Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correlation Between the PROMIS Pediatric Mobility Instrument and the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
HSS Journal ®

Abstract

Background

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an important resource for clinicians wishing to provide high-quality, patient-centered care. Finding PROMs to use in a pediatric clinical practice that are reliable, age appropriate, succinct, and not redundant is challenging.

Questions/Purposes

We sought to determine the degree of correlation between two pediatric PROMs, the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS) and the PROMIS Pediatric Mobility (PROMIS PM) instrument, when administered at patients’ initial visit. We hypothesized that there would be a positive correlation between the two questionnaires because of their focus on physical function.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional review of 294 pediatric patients (mean age, 13.7 years) with localized lower-extremity joint pathologies at our high-volume urban pediatric sports practice. The patients had been asked to complete both PROMs on a computerized platform.

Results

We found a positive and statistically significant—albeit modest—correlation between the scores obtained on the HSS Pedi-FABS and the PROMIS PM. Neither instrument significantly correlated with patient age, nor were floor and ceiling effects observed.

Conclusion

The study shows that although both PROM instruments provide valuable information about pediatric physical function, they are not redundant because they measure slightly different constructs. Future studies should further investigate the correlation between these questionnaires in specific subpopulations of pediatric patients with lower-extremity pathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amtmann D, Bamer A, Cook K, Harniss M, Johnson K. Adapting PROMIS physical function items for users of assistive technology. Disabil Health J. 2010;3(2):E9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anthony CA, Glass NA, Hancock K, Bollier M, Wolf BR, Hettrich CM. Performance of PROMIS instruments in patients with shoulder instability. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(2):449–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein DN, Mahmood B, Ketonis C, Hammert WC. A comparison of PROMIS physical function and pain interference scores in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: research collection versus routine clinical collection. Hand (N Y). 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944719831345.

  4. Brook EM, GK, Higgins LD, Matzkin EG. Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in your practice: pearls and pitfalls. Am J Orthop. 2017;46(6):273–278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dewitt EM, Stucky BD, Thissen D. Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: built using item response theory. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(7):794–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Edelen MO, Reeve BB. Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fabricant PD, Robles A, Downey-Zayas T, et al. Development and validation of a pediatric sports activity rating scale: the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS). Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(10):2421–2429.

  8. Fabricant PD, Robles A, McLaren SH, Marx RG, Widmann RF, Green DW. Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale predicts physical fitness testing performance. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(5):1610–1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fabricant PD, Suryavanshi JR, Calcei JG, Marx RG, Widmann RF, Green DW. The Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS): normative data. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(5):1228–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fedorak GT, Larkin K, Heflin JA, Xu J, Hung M. Pediatric PROMIS is equivalent to SRS-22 in assessing health status in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 12. [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003112.

  11. Gagnier JJ. Patient reported outcomes in orthopaedics. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(10):2098–2108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Intro to PROMIS. HealthMeasures. Northwestern University. 2019. Available at http://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis/intro-to-promis. Accessed 30 August 2019.

  13. Irwin DE, Gross HE, Stucky BD. Development of six PROMIS pediatrics proxy-report item banks. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khechen B, Patel DV, Haws BE, et al. Evaluating the concurrent validity of PROMIS Physical Function in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000786.

  15. Lim CR, Harris K, Dawson J, Beard DJ, Fitzpatrick R, Price AJ. Floor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set. BMJ Open. 2015;5(7):e007765.

  16. Makhni EC, Meldau JE, Blanchett J, et al. Correlation of PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients in the ambulatory sports medicine clinic. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7(6):2325967119851100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nwachukwu BU, Beck EC, Chapman R, Chahla J, Okoroha K, Nho SJ. Preoperative performance of the PROMIS in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7(7):2325967119860079. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119860079.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Owen RJ, Khan AZ, McAnany SJ, Peters C, Zebala LP. PROMIS correlation with NDI and VAS measurements of physical function and pain in surgical patients with cervical disc herniations and radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;1–6. [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.4.SPINE18422.

  19. Owen RJ, Zebala LP, Peters C, McAnany S. PROMIS Physical Function Correlation With NDI and mJOA in the surgical cervical myelopathy patient population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(8):550–555.

  20. PROMIS. HealthMeasures. Northwestern University. 2019. Available at http://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis. Accessed 22 August 2019.

  21. PROMIS Instrument Development and Psychometric Evaluation Scientific Standards. Version 2.0 (revised May 2013). HealthMeasures. Northwestern University. 2019. Available at http://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/PROMISStandards_Vers2.0_Final.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2017.

  22. Quinn H, Thissen D, Liu Y. Using item response theory to enrich and expand the PROMIS pediatric self report banks. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2014;12:160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodday AM, Graham RJ, Weidner RA, Rothrock NE, Dewalt DA, Parsons SK. Leveraging pediatric PROMIS item banks to assess physical functioning in children at risk for severe functional loss. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Waljee JF, Carlozzi N, Franzblau LE, Zhong L, Chung KC. Applying the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System to assess upper extremity function among children with congenital hand differences. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(2):200e–207e.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Weldring T, Smith SM. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights. 2013;6:61–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yee TJ, Smith BW, Joseph JR, et al. Correlation between the Oswestry Disability Index and the 4-item short forms for physical function and pain interference from PROMIS. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;9:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.5.SPINE19400.

Download references

Funding

The study was funded by the Hospital for Special Surgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter D. Fabricant MD, MPH.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Joshua Adjei, BA, Jonathan Schachne, BA, and Peter D. Fabricant, MD, MPH, declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Daniel W. Green MD, MS, FACS, FAAP, reports receiving intellectual property royalties from Arthrex, Inc., and Pega Medical; consulting fees from Arthrex, Inc.; and publishing royalties and financial or material support from Wolters Kluwer Health and Current Opinion in Pediatrics, outside the submitted work.

Human/Animal Rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was waived from all patients included in this study.

Required Author Forms

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Additional information

Level of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adjei, J., Schachne, J., Green, D.W. et al. Correlation Between the PROMIS Pediatric Mobility Instrument and the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS). HSS Jrnl 16 (Suppl 2), 311–315 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-019-09726-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-019-09726-7

Keyword

Navigation