In Patients with Early-Onset Scoliosis, Can Growing Rods Be Removed Without Further Instrumentation? An Evidenced-Based Review

Abstract

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is defined by the presence of spinal deformity in children 10 years of age or younger. Left untreated, patients with EOS are at high risk for thoracic insufficiency and early demise. This article provides a critical review of a recent prospective cohort study of children with EOS: “Graduation Protocol After Growing-Rod Treatment: Removal of Implants without New Instrumentation Is Not a Realistic Approach,” by Kocyigit and colleagues (J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(18):1554–1564). Treatment for EOS requires deformity correction while accommodating the growing spine. Dual growing rod implantation is a well-described technique that consists of the placement of two telescoping rods anchored to vertebrae proximal and distal to the apex of the curve. Multiple lengthening procedures are then performed as the child grows. Management of the endpoint of growing rod treatment remains controversial, with high complication rates associated with final fusion. As an alternative to final fusion or implant retention, Kocyigit and colleagues examined the removal of growing rods without spinal fusion and found that this procedure resulted in substantial worsening of the deformity in nine out of ten patients. This treatment group was terminated on ethical grounds. We believe this important result demonstrates that the removal of implants without fusion is an unacceptable treatment strategy that leads to poor outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Akbarnia BA, Marks DS, Boachie-Adjei O, Thompson AG, Asher MA. Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study. Spine. 2005;30(17S):S46–S57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Akbarnia BA, Breakwell LM, Marks DS, et al. Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening. Spine. 2008;33(9):984–990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Andras LM, Joiner ERA, McCarthy RE, et al. Growing rods versus shilla growth guidance: better cobb angle correction and T1–S1 length increase but more surgeries. Spine Deform. 2015;3(3):246–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bess S, Akbarnia BA, Thompson GH, et al. Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of one hundred and forty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(15):2533–2543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cahill PJ, Marvil S, Cuddihy L, et al. Autofusion in the immature spine treated with growing rods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(22):E1199–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Choudhury MZB, Tsirikos AI, Marks DS. Early-onset scoliosis: clinical presentation, assessment and treatment options. Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(6):357–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dobbs MB, Weinstein SL. Infantile and juvenile scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(3):331–341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Flynn JM, Tomlinson LA, Pawelek J, Thompson GH, McCarthy R, Akbarnia BA. Growing-rod graduates: lessons learned from ninety-nine patients who completed lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(19):1745–1750.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gillingham BL, Fan RA, Akbarnia BA. Early onset idiopathic scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(2):101–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gomez JA, Lee JK, Kim PD, Roye DP, Vitale MG. “Growth friendly” spine surgery: management options for the young child with scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(12):722–727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jain A, Sponseller PD, Flynn JM, et al. Avoidance of “final” surgical fusion after growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(13):1073–1078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kocyigit IA, Olgun ZD, Demirkiran HG, Ayvaz M, Yazici M. Graduation protocol after growing-rod treatment: removal of implants without new instrumentation is not a realistic approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(18):1554–1564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lenke LG. Long-term effects of instrumented fusion in growing children. In: Akbarnia BA, Yazici M, Thompson GH, editors. The Growing Spine: Management of Spinal Disorders in Young Children. Berlin: Springer; 2016. p. 535–545.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    McCarthy RE, Luhmann S, Lenke L, McCullough FL. The Shilla growth guidance technique for early-onset spinal deformities at 2-year follow-up: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mehta M. Growth as a corrective force in the early treatment of progressive infantile scoliosis. Bone Joint J. 2005;87(9):1237–1247.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Poe-Kochert C, Shannon C, Pawelek JB, et al. Final fusion after growing-rod treatment for early onset scoliosis: is it really final? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(22):1913–1917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sanders JO. Casting for early onset scoliosis. In: Akbarnia BA, Yazici M, Thompson GH, editors. The Growing Spine: Management of Spinal Disorders in Young Children. Berlin: Springer; 2016. p. 529–536.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Skaggs DL, Guillaume T, El-Hawary R, Emans J, Mendelow M, Smith J. Early onset scoliosis consensus statement: SRS Growing Spine Committee, 2015. Spine Deform. 2015;3(2):107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yang S, Andras LM, Redding GJ, Skaggs DL. Early-onset scoliosis: a review of history, current treatment, and future directions. Pediatrics. 2016;137(1):e20150709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony S. Shen MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Tony S. Shen, MD, William Schairer, MD, and Roger Widmann, MD, declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human/Animal Rights

N/A

Informed Consent

N/A

Required Author Forms

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 1226 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 1224 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, T.S., Schairer, W. & Widmann, R. In Patients with Early-Onset Scoliosis, Can Growing Rods Be Removed Without Further Instrumentation? An Evidenced-Based Review. HSS Jrnl 15, 201–204 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-019-09671-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • growing rods
  • early-onset scoliosis
  • infantile idiopathic scoliosis
  • congenital scoliosis
  • juvenile idiopathic scoliosis