Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Considerations for Prophylactic Surgery in Asymptomatic Severe Cervical Stenosis

Review Article

  • Cervical Spine Symposium
  • Published:
HSS Journal ®

Abstract

Background

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a devastating pathology that can severely impair quality of life. The symptoms in CSM progress slowly and often do not manifest until they become severe and potentially irreversible. There is a consensus that surgical intervention is warranted in symptomatic patients. The recovery of the neurologic deficit after surgical decompression of the spinal cord varies, and halting the progression of the disease remains the principle aim of surgery.

Questions/Purposes

The aim of this review is to address the key question of whether or not to intervene in cases that have radiographic evidence of significant cervical stenosis yet are asymptomatic or exhibit minimal symptoms?

Methods

The PubMed databases for publications that addressed asymptomatic cervical spondylotic myelopathy were reviewed. The relevant articles were selected after screening all the resulting abstracts. The references of the relevant articles were then reviewed, and cross references with titles discussing CSM were picked up for review.

Results

The search identified 14 papers which were reviewed. Seven articles were found to be relevant to the subject in question. Going through the references of the relevant articles, three articles were found to be directly related to the topic in study.

Conclusion

There is paucity of evidence to support for or against surgery in the setting of asymptomatic cervical spondylotic myelopathy despite radiographic evidence of severe stenosis. Patient factors such as age, level of activity, and risk of injury should be considered in formulating a management plan. Moreover, the patient should play an integral role in the process of decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson DG, Sayadipour A, Limthongkul W, et al. Traumatic central cord syndrome: neurologic recovery after surgical management. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead, NJ). 2012; 41(8): E104-E108.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bednarik J, Kadanka Z, Dusek L, et al. Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical cord compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(20): 2260-2269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Hadden T. Cervical laminectomy and dendate ligament section cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord. 1991; 4: 286-295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72(8): 1178-1184.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boden SD, Dodge LD, Bohlman HH, Rechtine GR. Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine. A long-term analysis with predictors of paralysis and recovery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75(9): 1282-1297.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chad G, Ball MD, Andrew W, Kirkpatrick MD, David R, Williams MD. Prophylactic surgery prior to extended-duration space flight: is the benefit worth the risk? Can J Surg. 2012; 55(2): 125-131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiles BW III, Leonard MA, Choudhri HF, Cooper PR. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery. 1999; 44(4): 762-769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke E, Robinson PK. Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1956; 79: 483-510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Emery SE. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001; 9: 376-388.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fehlings MG, Barry S, Kopjar B, et al. Anterior vs posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: outcomes of the Prospective Multicenter AOSpine North America CSM study in 264 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013.

  11. Furlan JC, Kalsi-Ryan S, Kailaya-Vasan A, et al. Functional and clinical outcomes following surgical treatment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study of 81 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 14: 348-355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hukuda S, Mochizuki T, Ogata M, Schichikawa K, Shimomura Y. Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of the results of anterior and posterior procedures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1985; 67B: 609-615.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kadaňka Z, Bednarík J, Vohánka S, et al. Conservative treatment versus surgery in spondylotic cervical myelopathy: a prospective randomized study. Eur Spine J. 2000; 9(6): 538-544.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kadaňka Z, Bednařík J, Novotný O, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(9): 1533-1538.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanchiku T, Taguchi T, Kaneko K, et al. A correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological findings in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(13): E294-E299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaptain GJ, Simmons NE, Replogle RE, et al. Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 2000; 93: 199-204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee F, Turner JWA. Natural history and prognosis of cervical spondylosis. BMJ. 1963; 2: 1607-1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lenehan B, Boran S, Street J, et al. Demographics of acute admissions to a National Spinal Injuries Unit. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(7): 938-942.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Taketomi E, Komiya S. Clinical course of patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a minimum 10-year cohort study. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100(3 Suppl Spine): 245-248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nurick S. The pathogenesis of spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972; 95: 87-100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ranawat CS, O’Leary P, Pellicci P, et al. Cervical spine fusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979; 61-A: 1003-1010.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rhee JM, Shamji MF, Erwin MW, et al. Nonoperative management of cervical myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine (Phila pa 1976). 2013.

  23. Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis JD, et al. Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy. A prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review. Spine. 2000; 25: 670-676.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Teresi LM, Lufkin RB, Reicher MA, et al. Asymptomatic degenerative disk disease and spondylosis of the cervical spine: MR imaging. Radiology. 1987; 164(1): 83-88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Whiteson JH, Panaro N, Ahn JH, Firooznia H. Tetraparesis following dental extraction: a case report and discussion of preventiove measures for cervical spinal hyperextension injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 1997; 20(4): 422-425.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Conflict of Interest

Abdel Majid Sheikh Taha, MD, Jennifer Shue, MS, and Darren Lebl, MD have declared that they have no conflict of interest. Federico Girardi, MD reports pending patents with Centinel Spine, LP, Ethicon, LANX, Inc., LDR Spine, USA, Inc., LifeSpine, Inc., Orthogem, Ltd., Paradigm Spine, LLC, Pioneer Surgical, Scient’x USA, Small Bone Innovations, LLC, Spinal Kinetics, Spineart USA, Spineview Inc., Wenzel Spine, Inc.; receives royalties for a patent with DePuy Spine, Inc., NuVasive, Inc., Ortho Development Corp., Healthpoint Capital Partners, outside the work.

Human/Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.

Informed Consent

N/A

Required Author Forms

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine and Scoliosis Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA

    Abdel Majid Sheikh Taha MD, Jennifer Shue MS, Darren Lebl MD & Federico Girardi MD

  2. Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA

    Abdel Majid Sheikh Taha MD, Darren Lebl MD & Federico Girardi MD

Authors
  1. Abdel Majid Sheikh Taha MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer Shue MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Darren Lebl MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Federico Girardi MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdel Majid Sheikh Taha MD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 4

(PDF 1225 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheikh Taha, A.M., Shue, J., Lebl, D. et al. Considerations for Prophylactic Surgery in Asymptomatic Severe Cervical Stenosis. HSS Jrnl 11, 31–35 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-014-9426-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-014-9426-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation