Abstract
Approaches to research in the social sciences often embrace schema that are consistent with positivism, even though it is widely held that positivism is discredited and essentially dead. Accordingly, many of the methods used in present day scholarship are supported by the tenets of positivism, and are sources of hegemony. We exhort researchers to employ reflexive methods to identify the epistemologies, ontologies and axiologies that are salient in their scholarship and, when necessary, transform practices such that forms of oppression associated with crypto-positivism are identified and extinguished.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, T. (1973). Negative dialectics. New York: The Seabury Press.
Agrawal, A. (1995). Indigenous and scientific knowledge: Some critical comments. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor, 3(3), 3–6.
Allen, M. (2000). Voice of reason. Retrieved December 05, 2007, from http://www.curtin.edu.au/learn/unit/10846/arrow/vorall.htm.
Apffel-Marglin, F. (1995). Development or decolonialization in the Andes? Interculture: International Journal of Intercultural and Transdisciplinary Research, 28(1), 3–17.
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (2004). Philosophy and politics. Social Research, 71, 427–454.
Bergson, H. (1910). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness (Trans. F. L. Pogson). London: George Allen and Unwin.
Bronowski, J. (1974). Humanism and the growth of knowledge. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (Book 1) (pp. 606–629). La Salle, IL: The Open Court Publishing Co.
Clark, C. (2001). Surely teaching hypertext in the composition classroom qualifies as a feminist pedagogy? Retrieved December 05, 2007, from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/6.2/coverweb/gender/clark/index.htm.
Cooper, J. M. (Ed.). (1997). Plato: Complete works. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.
Davies, P. (2007). Taking science on faith. New York Times (Op-Ed, November 24).
Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the baroque (Trans. T. Conley). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. Trans. P. Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.
Elmesky, R., & Tobin, K. (2005). Expanding our understandings of urban science education by expanding the roles of students as researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 807–828.
Faulconer, J., & Williams, R. (1985). Temporality in human action: An alternative to positivism and historicism. The American Psychologist, 40, 1179–1188.
Giroux, H. (1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Gran, G. (1986). Beyond African famines: Whose knowledge matters? Alternatives, 11, 275–296.
Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.
Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Harding, S. (Ed.). (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. New York: Routledge.
Herrnstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in America. New York: The Free Press.
Hess, D. (1995). Science and technology in a multicultural world: The cultural politics of facts and artifacts. New York: Columbia University Press.
Horkheimer, M. (1974). Critique of instrumental reason. New York: Seabury Press.
Huntington, S. (2004). Who are we? The challenge to America’s national identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Knowledge and critical pedagogy: An introduction. Dordrecht: Springer.
Laudan, L. (1996). Beyond positivism and relativism: Theory, method and evidence. Boulder: Westview Press.
Nelson, L. (2000). Feminist epistemology as and in practice. Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, 99 (2). Retrieved December 05, 2007, from http://ww.apa.udel.edu/apa/publications/newsletter//v99n2.
Phillips, D. C. (1983). After the wake: Postpositivistic educational thought. Educational Researcher, 12(5), 4–12.
Phillips, D. C. (2005). The contested nature of empirical educational research (and why philosophy of education offers little help). Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39, 577–597.
Belmont Report. (1979). Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Retrieved December 6, 2007, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html.
Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
Schutz, A. (1964). Collected papers II: Studies in social theory (A. Brodersen, editor). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people. New York: St. Martin’s Press, LLC.
Steinberg, S., & Kincheloe, J. (Eds.). (2006). What you don’t know about schools. New York: Palgrave.
Thayer-Bacon, B. (2003). Relational “(e)pistemologies.” New York: Peter Lang.
Tobin, K., & Kincheloe, J. (Eds.). (2006). Doing educational research: A handbook. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Viergever, M. (1999). Indigenous knowledge: An interpretation of views from indigenous peoples. In L. Semali & J. Kincheloe (Eds.), What is indigenous knowledge? Voices from the academy (pp. 333–359). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.
Weiler, H. (2004). Challenging the orthodoxies of knowledge: Epistemological, structural, and political implications for higher education. Retrieved December 05, 2007, from http://www.stanford.edu/~weiler/unesco_paper_124.pdf.
Whitehead, A. (1929/1978). Process and reality. New York: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kincheloe, J.L., Tobin, K. The much exaggerated death of positivism. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 4, 513–528 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9178-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9178-5