Abstract
Neoliberalism has spread globally and operates hegemonically in many fields, including science education. I use historical auto/ethnography to examine global referents that have mediated the production of contemporary science education to explore how the roles of teachers and learners are related to macrostructures such as neoliberalism and derivative sensibilities, including standards, competition, and accountability systems, that mediate enacted curricula. I investigate these referents in relation to science education in two geographically and temporally discrete contexts Western Australia in the 1960s and 1970s and more recently in an inner city high school in the US. In so doing I problematize some of the taken for granted aspects of science education, including holding teachers responsible for establishing and maintaining control over students, emphasizing competition between individuals and between collectives such as schools, school districts and countries, and holding teachers and school leaders accountable for student achievement.
Access this article
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
SLCs can be regarded as schools within a school. The coordinator of a SLC is like the principal of a small school.
References
Axford, B., & Seddon, T. (2006). Lifelong learning in a market economy: Education, training and the citizen-consumer. Australian Journal of Education, 50(2), 167–184.
Carambo, C. (2005). Learning science and the centrality of student participation. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students, and researchers (pp. 165–180). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Ceci, S. J., & Papierno, P. B. (2005). The rhetoric and reality of gap closing: When the “have-nots” gain but the “haves” gain even more. American Psychologist, 60(2), 149–160.
Clawson, D. (2009). Tenure and the future of the university. Science, 324, 1147–1148.
de Laeter, J. R. (1989). The influence of American and British thought on Australian physics education. Science Education, 73, 445–457.
Delores, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gough, N. (1999). Globalization and school curriculum change: Locating a transnational imaginary. Journal of Education Policy, 14, 73–84.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hewson, P., Scantlebury, K., Kahle, J. B., & Davies, D. (2001). Equitable science education in urban middle schools: Do reform efforts make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10, 1130–1144.
Jenkins, E. (2007). School science: A questionable construct? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39, 265–282.
Lytle, J. H. (1998). Using chaos and complexity theory to inform high school redirection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
Modelski, G. (1968). Communism and globalization of politics. International Studies Quarterly, 12, 380–393.
National Center on Education and the Economy. (2006). Tough choices or tough times: Executive summary—The report of the New Commission on the skills of the American workforce. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
National Research Council, Center for Mathematics, Science and Engineering Education. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Oliff, J. L. (2000). University City High school: An experiment in innovative education—1959–1972. Unpublished senior honors thesis in American History. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America. (2002). No child left behind act of 2001. Washington, DC: Congressional Act, Public Law No. 107–110.
Organisation for Economic, Cooperative Development (OECD). (1996). Lifelong learning for all. Paris: OECD.
Palmer, W. (2009). Raising awareness about gentrification and community displacement: The West City community. Accessed on June 4, 2009 at http://www.blackbottom.org/blackbottom/.
Pavel, S. S. (1975). A case study of the individualized study program at University City high school during the school year 1972–73. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (AAT 7611195). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Puiggrós, A. (1997). World Bank education policy: Market liberalism meets ideological conservatism. International Journal of Health Services, 27, 217–226.
Ravitch, D. (2007). Challenges to teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 269–273.
Roth, W.-M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: Routledge.
Salley, C. (1974). The individualized study program at University City high school: A case study in the dynamics of innovative ineffectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (AAT 7503701). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Tobin, K. (2008). Cultural relevance and alignment in science education. In A. Rodriguez (Ed.), The multiple faces of agency: Innovative strategies for effecting change in urban school contexts (pp. 29–40). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishing.
Tobin, K. (2009). Research priorities for transforming urban science education. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), World of science education: North America (pp. 439–459). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishing.
Tobin, K., Elmesky, R., & Seiler, G. (Eds.). (2005). Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students, and researchers. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Tomlinson, J. (1996). Cultural globalisation: Placing and displacing the West. European Journal of Development Research, 8(2), 22–35.
Turner, J. H. (2002). Face to face: Toward a sociological theory of interpersonal behavior. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
White, R. C. (1998). Heroes from the past: Their beliefs and practices, and influence on current science education practice. Doctoral dissertation, Curtin University of Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tobin, K. Global reproduction and transformation of science education. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 6, 127–142 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-010-9293-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-010-9293-3