretest to posttest assessments of science content learning, t(52) = 11.07, p = .000.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atwater, M. M. (1994). Equity for black Americans in precollege science. Science Education, 84(2), 154–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barba, R. H. (1993). A study of culturally syntonic variables in the bilingual/bicultural science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1053–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.bscs.org/about.

  • Bodley, J. H. (1997). Cultural anthropology: Tribes, states, and the global system. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, C. (1999). Designing a model-based methodology for science instruction: Lessons from a bilingual classroom. Bilingual Research Journal, 23(2–3), 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, I. M., & Beckett, E. C. (2003). Teacher preparation for equitable access through the integration of TESOL standards, multiple intelligences and technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(2), 249–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1981). Bilingualism and minority-language children. Toronto, Canada: OISE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, E. E. (1988). Effective schooling for language minority students (New Focus No. 1). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

  • Hampton, E., & Rodriguez, R. (2001). Inquiry science in bilingual classrooms. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), 461–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, C. B. (2005). Teaching in America: A cross-cultural guide for international teachers and their employers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75, 491–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1996). Interactional patterns of linguistically diverse students and teachers: Insights for promoting science learning. Linguistics and Education: An International Research Journal, 8, 269–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A learner-centered approach to multimedia explanations: Deriving instructional design principles from cognitive theory. Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 2(2). Retrieved from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2000/2/05/index.asp.

  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments special issue on interactive learning environments: contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 209–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). The Condition of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe.

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2011. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2011/2012465.asp.

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (1996). Review of instructional materials for middle school science. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Department of Education. (2011). Report CardStatewide Annual 2010–2011. Retrieved from http://www.ode.state.or.us/data/reportcard/reports.aspx.

  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakow, S. J., & Bermudez, A. B. (1993). Science is “Ciencia”: Meeting the needs of Hispanic American students. Science Education, 77, 547–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slattery, J. (2004). Counseling diverse clients, bringing context into therapy. Toronto, Ontario: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, H. N., & Zeidler, D. L. (2002). The effects of English language proficiency and scientific reasoning skills on the acquisition of science content knowledge by Hispanic English language learners and native English language speaking students. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(3). Retrieved from http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/torreszeidler.pdf.

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). The 2012 Statistical Abstract: The National Data Book Allegany County: NY. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2009/2009edition.html.

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://idea.ed.gov/explore/home.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatima E. Terrazas-Arellanes.

Additional information

Lead editors: Alejandro Gallard Martínez and Rene Antrop González.

Appendix

Appendix

What Your Body Needs, Stage 2, Lesson 2—Outline

What Your Body Needs, Stage 2, Lesson 2—Warm-up

What Your Body Needs, Stage 2, Lesson 2—Learning the content

What Your Body Needs, Stage 2, Lesson 2—Enhanced vocabulary

What Your Body Needs, Stage 2, Lesson 2—Interactive

What Your Body Needs, Stage 2, Lesson 2—Interactive Microscope

What Your Body Needs, Stage 2, Lesson 2—Lab Activity .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terrazas-Arellanes, F.E., Knox, C. & Rivas, C. Collaborative online projects for English language learners in science. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 8, 953–971 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9521-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9521-8

Keywords

Navigation