Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 219–252 | Cite as

Aligning the Cultures of Teaching and Learning Science in Urban High Schools



This paper analyzes teaching and learning in urban science classrooms in which most of the students are African American and from low-income homes. Their teachers are also racial minorities and yet they struggle to teach successfully across cultural boundaries. The first set of case studies involves a male teacher who taught in a high-energy way that produced structures for students to get involved in the doing of science. His verbal fluency and expressive individualism, involving emphatic gestures, rhythmic use of his body, and voice intonation maintained student participation. A second case study examines successful interactions among the students, involving an argument over competing models for chemical valence. Whereas the students interacted successfully, the teacher was frequently out of synchrony in terms of amplitude, pitch, and non-verbal actions. The key implication is the necessity for teachers and students to learn how to interact successfully in ways that produce positive emotional energy, a sense of belonging to the class, and a commitment to shared responsibility for one another's participation. Aligning the cultures of teaching and learning offers a possibility that fluent interactions will occur, afford success, and facilitate the learning of science.

Key words

cultural alignment urban education equity emotions verbal interaction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, E.: 1999, Code of the street: Decency, violence and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Boersma, P. and Weenink, D.: 2005, Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.27) [Computer program]. Retrieved October 18, 2005, from
  3. Boykin, A.W.: 1986, `The triple quandary and the schooling of Afro-American Children', in U. Neisser (ed.), The school achievement of minority children: New perspectives (pp. 57–92). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, R.: 2004, Interaction ritual chains, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Elmesky, R.: 2003, `Crossfire on the streets and into the classroom: Meso/micro understandings of weak cultural boundaries, strategies of action and a sense of the game in an inner-city chemistry classroom', Cybernetics and Human Knowing 10, 29–50.Google Scholar
  6. Elmesky, R. and Tobin, K.: 2005, ‘Expanding our understandings of urban science education by expanding the roles of students as researchers“, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42, 807–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nieto, S.: 2002, The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities, New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  8. Roth, W.-M.: 2005, Doing qualitative research: Praxis of method, Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Roth, W.-M. and Middleton, D.: 2006, ‘Knowing what you tell, telling what you know: Uncertainty and asymmetries of meaning in interpreting graphical data“, Cultural Studies of Science Education 1, xx–yy.Google Scholar
  10. Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Elmesky, R., Carambo, C., McKnight, Y. and Beers, J.: 2004, ‘Re/making identities in the praxis of urban schooling: A cultural historical perspective“, Mind, Culture and Activity 11, 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sewell, W.H.: 1999, ‘The concept(s) of culture“, in V.E. Bonell and L. Hunt (eds.), Beyond the cultural turn (pp. 35–61). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Sewell, W.H.: 1992, ‘A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation“, American Journal of Sociology 98, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tobin, K.: 2005, ‘Building enacted science curricula on the capital of learners“, Science Education 89, 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tobin, K.: 2002, ‘Beyond the bold rhetoric of reform: (Re)Learning to teach science appropriately“, in W.-M. Roth and J. Desautels (eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 125–150). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  15. Tobin, K., Elmesky, R. and Seiler, G. (eds.).: 2005, Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban Education The Graduate Center CityUniversity of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations