In Vivo Plantar Pressures in Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Compared to Control Using an Intraoperative Pedobarographic Device

Abstract

Background

Intraoperative pedobarography has the potential to aid surgical decisions, but no parameters exist to guide its use.

Questions/Purposes

This study compared supine plantar pressures between flatfoot patients and controls using a previously validated intraoperative pedobarographic device and examined associations between supine, walking, and standing plantar pressures.

Methods

Ten preoperative patients with stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) were compared to ten healthy controls. Supine plantar pressures were assessed using the pedobarographic device. Standing and walking plantar pressures were assessed with an EMED-XT sensor array (Novel). Maximum force (MF) and peak pressure (PP) were calculated for nine anatomical foot regions adjusting for age and BMI.

Results

No differences in plantar pressures were found between flatfoot patients and controls in the supine or standing positions. During walking, flatfoot patients had greater MF of the first, second, and third metatarsals (p ≤ 0.018) and greater PP of the first and second metatarsals than controls (p ≤ 0.010). Supine MF and PP were both strongly positively correlated with their respective pressure measurements for both standing and walking in multiple foot regions (p ≤ 0.05, all analyses). Correlations in the first metatarsal region were generally weak and not statistically significant.

Conclusion

This device did not show differences in supine plantar pressures of flatfoot patients and healthy subjects, highlighting the limitations of intraoperative devices in guiding flatfoot correction. The differences between flatfoot and controls during walking and the correlations between supine and walking conditions suggest that dynamic plantar pressures are a more useful parameter in guiding flatfoot reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. 1.

    Abousayed MM, Tartaglione JP, Rosenbaum AJ, Dipreta JA. Classifications in Brief: Johnson and Strom Classification of Adult-acquired Flatfoot Deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474: 588-593. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4581-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM, Liboshi A. Pressure Distribution under Symptom-Free Feet during Barefoot Standing. Foot Ankle Int. 1987; 7: 262-278. doi:10.1177/107110078700700502.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chan JY, Greenfield ST, Soukup DS, Do HT, Deland JT, Ellis SJ. Contribution of Lateral Column Lengthening to Correction of Forefoot Abduction in Stage IIb Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity Reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2015. doi: 10.1177/1071100715596607.

  4. 4.

    Conti MS, Chan JY, Do HT, Ellis SJ, Deland JT. Correlation of Postoperative Midfoot Position With Outcome Following Reconstruction of the Stage II Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2015. doi: 10.1177/1071100714564217.

  5. 5.

    Deland JT, Page A, Sung I-H, O’Malley MJ, Inda D, Choung S. Posterior tibial tendon insufficiency results at different stages. HSS J Musculoskelet J Hosp Spec Surg. 2006; 2: 157-160. doi:10.1007/s11420-006-9017-0.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ellis SJ, Hillstrom H, Cheng R, Lipman J, Garrison G, Deland JT. The development of an intraoperative plantar pressure assessment device. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30: 333-340. doi:10.3113/FAI.2009.0333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ellis SJ, Stoecklein H, Yu JC, Syrkin G, Hillstrom H, Deland JT. The accuracy of an automasking algorithm in plantar pressure measurements. HSS J Musculoskelet J Hosp Spec Surg. 2011; 7: 57-63. doi:10.1007/s11420-010-9185-9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Haleem AM, Pavlov H, Bogner E, Sofka C, Deland JT, Ellis SJ. Comparison of Deformity with Respect to the Talus in Patients with Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction and Controls Using Multiplanar Weight-Bearing Imaging or Conventional Radiography. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2014; 96: e63. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Imhauser CW, Siegler S, Abidi NA, Frankel DZ. The effect of posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction on the plantar pressure characteristics and the kinematics of the arch and the hindfoot. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon. 2004; 19: 161-169. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Johnson KA, Strom DE. Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction. Clin Orthop. 1989;196–206.

  11. 11.

    Matheis EA, Spratley EM, Hayes CW, Adelaar RS, Wayne JS. Plantar measurements to determine success of surgical correction of Stage IIb adult acquired flatfoot deformity. J Foot Ankle Surg Off Publ Am Coll Foot Ankle Surg. 2014; 53: 562-566. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2014.03.020.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Menz HB, Fotoohabadi MR, Munteanu SE, Zammit GV, Gilheany MF. Plantar pressures and relative lesser metatarsal lengths in older people with and without forefoot pain. J Orthop Res. 2013; 31: 427-433. doi:10.1002/jor.22229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Menz HB, Munteanu SE, Zammit GV, Landorf KB. Foot structure and function in older people with radiographic osteoarthritis of the medial midfoot. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010; 18: 317-322. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2009.11.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. A protocol for classifying normal- and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009; 2: 22. doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Richter M. Technique for Intraoperative Use of Pedography. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2006; 5: 88-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Richter M, Frink M, Zech S, et al. Intraoperative Pedography: A Validated Method for Static Intraoperative Biomechanical Assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27: 833-842. doi:10.1177/107110070602701014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Richter M, Zech S. Is intraoperative pedography helpful in clinical use--preliminary results of 100 cases from a consecutive, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study. Foot Ankle Surg Off J Eur Soc Foot Ankle Surg. 2009; 15: 198-204. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2009.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Richter M, Zech S. Leonard J. Goldner Award 2009: Intraoperative Pedobarography Leads to Improved Outcome Scores: A Level I Study. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30: 1029-1036. doi:10.3113/FAI.2009.1029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Saltzman CL, El-Khoury GY. The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int. 1995; 16: 572-576.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Schuh R, Salzberger F, Wanivenhaus AH, Funovics PT, Windhager R, Trnka H-J. Kinematic changes in patients with double arthrodesis of the hindfoot for realignment of planovalgus deformity. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc. 2013; 31: 517-524. doi:10.1002/jor.22269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Younger AS, Sawatzky B, Dryden P. Radiographic Assessment of Adult Flatfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26: 820-225. doi:10.1177/107110070502601006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aoife MacMahon BA.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Aoife MacMahon, BA, Howard J. Hillstrom, PhD, Jeremy Y. Chan, MD, and Scott J. Ellis, MD, have declared that they have no conflict of interest. Huong T. Do, MA, reports grants from Clinical and Translational Science Center, outside the work. Jonathan T. Deland, MD, reports personal fees from Arthrex, Zimmer, and Integra and personal fees and other from Tornier, outside the work.

Human/Animal Rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Required Author Forms

Required Author Forms Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Additional information

Level of Evidence: Level III: prospective case-control study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 1224 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacMahon, A., Hillstrom, H.J., Do, H.T. et al. In Vivo Plantar Pressures in Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Compared to Control Using an Intraoperative Pedobarographic Device. HSS Jrnl 13, 136–145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9542-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • intraoperative pedobarography
  • adult-acquired flatfoot deformity