Abstract
In this paper I respond to Ajay Sharma’s Portrait of a Science Teacher as a Bricoleur: A case study from India, by speaking to two aspects of the bricoleur: the subject and the discursive in relation to pedagogic perspective. I highlight that our subjectivities are negotiated based on the desires of the similar and competing discourses we are exposed to, and the political powers they hold in society. As (science) teachers we modify our practices based upon our own internal arbitrations with discourses. I agree with Sharma that as teachers we are discursively produced, however, I suggest that what is missing in the discussion of his paper is the historically socially constructed nature of science or science education itself. I advocate that science education is not neutral, objective or unproblematic. Building on Gill and Levidow’s (Anti-racist science teaching, 1987) critique, it is precisely because we are socially constructed by the dominant hegemonic science education discourse that we rarely articulate the underlying political or economic priorities of science; science’s appropriation of other cultural ways of knowing; the way science theory has been, or is used to justify the oppression of peoples for political gain; the central role science and technology play in the defensive, economic and political agendas of nations and multinational corporations who fund science; the historical, and contemporary role science plays in rationalizing an exploitative ideological perspective towards the more-than-human world and the natural environment; and finally, the alienating effect science has on students when used as a ranking and sorting mechanism by educational systems. Therefore, we need to do what Mr. Raghuvanshi could not imagine: we need to destabilize the foundations of science education by questioning inherent structural and ideological inequities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
to avoid cumbersome constructions female pronouns are used in all situations in which either/or is implied.
References
Abd-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–436.
Ansley, F. L. (1989). Stirring the ashes: Race, class and the future of civil rights scholarship. Cornell Law Review, 74, 993–1077.
Bianchini, J. A., Johnston, C. C., Oram, S. Y., & Cavazos, L. M. (2003). Learning to teach science in contemporary and equitable ways: The successes and struggles of first-year science teachers. Science Education, 87, 419–443.
Bove, P. (1990). Discourse. In F. Lentricchia & T. McKaughlin (Eds.), Critial terms for literary study (pp. 50–65). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bowers, C. A. (2004). Comment on David Gruenewald’s A Foucauldian analysis of environmental education. Curriculum Inquiry, 34, 223–232.
Calabrese Barton, A. (2001). Capitalism, Critical Pedagogy, and Urban Science Education: An Interview with Peter McLaren. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 847–859.
Davies, B. (1990). The problem of desire. Social Problems, 37, 501–516.
Davies, B. (2000a). Eclipsing the constitutive power of discourse: The writing of Janette Turner Hospital. In E. St. Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 179–198). New York: Routledge.
Davies, B. (2000b). A body of writing 1990–1999. Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Duschl, R. A. (2000). Making the nature of science explicit. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Fox Keller, E. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Frankenberg, R. (1993). The social construction of Whiteness: White women, race matters. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Gale, T., & Densmore, K. (2000). Just schooling: Explorations in the cultural politics of teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Gill, G., & Levidow, L. (1987). Anti-racist science teaching. London: Free Association Books.
Giroux, H. A., Lankshear, C., McLaren, P., & Peters, M. (1996). Counternarratives: Cultural studies and critical pedagogies in postmodern spaces. New York: Routledge.
Hodson, D. (2001). What counts as good science education. OISE Papers in STSE Education, 2, 7–22.
Howard, G. R. (1999). We can’t teach what we don’t know: White teachers, multicultural schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-Khalick, K., Bell, R. L., Schwartz, R. S., & Akerson, V. (2001). Assessing the un-assessible: Views of nature of science questionnaire. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St Louis, MO.
Levine-Rasky, C. (2000). The practice of Whiteness among teacher candidates. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 10(3), 263–284.
Martusewicz, R. A. (2001). Seeking passage; post-structuralism, pedagogy, ethics. New York: Teachers College Press.
McIntosh, P. (1988). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondences through Work in Women’s Studies. At. http://seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/~mcisaac/emc598ge/Unpacking.html. Accessed 25/10/07.
McLaren, P. (1997). Revolutionary multiculturalism: Pedagogies of dissent for the new millennium. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Niño El-Hani, C., & Fleury Mortimer, E. (2007). Multicultural education, pragmatism, and the goals of science teaching. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(3), 657–702.
O’Sullivan, E. (1999). Transformative learning: educational vision for the 21st century. Toronto: OISE Press.
Probyn, E. (2003). The spatial imperative of subjectivity. In K. Anderson, M. Domosh, S. Pile, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Handbook of cultural geography (pp. 290–299). London: Sage.
Sammel, A. (2004). Teachers’ understandings and enactments of social and environmental justice issues in the classroom: What’s “critical” in the manufacturing of road smart squirrels? Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Sammel, A. (2006). Finding the crack in everything: Exploring the causal promise in science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(4), 325–337.
Sammel, A. (in press). A Circle is more than a Straight Line Curved: Conversations about First Nations science education. In C. Shick, L. Comeau, & J. McNinch (Eds.), The race and culture divide. Regina, Canada: Canadian Plains Research Center.
Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). “It is the nature of the beast”: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 205–236.
St. Pierre, E. A. (2000). Poststructural feminsm in education: An overview. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 477–515.
St. Pierre, E., & Pillow, W. S. (2000). Working the ruins: feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York: Routledge.
Stovall, D. (2006). Forging community in race and class: critical race theory and the quest for social justice in education. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 9, 243–259.
Taylor, P. (2006). Forum: Alternative perspectives cultural hybridity and third space science classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(1), 189–208.
Valencia, R. R. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking. London: Falmer Press.
Webster Brandon, W. (2003). Towards a white teachers’ guide to playing fair: exploring the cultural politics of multicultural teaching. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 31–50.
Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sammel, A. Traveling with and through your backpack: a personal reflection on the infrastructure of science education. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 3, 843–857 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9118-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9118-9