Abstract
This qualitative, sociocultural study examines how teacher preparation programs may have deliberate impact on science reform by unearthing the complex layers of diversity inherent in the contextual reality of education. This study was conducted in one of the largest school districts in the Southeastern United States, serving a predominately Hispanic population comprising 65 % of its student body, followed by African Americans at 24 %. The representative subjects utilized for this study were elementary education undergraduate students and later a percentage of the same subjects, as practicing teachers in the field. All subjects were exposed to inquiry based methodology in science teaching as part of their undergraduate studies with emphasis on the learning cycle, facilitation of student voice and exposure to the nature of science. The goal of science education was emphasized to students as purposeful in promoting scientific literacy. This study is framed by sociocultural theory grounded in a social constructivist paradigm with the understanding that science learning takes place within social and collaborative processes leading to internalization and greater sense of self-efficacy. The study examines the perception of education students’ beliefs about scientists as well as reflections on their own learning of science as elementary students themselves. As present practicing teachers, perspectives from their position in the field were obtained via interviews. Interviews served to elicit reflections on present practice as related to previous perceptions, in order to analyze whether these were pervasive in framing practice as well as self-perceptions related to science. A lack of change of these perceptions may underscore the importance of an emphasis on issues of gender, culture and social factors within teacher preparation, specific to science teaching and learning. Cognizance of such factors are believed to support internalization and hence greater understanding of the complexities framing science teaching and learning, leading to an actual paradigm shift in our elementary science classrooms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bourdieu, P. (1980). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of capital (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
Brown, C. S., & Leaper, C. (2010). Latina and European American girls’ experiences with academic sexism and their self-concepts in mathematics and science during adolescence. Sex Roles, 63(11–12), 860–870.
Bryan, L. A., & Atwater, M. M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Teacher Education, 86(6), 821–839.
Calabrese, B. A. (1998). Feminist science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Calabrese, B. A., & Brickhouse, N. W. (2006). Engaging girls in science. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), Handbook of gender and education (pp. 221–235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Calabrese, B. A., & Osborne, M. D. (2001). Teaching science in diversified settings: Marginalized discourses and classroom practices. Counterpoints: Studies in the postmodern theory of education. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Chang, K. (2012). Bias persists for women of science, a study finds. Source: The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/25/science/bias-persists-against-women-of-science-a-study-says.html?.
Feistreizer, C. E. (2011). Profile of teachers in the U.S. 2011. The National Center for Education Information. Retrieved from: http://www.ncei.com/Profile_Teachers_US_2011.pdf.
Gallard Martínez, A. J. (2009). Complexity and the universe of education. Forum on public Policy Education Online, Summer 2008 edition (January 2009). http://forumpublic policy/summer08papers/yourpapersname.pdf.
Gilbert, J. (2001). Science and its ‘other’: Looking underneath ‘woman’ and ‘science’ for new directions in research on gender and science education. Gender and Education, 13(3), 291–305.
Hartsock, N. (1998). The feminist standpoint revisited and other essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Henwood, F. (1996). WISE choices? Understanding occupational decision-making in a climate of equal opportunities for women in science and technology. Gender and Education, 8(2), 199–214.
John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206.
John-Steiner, V., Panofsky, C. P., & Smith, L. W. (1994). Sociocultural approaches to language and literacy: An interactionist perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sewell, Jr., W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.
Kennedy, M. M. (1999). The role of preservice teacher education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 54–86). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
League of United Latin American Citizens: LULAC National Education Policy Department. Chavez, I. & Valent, A. (2011, March 28). Science education and Latino students. Retrieved from http://lulac.org/blog/policy_education/.
Lemke, J. L. (2000). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. In D. Wong (Ed.), Special section: Perspectives on Learning Science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316.
Mayer, F., & Tetreault, M. (1994). Feminist classrooms. New York: Basic Books.
Roth, W. -M. & Tobin, K. (2007). Introduction, Part B: Gendered identities. In W-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Science, learning, identity (pp. 99–102). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Scantlebury, K. (2007). Outsiders within: Urban African American girls’ identity & science. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Science, learning, and identity: Sociocultural and cultural historical perspectives (pp. 121–134). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Szymanski Sumal, C., & Sumal, D. W. (2010). Science education and Hispanic English language learners: A research perspective. In D. W. Sumal, C. Szymanski Sumal, & E. Wright (Eds.), Teaching science with Hispanic ELLs in K-16 classrooms (pp. 1–10). United States: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
U.S. Department of Commerce, United States Census Bureau (2011). State and county quick facts. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/12/12086.html.
Vazquez-Nuttall, E., Romero-Garcia, I., & De Leon, B. (1987). Sex roles and perceptions of femininity and masculinity of Hispanic women: A review of the literature. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 409–425.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Vygotsky in context. In A. Kozulin (Ed.), Thought and language (pp. xi–lvi). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Original work published 1934).
Zapata, M., & Gallard, A. J. (2007). Female science teacher beliefs: Implications in relation to gender and pedagogical practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 923–985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead editors: Alejandro J. Gallard Martínez and Rene Antrop González.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zapata, M. Substantiating the need to apply a sociocultural lens to the preparation of teachers in an effort to achieve science reform. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 8, 777–801 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9513-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9513-8