Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 953–971 | Cite as

Collaborative online projects for English language learners in science

  • Fatima E. Terrazas-ArellanesEmail author
  • Carolyn Knox
  • Carmen Rivas
Article

Abstract

This paper summarizes how collaborative online projects (COPs) are used to facilitate science content-area learning for English Learners of Hispanic origin. This is a Mexico-USA partnership project funded by the National Science Foundation. A COP is a 10-week thematic science unit, completely online, and bilingual (Spanish and English) designed to provide collaborative learning experiences with culturally and linguistically relevant science instruction in an interactive and multimodal learning environment. Units are integrated with explicit instructional lessons that include: (a) hands-on and laboratory activities, (b) interactive materials and interactive games with immediate feedback, (c) animated video tutorials, (d) discussion forums where students exchange scientific learning across classrooms in the USA and in Mexico, and (e) summative and formative assessments. Thematic units have been aligned to U.S. National Science Education Standards and are under current revisions for alignment to the Common Core State Standards. Training materials for the teachers have been integrated into the project website to facilitate self-paced and independent learning. Preliminary findings of our pre-experimental study with a sample of 53 students (81 % ELs), distributed across three different groups, resulted in a 21 % statistically significant points increase from pretest to posttest assessments of science content learning, t(52) = 11.07, p = .000.

Keywords

English learners Bilingual education Science learning Collaborative learning Technology 

References

  1. Atwater, M. M. (1994). Equity for black Americans in precollege science. Science Education, 84(2), 154–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barba, R. H. (1993). A study of culturally syntonic variables in the bilingual/bicultural science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1053–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.bscs.org/about.
  5. Bodley, J. H. (1997). Cultural anthropology: Tribes, states, and the global system. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Buxton, C. (1999). Designing a model-based methodology for science instruction: Lessons from a bilingual classroom. Bilingual Research Journal, 23(2–3), 147–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chisholm, I. M., & Beckett, E. C. (2003). Teacher preparation for equitable access through the integration of TESOL standards, multiple intelligences and technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(2), 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cummins, J. (1981). Bilingualism and minority-language children. Toronto, Canada: OISE Press.Google Scholar
  9. Garcia, E. E. (1988). Effective schooling for language minority students (New Focus No. 1). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.Google Scholar
  10. Hampton, E., & Rodriguez, R. (2001). Inquiry science in bilingual classrooms. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), 461–478.Google Scholar
  11. Hutchison, C. B. (2005). Teaching in America: A cross-cultural guide for international teachers and their employers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75, 491–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1996). Interactional patterns of linguistically diverse students and teachers: Insights for promoting science learning. Linguistics and Education: An International Research Journal, 8, 269–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A learner-centered approach to multimedia explanations: Deriving instructional design principles from cognitive theory. Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 2(2). Retrieved from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2000/2/05/index.asp.
  17. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments special issue on interactive learning environments: contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 209–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). The Condition of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe.
  19. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2011. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2011/2012465.asp.
  20. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  21. National Science Foundation. (1996). Review of instructional materials for middle school science. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  22. Oregon Department of Education. (2011). Report CardStatewide Annual 2010–2011. Retrieved from http://www.ode.state.or.us/data/reportcard/reports.aspx.
  23. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rakow, S. J., & Bermudez, A. B. (1993). Science is “Ciencia”: Meeting the needs of Hispanic American students. Science Education, 77, 547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Slattery, J. (2004). Counseling diverse clients, bringing context into therapy. Toronto, Ontario: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  26. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Torres, H. N., & Zeidler, D. L. (2002). The effects of English language proficiency and scientific reasoning skills on the acquisition of science content knowledge by Hispanic English language learners and native English language speaking students. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(3). Retrieved from http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/torreszeidler.pdf.
  28. U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). The 2012 Statistical Abstract: The National Data Book Allegany County: NY. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2009/2009edition.html.
  29. U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://idea.ed.gov/explore/home.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatima E. Terrazas-Arellanes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carolyn Knox
    • 1
  • Carmen Rivas
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Advanced Technology in EducationUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations