Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating measurement tools in science education research

  • Forum
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I explore how Margaret Beier, Lesley Miller, and Shu Wang make claims for the validity and reliability of the instrument they developed to explore the construct of “possible selves” as described in their manuscript, Science Games and the Development of Scientific Possible Selves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., Taylor, P. C., & Chen, C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 37–55. doi:10.1080/095006900289994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J. W., McDermott, P. A., Manz, P. H., & Hampton, V. R. (1996). The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance: Does it work with low-income urban children? Child Development, 67, 1071–1084. doi:10.2307/1131880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, E. O. (2011). Measurement of advanced theory of mind in school-age children: Investigating the validity of a unified construct. Unpublished doctoral thesis, New York University, New York, NY.

  • Huang, T.-C. I., Fraser, B. J., & Aldridge, J. M. (1998). Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches in studying classroom climate in Taiwan and Australia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.

  • Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

  • McKenzie, D. L., & Padilla, M. J. (1986). The construction and validation of the test of graphing in science (TOGS). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 571–579. doi:10.1002/tea.3660230702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nix, R. K., Fraser, B. J., & Ledbetter, C. E. (2005). Evaluating an integrated science learning environment using the constructivist learning environment survey. Learning Environments Research, 8, 109–133. doi:10.1007/s10984-005-7251-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plass, J. L., Milne, C., Homer, B. D., Schwartz, R. N., Hayward, E. O., Jordan, T., et al. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of computer simulations for chemistry learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 394–419. doi:10.1002/tea.21008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (2000). Methods for detecting and evaluating cultural bias in neuropsychological tests. In E. Fletcher-Janzen, T. L. Strickland, C. R. Reynolds, E. Fletcher-Janzen, T. L. Strickland, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural neuropsychology (pp. 249–285). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1991). Development of an instrument for assessing con- structivist learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293–302. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth O. Hayward.

Additional information

Lead Editor: C. Milne

Forum response to Beier, Miller, and Wang (2012). Science games and the development of scientific possible selves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayward, E.O. Evaluating measurement tools in science education research. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 7, 979–983 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9427-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9427-x

Keywords

Navigation