Emily Martin’s (Signs J Women Cult Soc 16(31):485–501, 1991) article, “The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male–Female Roles,” was published in Signs over 20 years ago. In this groundbreaking article, she discusses how gender roles are often projected onto reproductive biology, leading to the portrayal of eggs as passive and sperm as active. We were interested in seeing if many of her findings are still relevant today. We analyzed science textbooks from the middle school to the medical school level to determine if fertilization in human reproduction is described in gender-biased language regarding the sentence structure, amount of information provided for female and male processes/parts, and neutrality in describing female and male processes/parts. Although there has been much improvement, there is still a long way to go. Sexist language in scientific textbooks is troubling because it negatively affects both female and male students and undermines teachers’ ability to teach in an accurate and gender-neutral way.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Allen, K. Z., Berg, L. R., Christopher, B., Dusheck, J., & Taylor, M. F. (2005). Animal reproduction. In Life science (pp. 685–694). Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Baker, R. (2000). The language of sex: Our conception of sexual intercourse. In A. Minas (Ed.), Gender basics: Feminist perspectives on women and men (2nd ed., pp. 307–311). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Bartholomew, E. F., & Martini, F. (2007). Development and inheritance. In Essentials of anatomy & physiology (pp. 644–647). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
Beauvoir, S. D. (1989). The second sex (H. M. Parshley, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
Berne, R. M., Levy, M. N., Koeppen, B. M., & Stanton, B. A. (2008). The male and female reproductive systems. In Berne & Levy physiology (pp. 785–790). Philadelphia, PA: Mosby/Elsevier.
Biggs, A., Hagins, W. C., Holliday, W. G., Kapicka, C. L., Lundgren, L., MacKenzie, A. H., et al. (2007). Human reproduction and development. Biology (pp. 1048–1055). New York: McGraw-Hill/Glencoe.
Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. (2006). Unit 4. BSCS biology: A human approach. Student edition (pp. 477-484). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Bolinger, D. (1973). Truth is a linguistic question. Language, 49(3), 539–550.
Boron, W. F., & Boulpaep, E. L. (2009). Transport of gametes and fertilization. Medical physiology:A cellular and molecular approach, Retrieved June 28, 2010, from www.studentconsult.net. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier.
Calkins, S., Johnson, N., & Light, G. (2012). Changing conceptions of teaching in medical faculty. Medical Teacher, 34, 902–906.
Cameron, D. (1990). Demythologizing sociolinguistics. In J. Joseph & T. Talyor (Eds.), Ideologies of language (pp. 79–93). London: Routledge.
Campbell, N. A., Reece, J. B., Taylor, M. R., & Simon, E. J. (2009). Human reproduction. Biology Concepts and Connections (pp. 536–545). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
Costigliola, F. (1997). “Unceasing pressure for penetration”: Gender, pathology, and emotion in George Kennan’s Formation of the Cold War. The Journal of American History, 83(4), 1309–1339.
Doan, A. E., & Williams, J. C. (2008). The politics of virginity: Abstinence in sex education. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Earp, B. D. (2012). The extinction of masculine generics. Journal for Communication and Culture, 2(1), 4–19.
Eddleman, S. (2007). Reproduction. In Life science (CPO science) (pp. 202–211). New Hampshire: CPO Science.
Ehrlich, S., & King, R. (1994). Feminist meanings and the (de)politicization of the lexicon. Language in Society, 23, 59–76.
Fiske, S. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 941–982). New Jersey: Wiley.
Frazier, N., & Sadker, M. (1973). Sexism in school and society. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Gilbert, S. F., & Fausto-Sterling, A. (2003). Educating for social responsibility: Changing the syllabus of development biology. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 47, 237–244.
Irvine, J. (2002). Talk about sex: The battles over sex education in the United States. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Jervey, E. D. (1987). The phallus and phallus worship in history. Journal of Popular Culture, 21(2), 103–115.
Kahle, J. B. (1985). Retention of girls in science: Case studies of secondary teachers. In J. B. Kahle (Ed.), Women in science: A report from the field. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
Kane, E. W., & Schippers, M. (1996). Men’s and women’s beliefs about gender and sexuality. Gender & Society, 10(5), 650–665.
Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kolodner, J. L., Krajcik, J. S., Edelson, D. C., Reiser, B. J., & Starr, M. L. (2009). Genetics. In Project-based inquiry science (pp. 192–193). Armonk, NY: It’s About Time.
Laqueur, T. W. (1990). Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lawrence, S. C., & Bendixen, K. (1992). His and hers: Male and female anatomy in anatomy texts for U.S. medical students, 1890–1989. Social Science and Medicine, 35(7), 925–934.
