Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 361–380 | Cite as

What does playing cards have to do with science? A resource-rich view of African American young men

Article

Abstract

The study examines the resources related to science that African American young men learn and develop by playing a card game called Spades, a common cultural practice in African American communities that dates back to the Civil War Era. The qualitative study examines what the Spades players at a local high school consider when making decisions about what cards to play. A significant finding is that the players use, learn and develop resources such as the ability to make observations, draw inferences, and use empirical data to inform future actions and decisions. Such reasoning bears a resemblance to central practices of science and challenges long held deficit views of African American young men. Implications of the research findings are discussed.

Keywords

Science education African American young men Card playing Cultural practice Spades 

References

  1. Andrews, J. (2000). Spades: History and evolution. Retrieved August 25, 2006, from http://www.msoworld.com/mindzine/news/card/andrews2s.html.
  2. Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Education Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boykin, A. W. (1994). Afrocultural expression and its implications for schooling. In E. R. Hollins, J. E. King, & W. C. Hayman (Eds.), Teaching diverse populations: Formulating a knowledge base (pp. 243–256). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carlson, D. (1997). Making progress: Education and culture in new times. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Earle, J., & Wan, J. C. (2009). The National Science Foundation and systemic reform. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://teachers.yale.edu/oncommonground/index.php?skin=h&page=04/05.
  6. Elmesky, R. (2005). “I am science and the world is mine”: Embodied practices as resources for empowerment. School Science and Mathematics, 105(7), 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elmesky, R., & Tobin, K. (2005). Expanding our understandings of urban science education by expanding the roles of students as researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 807–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferguson, R. (2003). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. Urban Education, 38(4), 460–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geire, R., Blumenfield, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., et al. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science: Curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gutierrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of knowing: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoekstra, J. A. (1893). American whist. Rochester: The Post-Express Printing Company.Google Scholar
  12. Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2003). The use of argumentation in Haitian Creole classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1), 73–93.Google Scholar
  13. Jaynes, G. D. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of African American society, Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, C. C., Kahle, J. B., & Fargo, J. D. (2007). Effective teaching results in increased science achievement for all students. Science Education, 91(3), 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Pertrosino, A. J. (2001). Reconsidering the role of experiment in science education. In K. Crowley, C. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 251–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, M. (2002). Language, discourse and power in African American culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morrison, G., & Lamb, Y. R. (2005). Rise and fly: tall tales and mostly true rules of bid whist. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  18. Nasir, N. (2000). “Points ain’t everything”: Emergent goals and average and percent understandings in the play of basketball among African American students. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 31(3), 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nasir, N. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2&3), 213–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nasir, N. (2005). Individual cognitive structuring and the sociocultural context: Strategy shifts in the game of dominoes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2001). Educational achievement and Black- White inequality. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_3/3_3/q6-1.asp.
  22. Noguera, P. (2003). The trouble with black boys: the roles and influence of environmental and cultural factors on the academic performance of African American males. In O. S. Fashola (Ed.), Educating African American males: voices from the field (pp. 51–78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Schademan, A. R., Ares, N., & Gonzalez, N. (2010). Negotiating hybridity in youth cultural practice. In N. Ares (Ed.), Youthful productions: Cultural practices and constructions of content and social spaces (pp. 47–64). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  25. Seiler, G. (2001). Reversing the “standard” direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 1000–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Seiler, G., Tobin, K., & Sokolic, J. (2001). Design, technology, and science: sites for learning, resistance, and social reproduction in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 746–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sewell, W. H. J. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Swanson, D. P., Cunningham, M., & Spencer, M. B. (2003). Black males’ structural conditions, achievement patterns, normative needs, and “opportunities”. Urban Education, 38(5), 608–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Roseberry, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense- making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Young, A. A. J. (2004). The minds of marginalized Black men: Making sense of mobility, opportunity, and future life chances. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationCalifornia State UniversityChicoUSA

Personalised recommendations