Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 531–537 | Cite as

No space for girliness in physics: understanding and overcoming the masculinity of physics

  • Helene GötschelEmail author


Allison Gonsalves’ article on “women doctoral students’ positioning around discourses of gender and competence in physics” explores narratives of Canadian women physicists concerning their strategies to gain recognition as physicists. In my response to her rewarding and inspiring analysis I will reflect on her findings and arguments and put them into a broader context of research in gender and physics. In addition to her promising strategies to make physics attractive and welcoming to all genders I want to stress two more aspects of the tricky problem: diversity and contextuality of physics.


Physics Girliness Masculinity Gendered knowledge 


  1. Bishop, A. J. (1995). Western mathematics: The secret weapon of cultural imperialism. In B. Ashcroft, G. Griffin, & H. Tiffin (Eds.), The post-colonial studies reader (pp. 80–83). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Byers, N. (2006). Out of the shadows. Contributions of twentieth-century women to physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Erlemann, M. (2012). Hunting for female galaxies and giving birth to satellites: The gendering of epistemic cultures in public discourse on physics and astronomy. In H. Götschel (Ed.), Transforming substance—Gender in material sciences. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  4. Gonsalves, A. (2010). Discourses and gender in doctoral physics: A hard look inside a hard science. (doctoral dissertation). Montreal: McGill University Library. Retrieved January 20, 2012, from
  5. Götschel, H. (2006). Die Welt der Elementarteilchen—Genderforschung in der Physik. In S. Ebeling & S. Schmitz (Eds.), Geschlechterforschung und Naturwissenschaften (pp. 161–187). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Götschel, H. (2011). The entanglement of gender and physics: Human actors, work place cultures, and knowledge production. Science Studies, 24, 66–80.Google Scholar
  7. Götschel, H. (2012). Visible imagery and invisible gender in static electricity. In H. Götschel (Ed.), Transforming substance—Gender in material sciences. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  8. Heinsohn, D. (2000). Thermodynamik und Geschlechterdynamik um 1900. Feministische Studien, 18(1), 52–68.Google Scholar
  9. Holland, J. (2006). Die Zeit der Indifferenz. Johann Wilhelm Ritter und die Weiblichkeit. In I. Nieberle & E. Strowick (Eds.), Narration und Geschlecht. Texte—Medien—Episteme (pp. 335–347). Köln: Böhme.Google Scholar
  10. Keller, E. F. (1977). The anomaly of a woman in physics. In S. Ruddick & P. Daniels (Eds.), Working it out (pp. 77–91). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  11. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Mellström, U. (2003). Masculinity, power and technology: A Malaysian ethnography. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  13. Molvaer, J., & Stein, K. (1994). Ingenieurin—warum nicht?Berufsbild und Berufsmotivation von zukünftigen Ingenieurinnen und Ingenieuren. Ein interkultureller Vergleich.. Campus: Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
  14. Potter, E. (2001). Gender and Boyle’s law of gases. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Scheich, E. (1985). Was hält die Welt in Schwung? Feministische Ergänzungen zur Geschichte der Impetustheorie. Feministische Studien, 13(1), 10–32.Google Scholar
  16. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes. The world of high energy physics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Traweek, S. (1992). Border crossing. Narrative strategies in science studies and among physicists in Tsukuba science city, Japan. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 429–465). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human SciencesTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations