Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Mobile Phone Text Messaging Platform Improves Collection of Patient-Reported Post-operative Pain and Opioid Use Following Orthopedic Surgery

  • Opioid Prescribing and Pain Management / Original Article
  • Published:
HSS Journal ®

Abstract

Background

Prospective collection of patient-reported opioid consumption and pain levels post-surgically may hold value in highlighting solutions related to the opioid crisis. Traditional methods for collecting patient-reported outcomes after surgery, such as paper surveys, often have poor response rates, and electronic messaging may offer more convenience and therefore yield more robust data.

Questions/Purposes

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a novel mobile phone short message service (SMS) platform would lead to better patient response rates to surveys on pain and opioid use than data-collection tools.

Methods

An SMS text messaging platform was created and implemented between September 2017 and May 2018 at an orthopedic specialty hospital. The purpose was to collect reports on opioid consumption and pain levels twice a day for 6 weeks post-surgery from patients who had undergone total hip or knee arthroplasty or a single-level lumbar microdiscectomy or decompression spine surgery. Patients who responded to fewer than 50% of the text messages were excluded.

Results

Our mobile phone text messaging platform was used by 183 patients, demonstrating a significantly higher response rate (96.1%) than our institution’s post-operative email registry capture, as well as the majority of published response rates for post-operative outcomes captured through electronic and traditional data-collection systems. Response rate remained consistently high among the various surgeons and across patients, regardless of age.

Conclusions

This application of a widely available technology can improve the measurement of post-operative patient-reported outcomes. Such data can in turn be used in the development of strategies to reduce post-operative opioid use. The adoption of novel technologies at a patient level will play a key role in combating the opioid epidemic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berman A, Figueroa ME, Storey JD. Use of SMS-based surveys in the rapid response to the Ebola outbreak in Liberia: opening community dialogue. J Health Commun. 2017;22(sup1):15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bream E, Charman SC, Clift B, Murray D, Black N. Relationship between patients’ and clinicians’ assessments of health status before and after knee arthroplasty. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):e6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2018 Annual Surveillance Report of Drug-Related Risks and Outcomes—United States. Surveillance Special Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. August 31, 2018. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/pdf/pubs/2018-cdc-drug-surveillance-report.pdf.

  4. Christie A, Dagfinrud H, Dale Ø, Schulz T, Hagen KB. Collection of patient-reported outcomes—text messages on mobile phones provide valid scores and high response rates. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Doyle R, Albright K, Hurley LP, Chávez C, Stowell M, Dircksen S, et al. Patient perspectives on a text messaging program to support asthma management: a qualitative study. Health Promot Pract. 2018;1524839918770209.

  6. Fang M, Noiseux N, Linson E, Cram P. The effect of advancing age on total joint replacement outcomes. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015;6(3):173–179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon N. Solution corner: a question of response rate. Science Editor. 2002;25(1):25.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gostin LO, Hodge JG, Noe SA. Reframing the opioid epidemic as a national emergency. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1539–1540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson TP, Wislar JS. Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys. JAMA. 2012;307(17):1805–1806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kjellsson G, Clarke P, Gerdtham U-G. Forgetting to remember or remembering to forget: a study of the recall period length in health care survey questions. J Health Econ. 2014;35:34–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nota SPFT, Strooker JA, Ring D. Differences in response rates between mail, e-mail, and telephone follow-up in hand surgery research. Hand (NY). 2014;9(4): 504–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pew Research Center. Mobile fact sheet. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science and Technology. 2017 Jan 12. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/.

  13. Sabatino MJ, Kunkel ST, Ramkumar DB, Keeney BJ, Jevsevar DS. Excess opioid medication and variation in prescribing patterns following common orthopaedic procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(3):180–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh JA, Lewallen DG. Time trends in the characteristics of patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66(6):897–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Volkow ND, McLellan TA, Cotto JH, Karithanom M, Weiss SRB. Characteristics of opioid prescriptions in 2009. JAMA. 2011;305(13):1299–1301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wells N, Pasero C, McCaffery M. Improving the quality of care through pain assessment and management. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2658/.

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by a Hospital for Special Surgery surgeon-in-chief grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Premkumar MD, MPH.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Jeffrey G. Stepan, MD, Msc, Cynthia A. Kahlenberg, MD, and Jason L. Blevins, MD, declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Ajay Premkumar, MD, MPH, and Francis C. Lovecchio, MD, report a surgeon-in-chief grant from the Hospital for Special Surgery in support of this study. Todd J. Albert, MD, reports personal fees from Biomet, FacetLink, Gentis, JP Medical Publishers, Saunders/Mosby-Elsevier, United Healthcare, and Thieme; grants and personal fees from DePuy; stock ownership in ASIP, Biometrix, Breakaway Imaging, Crosstree, FacetLink, Gentis, In ViVo Therapeutics, Paradigm Spine, Spinicity, and Vertech; salary from Weill-Cornell Medical College (professor) and Hospital for Special Surgery (surgeon-in-chief); non-financial support from Scoliosis Research Society (president), Cervical Spine Research Society (past-president), American Orthopaedic Association; grants from AO Foundation/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, International Spine Study Group, and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, all outside the submitted work. Michael B. Cross, MD, reports personal fees from Link Orthopaedics, Smith & Nephew, and Zimmer; personal fees and research support from Acelity, Exactech, Inc., and Flexion Therapeutics; stock or stock options from Imagen, Insight Medical, and Parvizi Surgical Innovation; and personal fees, research support, and stock or stock options from Intellijoint, all outside the submitted work.

Human/Animal Rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in this study.

Required Author Forms

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Additional information

Level of Evidence: IV

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 1.19 MB)

ESM 2

(PNG 1.51 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Premkumar, A., Lovecchio, F.C., Stepan, J.G. et al. A Novel Mobile Phone Text Messaging Platform Improves Collection of Patient-Reported Post-operative Pain and Opioid Use Following Orthopedic Surgery. HSS Jrnl 15, 37–41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-018-9635-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-018-9635-3

Keywords

Navigation