Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hidden wor(l)ds in science class: conscientization and politicization in science education research and practice

  • Forum
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conscientization involves a recursive process of reflection and action toward individual and social transformation. Often this process takes shape through encounters in/with diverse and often conflicting discourses. The study of student and teacher discourses, or scripts and counterscripts, in science classrooms can reveal asymmetrical power relations and the ways in which dominant scripts of marginalization are often enacted. Decoding the dominant structures in these discourses is a complex and political act that might offer some possibilities for transformative practice. But for this to take place teachers, students, and researchers need to collaborate to conduct classroom research that embraces the political dimension of conscientization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruna, K. R. (2007). Mexican immigrant transnational social capital and class transformation: Examining the role of peer mediation in insurgent science. Paper presented at the Springer Forum on Cultural Studies of Science Education, April 7, 2007, Chicago, IL.

  • Bruna, K. R. (2009). Jesus and Maria in the jungle: An essay on possibility and constraint in the third-shift third space. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 221–237. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9159-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese Barton, A. (1998). Reframing “science for all” through the politics of poverty. Educational Policy, 12, 525–541. doi:10.1177/0895904898012005004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darder, A. (2002). Re-inventing Paulo Freire: A pedagogy of love. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2001). Education for critical consciousness: Education and conscientização. In A.-M. Friere & D. Macedo (Eds.), The Paulo Freire reader (pp. 80–110). New York, NY: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1997). Cognition, context and learning. In D. Kirschner & J. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, S. M. (2003). Profoundly multicultural questions. Educational Leadership, 60, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler, G. (2005). All my life I been po’: Orality as a resource for science teaching and learning. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers (pp. 113–130). Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29. doi:10.1086/229967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I. (1993). Education is politics: Paulo Freire’s critical pedagogy. In P. McLaren & P. Leonard (Eds.), Paulo Freire: A critical encounter (pp. 25–35). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. New York, NY: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Yerrick, R., & Roth, W.-M. (2005). Expanding agency and changing social structures. In R. Yerrick & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research (pp. 287–292). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Gale Seiler & Anjali Abraham

Authors
  1. Gale Seiler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anjali Abraham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gale Seiler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seiler, G., Abraham, A. Hidden wor(l)ds in science class: conscientization and politicization in science education research and practice. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 4, 739–753 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9192-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9192-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation