Abstract
The radical philosophies of difference articulated by Deleuze and Guattari are just beginning to impinge the field of education although less so within science education. One common thread among the numerous concepts and neologisms (especially the rhizome) that have been coined is the necessity for thinking and acting in what they call ‘experimental’ modes, which shifts our focus onto the eternal process of becoming rather than merely (re)producing states of being. I reflect upon these seemingly utopian ideas in the light of recent educational changes in Singapore aimed at preparing competent citizen–workers for the knowledge economy and globalization. In particular, this paper shows how one elementary science teacher adopted guerilla tactics while negotiating these sometimes conflicting transitions in policies. I argue that neither mandated, top-down reforms nor drastic experimentation by individuals alone are most productive but rather working in the ephemeral in-between spaces of the rhizome, which Deleuze and Guattari had all long championed.
摘要
德勒兹与加达里的有关差异的激进哲学思想已在教育领域产生影响, 而其对科学教学的影响则稍显逊色。德勒兹与加达里提出了众多的概念, 也创造出许多新词语(尤其是 ‘根茎’, 利卓姆), 而贯穿其中的一个观点是, 我们要在所谓的‘试验’状态中思维与行动, 要关注永恒的生成过程, 而不是仅仅维持(复制)存在。本文探讨这些近似乌托邦式的观点对新加坡最近推行的旨在培养知识经济及全球化环境下的高素质公民-劳动者的教育改革的启发意义。将着重研究一位小学科学教师在解读有时自相矛盾的转型中的教育政策过程中所采取的游击式教学策略。作者认为, 指令性的, 自上而下的教育改革以及单枪匹马式的大幅度的教学实验皆不可取, 而德勒兹与加达里长期以来所倡导的于稍纵即逝的, 根茎的夹缝中求生才最有成效
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Although Deleuze and Guattari are especially celebrated for their collaborative works, which I rely heavily upon in this paper, when I use the terms ‘Deleuze’ or ‘Deleuzian’ I acknowledge the contribution of Guattari as well.
EM3 is the weakest of the three streaming bands in primary schools in Singapore comprising 7–8% of the cohort. Thus, EM2.9 indicated that pupils’ abilities were bordering this highly unpopular category.
Allocated time given for teachers to inject quality teaching techniques, or give learners room to exercise their own initiatives for self-learning. Schools have the freedom to choose either to spread it out over the academic year or to accumulate it into a block period at the end of term.
References
Bogue, R. (2004a). Apology for nomadology. Interventions, 6(2), 169–179.
Bogue, R. (2004b). Search, swim and see: Deleuze’s apprenticeship in signs and pedagogy of images. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 327–342.
Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (2001). The future of skill formation in Singapore. Asia Pacific Business Review, 7, 113–138.
Callinicos, A. (1989). Against postmodernism: A Marxist critique. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. London: Blackwells.
Chambers, C. (2003). “As Canadian as possible under the circumstances”: A view of contemporary curriculum discourses in Canada. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 221–252). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: The Athlone Press.
Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2002). (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam Trans.) Dialogues II. New York: Continuum.
Drummond, J. S. (2005). The rhizome and the tree: A response to Holmes and Gastaldo. Nursing Philosophy, 6, 255–266.
Edwards, R. (2006). A sticky business? Exploring the “and” in teaching and learning. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27, 121–133.
Edwards, R., & Clarke, J. (2002). Flexible learning, spatiality and identity. Studies in Continuing Education, 24, 153–165.
Engeström, Y. (2006). From well-bounded ethnographies to intervening in mycorrhizae activities. Organization Studies, 27, 1783–1793.
Flannery, M. C. (2001). Quilting: A feminist metaphor for scientific inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 628–645.
Gough, N. (2006). Shaking the tree, making a rhizome: Towards a nomadic geophilosophy of science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38, 625–645.
Hagood, M. C. (2004). A rhizomatic cartography of adolescents, popular culture, and constructions of self. In K. M. Leander & M. Sheehy (Eds.), Spatializing literacy research and practice (pp. 143–160). New York: Peter Lang.
Hogan, D. (2006). The pedagogy of science education in Singapore. Presentation given at Leading inquiry: A science education forum on 19th July 2006 in Singapore.
Kamberelis, G. (2004). The rhizome and the pack: Liminal literacy formations with political teeth. In K. M. Leander & M. Sheehy (Eds.), Spatializing literacy research and practice (pp. 161–197). New York: Peter Lang.
Koh, A. (2004). Singapore education in “New Times”: Global/local imperatives. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25, 335–349.
Krejsler, J. (2004). Becoming individual in education and cyberspace. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10, 489–503.
Leach, M., & Boler, M. (1998). Giles Deleuze: Practicing education through flight and gossip. In M. Peters (Ed.), Naming the multiple: Poststructuralism and education (pp. 149–172). Wesport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Leander, K. M., & Rowe, D. W. (2006). Mapping literacy spaces in motion: A rhizomatic analysis of a classroom literacy performance. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 428–460.
Lee, I.C.H., & Luo, G. (2006). Is the paper and pencil assessment mode appropriate for assessing the learning outcomes of primary science? Teachers’ attitudes. In X. Liu & W. Boone (Eds.), Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education (pp. 285–314). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
Liew, W. M. (2005). Teachers’ professional lives in an age of educational reform. In J. Tan & P. T. Ng (Eds.), Shaping Singapore’s future: Thinking schools, Learning Nation (pp. 137–166). Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Martin, E. (1998). Anthropology and the cultural study of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23, 24–44.
McLaren, P. (2007). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Boston: Pearson.
Measuring globalization (2005). Foreign Policy, 148(May–June), 52–60.
Michael, M. (2002). Comprehension, apprehension, prehension: Heterogeneity and the public understanding of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27, 347–378.
Ministry of Trade and Industry (2006). Sustaining innovation-driven growth: Science & technology plan 2010. Singapore: SNP Printing.
Nietzsche, F. W. (1967). The birth of tragedy, and the case of Wagner. New York: Vintage Books.
Parr, A. (Ed.). (2005). The Deleuze dictionary. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pearson, M., & Somekh, B. (2006). Learning transformation with technology: A question of sociocultural contexts?. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 519–539.
Peters, M. A. (2004). Geophilosophy, education and the pedagogy of the concept [Special issue]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(3).
Peters, M. A. (2006). Philosophy of science [Special issue]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5).
Rogan, J. M. (2007). How much curriculum change is appropriate? Defining a zone of feasible innovation. Science Education, 91, 439–460.
Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in nomadic spaces: Deleuze and curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
Semetsky, I. (2004). Experiencing Deleuze. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 227–231.
Sharpe, L., & Gopinathan, S. (2002). After effectiveness: New direction in the Singapore school system?. Journal of Education Policy, 17, 151–166.
Stivale, C. J. (1998). The two-fold thought of Deleuze and Guattari: Intersections and animations. New York: The Guilford Press.
St.Pierre, E. A. (1997). Circling the text: Nomadic writing practices. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 403–417.
Tan, C. (2005). Driven by pragmatism: Issues and challenges in an ability-driven education. In J. Tan & P. T. Ng (Eds.), Shaping Singapore’s future: Thinking schools, Learning Nation (pp. 5–21). Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Tan, J., & Ng, P. T. (2005). Shaping Singapore’s future: Thinking schools, Learning Nation. Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Tubbs, N. (2005). The philosophy of the teacher. The Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 39, 183–414.
Venthan, A. M. (2006). An insight into secondary science education in Singapore classrooms. Unpublished masters thesis, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Woronov, T. E. (2004). In the eye of the chicken: Hierarchy and marginality among Beijing’s migrant schoolchildren. Ethnography, 5, 289–313.
Yeo, J., Tan, S. C., & Lee, Y.-J. (2006). A learning journey in problem-based learning. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 27 June–1 July (pp. 859–865). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zembylas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2005). Globalization, information and communication technologies, and the prospect of a ‘global village’: Promises of inclusion or electronic colonization? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 65–83.
Acknowledgements
Aik-Ling Tan for giving great feedback and much encouragement on earlier versions of this paper and Libo Guo for translating the abstract into Chinese.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, YJ. Thriving in-between the cracks: Deleuze and guerilla science teaching in Singapore. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 3, 917–935 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9116-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9116-y