Leaper, C. (1995). The use of masculine and feminine to describe women’s and men’s behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135(3), 359–369.
Livia, A. (2000). Pronoun envy: Literary uses of linguistic gender (Vol. 2). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Martin, E. (1991). The egg and the sperm: How science has constructed a romance based stereotypical male-female roles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(31), 485–501.
Mast, C. K. (2001). Sex respect: The option of true sexual freedom. Student workbook. Bradley, IL: Respect Incorporated.
Metoyer, A. B., & Rust, R. (2011). The egg, sperm, and beyond: gendered assumptions in gynecology textbooks. Women’s Studies, 40(2), 177–205.
Moore, L. J. (2007). Sperm counts: Overcome by man’s most precious fluid. New York: New York University Press.
Moore, L. J., & Clarke, A. E. (1995). Clitorial conventions and transgressions: Graphic representations in anatomy texts, c1900–1991. Feminist Studies, 21(2), 255–301.
Moore, K. L., & Persaud, T. V. N. (2008). Transportation of the gametes and fertilization. Before we are born, Retrieved June 28, 2010, from www.studentconsult.net. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier.
Niemi, S. (1987). Andrology as a specialty: Its origin. Journal of Andrology, 8, 201–203.
Nowicki, S. (2008). Human biology. McDougal Littell biology (pp. 1024–1049). Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell.
Oudshoorn, N. (1990). Endocrinologists and the conceptualization of sex, 1920–1940. Journal of the History of Biology, 23(2), 163–186.
Oudshoorn, N. (2003). The male pill: A biography of a technology in the making. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
PBS. (1999–2002). American Experience, “Timeline: The Pill,” http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/timeline/. Accessed January 14, 2013.
Potter, E. F., & Rosser, S. V. (1992). Factors in life science textbooks that may deter girls’ interest in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(7), 669–686.
Rhoades, R., & Tanner, G. A. (2008). Fertilization, pregnancy, and fetal development. In Medical physiology (pp. 705–708). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Ruble, T. L. (1983). Sex stereotypes: Issues of change in the 1970s. Sex Roles, 9(3), 397–402.
Sadava, D. H., Heller, C., Orians, G. H., & Purves, W. K. (2009). Animal reproduction. In Life: The science of biology (pp. 901–903, 910). New York, NY: W H Freeman & Co.
Silverthorn, D. U. (2007). Reproduction and development. In Human physiology: An integrated approach (pp. 822–849). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
Spencer, D. (1990). Man-made language. Kitchener, Ontario: Pandora Press.
Stanfield, C. L., Germann, W. J., Niles, M. J. & Cannon, J. G. (2008). The reproductive system. In Principles of human physiology (pp. 630–655). San Francisco, CA: Pearson/Benjamin Cummings.
Sutherland, K. (2009). Girl power/Grand Prix: Sex, speed, and the motorcycle racer. Canadian Literature, 202 (Autumn), 66–78.
The Biology and Gender Study Group. (1988). The importance of feminist critique for contemporary cell biology. Hypatia, 3(1), 61–75.
Wassarman, P. M. (1999). Mammalian fertilization: Molecular aspects of gamete adhesion, exocytosis, and fusion. Cell, 96, 175–183.
Wynne-Edwards, K. E. (2001). Hormonal changes in mammalian fathers. Hormones and Behavior, 40(2), 139–145.
Zittleman, K., & Sadker, D. (2002). Gender bias is teacher education texts: New (and old) lessons. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 168–180.
The following 2010 Oncofertility Consortium summer research interns and teacher fellows participated in the discussions leading up to this study, as well as with textbook selection and an extensive initial textbook analysis: Benjamin Derman, Rosemary Hines, Alicia Howe, Matt Knoepke, Mark Prosise, Ericka Senegar-Mitchell, Ph.D., Kiran Sreenivas, and Becky Swiontek. Additionally, Sarah Rodriguez, Ph.D., provided much thoughtful insight and critique throughout multiple iterations of this study, and Francesca Duncan, Ph.D., and Robin Skory helped write and edit the “human fertilization” section. A final thank you to Teresa Woodruff, Ph.D, founder and director of the Oncofertility Consortium, for her thoughtful insight in bringing together and leading a multi-disciplinary team, for her encouragement and critique throughout this project, and for championing the cause of gender neutral language in science. Grant Funding research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers: 5UL1DE019587 and RL1 HD058296. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Lead Editor: S. Martin.
About this article
Cite this article
Campo-Engelstein, L., Johnson, N.L. Revisiting “The fertilization fairytale:” an analysis of gendered language used to describe fertilization in science textbooks from middle school to medical school. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 9, 201–220 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9494-7
- Reproductive biology
- Gendered language
- Science education
- Medical education
- Gender roles