Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 239–254 | Cite as

Urban science classrooms and new possibilities: on intersubjectivity and grammar in the third space



In this article I explore research in urban science education inspired by the work of Kris Gutierrez in a paper based on her 2005 Scribner Award. It addresses key points in Gutierrez’s work by exploring theoretical frameworks for research and approaches to teaching and research that expand the discourse on the agency of urban youth in corporate school settings. The work serves as an overview of under-discussed approaches and theoretical frameworks to consider in teaching and conducting research with marginalized urban youth in urban science classrooms.


Urban science education Third space Neo indigenous Cogenerative dialogues Cosmopolitanism 


  1. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism; ethics in a world of strangers. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1983). Forms of capital. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  6. Emdin, C. (2007). Exploring the contexts of urban science classrooms. Part 2: The emergence of rituals in the learning of science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 351–392. doi:10.1007/s11422-007-9057-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Emdin, C. (2008). The three C’s for urban science education. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(10), 772–775.Google Scholar
  8. Gutierrez, K. D. (2005). Intersubjectivity and grammar in the third space. AERA Scribner Award Lecture.Google Scholar
  9. Gutierrez, K., Larson, J., & Kreuter, B. (1995). Cultural tensions in the scripted classroom: The value of the subjugated perspective. Urban Education, 29, 410–442. doi:10.1177/0042085995029004004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moje, E., Ciechanowsky, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working towards third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–71. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  12. Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Tobin, K. (2000). Becoming and urban science educator. Research in Science Education, 30, 89–106. doi:10.1007/BF02461655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. West, C. (1999). The Cornell West reader. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar


  1. Gaye, M., & Nyx, J. (1971). Inner city blues (Makes me wanna holler) [Marvin Gaye] On *What’s going on* [Record]. Detroit: Motown Records.Google Scholar
  2. Jones, N. (1994). If I ruled the world [Nas]. On *It was written* [CD]. New York: Columbia Records.Google Scholar
  3. Mackie, S. (2007). Flashbacks [Papoose]. On *Menace to society 2* [CD]. New York: Street Sweepers Entertainment.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations