Abstract
Is it possible to explain students’ conceptions of natural phenomena purely in terms of the interactions between two people and the language they use during an interview? I argue that this hypothesis cannot be accepted on several grounds. First, contextual factors prior to the interview influence the course of its events, and that these in turn influence future events. Second, people have agency over their interactions and the ability to use language creatively in ways that a strong version of language preordination inherent in this hypothesis would not permit. Third, people bring language fluency and ideas to an interview that allow them to grapple with phenomena and issues they might not have previously considered, and formulate conceptions that they can and do use in future interactions. In addition, I argue that the field of science education is able to consider curricular and instructional issues relating to students’ conceptions without resorting to the extremes of cultural relativism or intellectual imperialism, and that conceptual change theory addresses both the processes and outcomes of students’ interactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
There are also the pragmatic grounds of the cost and/or intrusiveness of using video.
References
Department of Education (2002). Revised National Curriculum Statement for Grades R–9 (Schools). Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Education http://www.education.gov.za/Curriculum/GET/doc/natural.pdf. Accessed April 12, 2007.
Harrison, A. G., Grayson, D. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1999). Investigating a grade 11 student’s evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 55–88.
Helm, H., & Novak, J. D. (Eds.). (1983). Misconceptions in science and mathematics. Proceedings of the International Seminar. ERIC http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/Home.portal, ED 242 553. Accessed April 12, 2007.
Hewson, P. W. (2007). Teacher professional development in science: A case study of the primary science programme’s CTI course. In I. Mutimucuio & M. Cherinda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting. Maputo, Mozambique: Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education.
Hewson, P. W., Beeth, M. E., & Thorley, N. R. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change. In K. G. Tobin & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 199–218). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Hewson, P. W., & Hennessey, M. G. (1992). Making status explicit: A case study of conceptual change. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 176–187). Kiel, Germany: IPN. (Proceedings of an International Workshop held in Bremen, Germany, March 5–8, 1991).
Hewson, P. W., & Lemberger, J. (2000). Status as the hallmark of conceptual learning. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 110–125). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Lane, J. (2001). Unpublished interview. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Lemberger, J. (1995). Conceptual change and problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.
Primary Science Programme (2005). Tools for planning your natural science curriculum. Lansdowne, Western Cape: PSP.
Primary Science Programme (2006). Report: Natural sciences course for intermediate phase educators. Lansdowne, Western Cape: PSP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hewson, P.W. Conceptions over time: Are language and the here-and-now up to the task?. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 3, 263–276 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9107-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9107-z