Advertisement

HSS Journal ®

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 252–255 | Cite as

Outpatient Surgery as a Means of Cost Reduction in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case-Control Study

  • Michael AynardiEmail author
  • Zachary Post
  • Alvin Ong
  • Fabio Orozco
  • Dean C. Sukin
Original Article

Abstract

Background

The current healthcare market coupled with expedited recovery and improvements in analgesia have led to the development of total hip arthroplasty being performed as an outpatient procedure in selected patients.

Questions/Purposes

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes and cost-effectiveness of traditional inpatient THA with outpatient hip replacement at the same facility.

Patients and Methods

This observational, case-control study was conducted from 2008 to 2011. One hundred nineteen patients underwent outpatient THA through a direct anterior approach. These cases were all performed by a single surgeon. Outpatient cases were then compared to inpatient hospital controls performed by the same surgeon at the inpatient hospital facility.

Results

Complications, length of stay, demographic data, and overall costs were compared between groups. There was no difference in complications or estimated blood loss between groups. Most notably, the average overall cost in the outpatient setting was significantly lower than inpatient, $24,529 versus $31,327 (p = 0.0001).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that appropriately selected patients can undergo THA in an outpatient setting with no increase in complications and at a substantial savings to the healthcare system.

Keywords

Hip arthroplasty Outpatient Cost Outcome 

Notes

Disclosures

Conflict of Interest:

Michael Aynardi, MD, Zachary Post, MD, and Dean C. Sukin, MD have declared that they have no conflict of interest. Alvin Ong, MD reports personal fees from Stryker and Smith and Nephew, outside the work. Fabio Orozco, MD reports personal fees from Stryker, outside the work.

Human/Animal Rights:

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).

Informed Consent:

Informed consent was waived from all patients for being included in the study.

Required Author Forms

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Supplementary material

11420_2014_9401_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 1224 kb)
11420_2014_9401_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 2 (PDF 1224 kb)
11420_2014_9401_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 3 (PDF 1224 kb)
11420_2014_9401_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 4 (PDF 1224 kb)
11420_2014_9401_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 5 (PDF 1224 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini RM, Della Valle C, Paprosky W, Rosenberg AG. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 429: 239-247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berger R, Sanders S, Thill E, Sporer S, Della VC. Newer anesthesia and rehabilitation protocols enable outpatient hip replacement in selected patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467: 1424-1430.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bertin KC. Minimally invasive outpatient total hip arthroplasty: a financial analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 435: 154-163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bozic K, Saleh K, Rosenberg A, Rubash H. Economic evaluation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19: 180-189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghomrawi H, Schackman B, Mushlin A. Appropriateness criteria and elective procedures: total joint arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 2467-2469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Husted H, Holm G. Predictors of length of stay and patients satisfaction after hip and knee replacement surgery: fast track experience in 712 patients. Acta Orthop. 2008; 79(20): 168-173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 780-785.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nuelle DG, Mann K. Minimal incision protocols for anesthesia, pain management, and physical therapy with standard incisions in hip and knee arthroplasties: the effect on early outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22: 20-25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosencher N, Kerkkamp HE, Macheras G, et al. Orthopedic Surgery Transfusion Hemoglobin European Overview (OSTHEO) study: blood management in elective knee and hip arthroplasty in Europe. Transfusion. 2003; 43: 459-469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Unlu E, Eksioglu E, Aydog E, Aydog ST, Atay G. The effect of exercise on hip muscle strength, gait speed and cadence in patients with total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2007; 21: 706-711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Walker WC, Keyser-Marcus LA, Cifu DX, Chaudhri M. Inpatient interdisciplinary rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty surgery: a comparison of revision and primary total hip arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 129-133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Aynardi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zachary Post
    • 1
  • Alvin Ong
    • 1
  • Fabio Orozco
    • 1
  • Dean C. Sukin
    • 1
  1. 1.Orthopaedic SurgeryThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations