Abstract
Many attempt to address the documented achievement gap between urban and suburban students by offering special programs to enrich urban students’ academic experiences and proficiencies. Such was the case in the study described by DeGennaro and Brown in which urban students participated in an after-school technology course intended to address the “digital divide” by giving these youth supported experiences as technology users. However, also like the initial situation described in this study, instructional design that does not capitalize on what we know about urban education or informal learning contexts can actually further damage urban youths’ identities as learners by positioning them as powerless and passive recipients instead of meaningful contributors to their own learning. The analysis presented in this forum is intended to further the conversation begun by DeGennaro and Brown by explicitly complexifying our consideration of context (activity structures and setting) so as to support the development of contexts that afford rich learning potential for both the urban students and their learning facilitators, positioned in the role of teachers. Carefully constructed contexts can afford participants as learners (urban students and teachers) opportunities to access rich identity resources (not typically available in traditional school contexts) including, but not limited to, the opportunity to exercise agency that allows participants to reorganize their learning context and enacted culture as needed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It is likely true that a third group, namely the directors of the after-school initiative, may constitute an equally important third group of “learners” as they appear to have released control over time allowing both of the other learner groups new acceptable forms of participation in their learning thus evidencing their own learning and identity development with respect to what it means to “direct” such an initiative; however, the data for this group were not made available in the published manuscript.
References
Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Barton, A. C. (2002). Urban science education studies: A commitment to equity, social justice and a sense of place. Studies in Science Education, 38, 1–38. doi:10.1080/03057260208560186.
Barton, A. C., & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning from Miguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 871–889. doi :10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<871::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-9.
Bell, R., Blair, M., Crawford, B., & Lederman, N. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487–509. doi:10.1002/tea.10086.
Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 878–898. doi:10.1002/tea.1037.
Dilley, R. (Ed.). (1999). The problem of context. New York: Berghahn Books.
Dow, G. (1979). Learning to teach: Teaching to learn. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Erickson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Giroux, H., & McLaren, P. (1986). Teacher education and the politics of engagement: The case for democratic schooling. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 213–238.
Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 290–294.
Kerby, A. P. (1991). Narrative and the self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
LaVan, S. (2005). Beyond either-or: Reconsidering resources in terms of structures. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers (pp. 245–260). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Lee, O. (2005). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10, 431–440. doi:10.1207/s15327671espr1004_5.
Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822–839. doi:10.1002/sce.20209.
Luehmann, A. L., & Markowitz, D. (2007). Science teachers’ perceived benefits of an out-of-school enrichment programme: Identity needs and university affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1133–1161. doi:10.1080/09500690600944429.
Murphey, T., & Arao, H. (2001). Reported belief changes through near peer role modeling. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 5(3), 1–15.
Nasir, N., & Hand, V. (2004). From the court to the classroom: Managing identities as learners in basketball and classroom mathematics. San Diego, CA: Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association.
National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington DC: The National Academy of Sciences.
Olitsky, S. (2006). Structure, agency, and the development of students’ identities as learners. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 745–766. doi:10.1007/s11422-006-9033-x.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16, 13–20.
Roth, W. M. (2005). Organizational mediation of urban science. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers (pp. 65–88). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Seiler, G. (2005). All my life I been po’: Oral fluency as a resource for science teaching and learning. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers (pp. 113–130). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Settlage, J., & Meadows, L. (2002). Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America’s urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 114–127. doi:10.1002/tea.10012.
Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytical tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22. doi:10.3102/0013189X034004014.
Spillane, J., Diamond, J., Walker, L., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 918–940. doi:10.1002/tea.1039.
Tobin, K. (2005). Urban science as a culturally and socially adaptive practice. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers (pp. 21–42). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Tobin, K. (2006). Aligning the cultures of teaching and learning science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 219–252. doi:10.1007/s11422-005-9008-3.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weiner, L. (1993). Preparing teachers for urban schools: Lessons from thirty years of school reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luehmann, A.L. Accessing resources for identity development by urban students and teachers: foregrounding context. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 4, 51–66 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9139-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9139-4