Bell et al.’s “Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Data from a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study” compared the accuracy of a robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using the MAKO Robotic Interactive Orthopedic Arm (RIO) system to a conventional UKA using standardized instrumentation. This review examines the authors’ findings and their relevance to clinical practice. Bell et al. conclude that the MAKO RIO system leads to more accurate implantation of both the tibial and femoral components in UKA in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes. This well-designed, level I study suggests what many arthroplasty surgeons assume about robotic assistance, which admittedly is of unknown clinical significance at this time. Evaluating this article in the context of the current literature provides valuable insight into areas in need of future investigation. The effect of implant positioning on long-term clinical outcomes and implant survivorship remains unclear. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to determine the role of robotic-assisted arthroplasty in the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Bell SW, Young P, Drury C, et al. Component rotational alignment in unexplained painful primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014;21(1):272–277.
Bell SW, Anthony I, Jones B, MacLean A, Rowe P, Blyth M. Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(8):627–635.
Chassin EP, Mikosz RP, Andriacchi TP, Rosenberg AG. Functional analysis of cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11(5):553–559.
Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, et al. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(2):188–197.
Dunbar NJ, Roche MW, Park BH, Branch SH, Conditt MA, Banks SA. Accuracy of dynamic tactile-guided unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(5):803–808. e1.
Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Hoeffel DP, et al. Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(416, 416):111–119.
Insall J, Aglietti P. A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(8):1329–1337.
Isaac S, Barker K, Danial I, Beard D, Dodd C, Murray D. Does arthroplasty type influence knee joint proprioception? A longitudinal prospective study comparing total and unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee. 2007;14(3):212–217.
Jeer PJ, Cossey AJ, Keene GC. Haemoglobin levels following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: influence of transfusion practice and surgical approach. Knee. 2005;12(5):358–361.
Lang JE, Mannava S, Floyd AJ, et al. Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(10):1296–1299.
Laskin RS. Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):182–185.
Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Clin Orthop. 1991;273:151–156.
Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1, 135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69(5):469–474.
Lisowski L, Meijer L, van den Bekerom M, Pilot P, Lisowski A. Ten-to 15-year results of the Oxford Phase III mobile unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2016;98(10 Supple B):41–47.
Moschetti WE, Konopka JF, Rubash HE, Genuario JW. Can robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty be cost-effective? A Markov decision analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(4):759–765.
Niinimäki T, Eskelinen A, Mäkelä K, Ohtonen P, Puhto A, Remes V. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survivorship is lower than TKA survivorship: a 27-year Finnish registry study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(5):1496–1501.
Price A, Webb J, Topf H, Dodd C, Goodfellow J, Murray D. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(8):970–976.
Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, McGlynn FJ. Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(3):408–412.
van der List, Jelle P, Sheng DL, Kleeblad LJ, Chawla H, Pearle AD. Outcomes of cementless unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee. 2017;24(3):497–507.
Conflict of Interest
Ryan C. Rauck, MD, and Jason Blevins, MD, declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Michael Cross, MD, reports receiving personal fees from Acelity, Acelity Surgical Advisory Board, Exactech, Intellijoint Surgical, Link Orthopaedics, Smith and Nephew, Theravance Biopharma, and Zimmer Biomet, outside the submitted work, and is on the editorial or governing boards of Bone and Joint 360, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Techniques in Orthopaedics.
Required Author Forms
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Rauck, R.C., Blevins, J.L. & Cross, M.B. Component Placement Accuracy in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Improved with Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Will It Have an Effect on Outcomes?. HSS Jrnl 14, 211–213 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9593-1
- unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
- robotic assistance