I narrate a process of transformation, a professional and personal journey framed by an experience that captured my attention shaping my interpretation and reflections. From a critical complexity framework I discuss the emergence of a learning community from the cooperation among individuals of diverse social and cultural worlds sharing the need to change a traditional professional development program structure and develop a new science education Masters Degree/Certification program. I zoom into the continual redefinition of the community, its evolution and complex interrelations among its participants and the emergence of a learning community as a boundary space having an emancipatory role and allowing growth and learning. I analyze the dialectical relationship between agents’ behavior either impeding growth or having an emancipatory function of a mindful RelationalAct in a complex adaptive system framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alexakos, K. (2010). Religion, nature, science education and the epistemology of dialectics. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 237–242.
Alexakos, K., Jones, J. K., & Rodriguez, V. H. (2011). Fictive kinship as it mediates learning, resiliency, perseverance, and social learning of inner-city high school students of color in a college physics class. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 847–870.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Kimmel, S. C. (2010). Tempered radicals: Elementary teachers’ narratives of teaching science within and against prevailing meanings of schooling. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 941–965.
Castells, M. (2001). The rise of network society (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Deng, M. C., & Raia, F. (2011). The relational act: A model to improve the practice of medicine. In C. M. Deng, F. Raia, & M. Vaccarella (Eds.), Relational concepts in medicine (pp. 5–15). Witney Oxfordshire: The Inter-Disciplinary Press.
Fodor, J. (2007). Why pigs don’t have wings. London Review of Books, 29, 19–22.
Gadamer, H. G. (1983). Verita` e metodo (G. Vattimo, Trans.). Bompiani.
Giroux, H. A. (1985a). Critical pedagogy and the resisting intellectual. Phenomenology and Pedagogy, 3, 84–97.
Giroux, H. A. (1985b). Intellectual labor and pedagogical work: Rethinking the role of the teacher as intellectual. Phenomenology and Pedagogy, 3, 20–32.
Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom—James Brown versus Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445–471.
Labaree, D. F. (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 141–165.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lemke, J. L. (2000). Material sign processes and ecosocial organization. In P. B. Andersen, C. Emmeche, & N. O. Finnemann-Nielsen (Eds.), Downward causation (pp. 181–213). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Lerner, L. S. (2000). Good and bad science in US schools—one-third of US states have unsatisfactory standards for teaching evolution. Nature, 407, 287–290.
Long, D. E. (2012). The politics of teaching evolution, science education standards, and being a creationist. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 122–139.
Massarenti, A. (2011). 1911–2011: 1’Italia della scienza negata. Il Sole 24 Ore.
Matzke, N. J. (2004). Design on trial in dover, pennsylvania. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 24, 4–9. Retrieved last December 14, 2011 from http://ncse.com/.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Page, S. E. (2011). Diversity and complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Raia, F. (2005). Students’ understanding of complex dynamic aystems. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 297–308.
Raia, F. (2008). Causality in complex dynamic systems: A challenge in earth systems science education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56, 82–94.
Raia, F. (2012). Mechanisms, causality, and explanations in complex geodynamic systems. In K. A. Kastens & C. A. Manduca (Eds.), Earth and mind II: A synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences: Geological society of America special paper (Vol. 486). Geological Society of America Special Paper.
Raia, F., & Deng, M. C. (2011). Playful and mindful interactions in the recursive adaptations of the zone of proximal development: A critical complexity science approach. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 903–914.
Raia, F., & Patel, N. (2011). Questions and explanations—students’ understanding of complex system. In H. Sayama, A. Minai, D. Braha & Y. Bar-Yam (Eds.), In unifying themes in complex systems: Proceedings of eight international conference on complex systems (Vol. VIII, pp. 481–483). Cambrige, MA: NECSI Knowledge Press.
Raia, F., & Spera, F. J. (1997). Simulations of crustal anatexis: Implications for the growth and differentiation of continental crust. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth, 102, 22629–22648.
Robertson, M., & Swan, J. (2004). Going public: The emergence and effects of soft bureaucracy within a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization, 11, 123–148.
Rodriguez, A. J. (2006). The politics of domestication and curriculum as pasture in the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 804–811.
Roth, W.-M., & Calabrese Barton, F. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186–232.
Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2001). Learning to teach science as practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 741–762.
Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2002). At the elbow of another. New York: Peter Lang.
Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2004). Cogenerative dialoguing and cataloguing: Reflexivity of processes and genres (35 paragraphs). Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5, Art. 7. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs040370.
Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2010). Solidarity and conflict: Prosody as a transactional resource in intra- and intercultural communication involving power differences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 807–847.
Schiller, G. (2011). No dinosaurs in heaven. Jezebel Prod.
Scott, C. E. (2000). The creation/evolution continuum. Retrieved last December 14, 2011 from http://ncse.com/.
Scott, E. C., & Matzke, N. J. (2007). Biological design in science classrooms. Proceedings National Academy of Science, 104, 8669–8676.
Slevin, P. (2005). Battle on teaching evolution sharpens. Washington Post.
Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 35, 601–617.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects—amateurs and professionals in Berkeleys-museum-of-vertebrate-zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
Taylor, C. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. The Review of Metaphysics, 25, 3–51.
Varela, F. (1992). Un Know-how Per l’Etica. Bari: Editrice La Terza.
Vico, G. (1709). De nostri temporis studiorum ratione. Lessico Intellettuale Europeo, 82.; Lessico filosofico dei secoli XVII e XVIII (Vol. 82). Firenze: Olschki.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wiles, J. (2005). Is evolution arkansas’s hidden curriculum? Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 25, 32–36.
Lead Editor: P.-L. Hsu.
About this article
Cite this article
Raia, F. Emergence of a learning community: a transforming experience at the boundaries. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 8, 1–24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9434-y
- Learning community
- Emergent spaces
- Relational act
- Boundary object