HSS Journal ®

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 117–123 | Cite as

The Use of Biologic DMARDS Identifies Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with More Optimistic Expectations of Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Susan M. Goodman
  • Lisa A. Mandl
  • Mark Figgie
  • Beverly K. Johnson
  • Michael Alexiades
  • Hassan Ghomrawi
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Preoperative expectations of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) correlate with postsurgical satisfaction, and are linked to outcomes. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and other chronic diseases, may lower expectations, although new biologic medications have greatly enhanced patients’ quality of life.

Questions/Purposes

The purpose of this study is to compare preoperative expectations of RA to those of matched osteoarthritis (OA) patients undergoing TKA, and examine the subset of RA on biologic DMARD therapy.

Methods

For a cross-sectional study, RA and OA identified from an institutional TKA registry were matched on age, sex, prior TKA, and preoperative function. Expectations were measured using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Expectations Survey. Expectations and quality of life measures were assessed preoperatively and scores were compared between RA and OA.

Results

One hundred fourteen RA cases, 46.5% on biologics, were matched to 228 OA cases. The average expectations score was not significantly lower for RA compared to OA (72.9 ± 20.7 vs. 77.2 ± 18.3, p = 0.040. RA on biologics had expectations similar to OA (total expectation score 76.3 ± 18.1 vs. 77.4 ± 17.4, p = 0.71), while RA not on biologics had expectations that were significantly lower (69.9 ± 22.4 vs. 77.1 ± 19.0, p = 0.03).

Conclusion

Use of biologics in RA patients was associated with higher expectations, similar to those of OA patients, but the effect on outcomes is not known. Further studies should assess the effect of higher expectations in RA patients on outcomes.

Keywords

expectations arthroplasty rheumatoid arthritis osteoarthritis 

Supplementary material

11420_2014_9380_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 1(PDF 1224 kb)
11420_2014_9380_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 2(PDF 1224 kb)
11420_2014_9380_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 3(PDF 1224 kb)
11420_2014_9380_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 4(PDF 1225 kb)
11420_2014_9380_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 5(PDF 1224 kb)
11420_2014_9380_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 6(PDF 1225 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bellamy N. Instruments to assess osteoarthritis—current status and future needs. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995; 9: 692-693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benoni AC, Bremander A, Nilsdotter A. Patient-reported outcome after rheumatoid arthritis-related surgery in the lower extremities: a report from the swedish national register of rheuma surgery (RAKIR). Acta Orthop. 2012; 2: 179-184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 6: 740-747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Culliford DJ, Maskell J, Beard DJ, et al. Temporal trends in hip and knee replacement in the United Kingdom: 1991 to 2006. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 1: 130-135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 6: 613-619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fransen M, Edmonds J. Reliability and validity of the EuroQol in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999; 9: 807-813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Furst DE, Keystone EC, Braun J, et al. Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011; 2012: i2-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed N. Patient expectations predict greater pain relief with joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 5: 716-721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Predicting patient dissatisfaction following joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 2008; 12: 2415-2418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hekmat K, Jacobsson L, Nilsson JA, et al. Decrease in the incidence of total hip arthroplasties in patients with rheumatoid arthritis—results from a well-defined population in south Sweden. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011; 2: R67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hepinstall MS, Rutledge JR, Bornstein LJ, et al. Factors that impact expectations before total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 6: 870-876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Himanen AK, Belt E, Nevalainen J, et al. Survival of the AGC total knee arthroplasty is similar for arthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Finnish arthroplasty register report on 8,467 operations carried out between 1985 and 1999. Acta Orthop. 2005; 1: 85-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hurst NP, Jobanputra P, Hunter M, et al. Validity of EuroQol: a generic health status instrument–in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Economic and health outcomes research group. Br J Rheumatol. 1994; 7: 655-662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kapetanovic MC, Lindqvist E, Saxne T, et al. Orthopaedic surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 20 years: prevalence and predictive factors of large joint replacement. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008; 10: 1412-1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lieberman JR, Thomas BJ, Finerman GA, et al. Patients’ reasons for undergoing total hip arthroplasty can change over time. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 1: 63-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002; 6: 1273-1279.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mancuso CA, Graziano S, Briskie LM, et al. Randomized trials to modify patients’ preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 2: 424-431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mancuso CA, Jout J, Salvati EA, et al. Fulfillment of patients’ expectations for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 9: 2073-2078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Salvati EA. Patients with poor preoperative functional status have high expectations of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 7: 872-878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, et al. Patients’ expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 7: 1005-1012.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    March LM, Barcenilla AL, Cross MJ, et al. Costs and outcomes of total hip and knee joint replacement for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2008; 10: 1235-1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Massardo L, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, et al. A population-based assessment of the use of orthopedic surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2002; 1: 52-56.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nelissen RG. The impact of total joint replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003; 5: 831-846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Osnes-Ringen H, Kvien TK, Henriksen JE, et al. Orthopaedic surgery in 255 patients with inflammatory arthropathies: longitudinal effects on pain, physical function, and health-related quality of life. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 10: 1596-1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Petterson SC, Mizner RL, Stevens JE, et al. Improved function from progressive strengthening interventions after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial with an imbedded prospective cohort. Arthritis Rheum. 2009; 2: 174-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pincus T, Sokka T, Kautiainen H. Patients seen for standard rheumatoid arthritis care have significantly better articular, radiographic, laboratory, and functional status in 2000 than in 1985. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 4: 1009-1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Poultsides LA, Ghomrawi HM, Lyman S, Aharonoff GB, Mancuso CA, Sculco TP. Change in preoperative expectations in patients undergoing staged bilateral primary total knee or total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rech J, Hess A, Finzel S, et al. Association of brain functional magnetic resonance activity with response to tumor necrosis factor inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013; 2: 325-333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saleh KJ, Mulhall KJ, Bershadsky B, et al. Development and validation of a lower-extremity activity scale. Use for patients treated with revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 9: 1985-1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scharloo M, Kaptein AA, Weinman J, et al. Illness perceptions, coping, and functioning in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and psoriasis. J Psychosom Res. 1998; 5: 573-585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Strand V, Singh JA. Improved health-related quality of life with effective disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: Evidence from randomized controlled trials. Am J Manag Care. 2008; 4: 234-254.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Studenic P, Radner H, Smolen JS, et al. Discrepancies between patients and physicians in their perceptions of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Arthritis Rheum. 2012; 9: 2814-2823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 6: 473-483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Weiss RJ, Stark A, Wick MC, et al. Orthopaedic surgery of the lower limbs in 49,802 rheumatoid arthritis patients: results from the Swedish national inpatient registry during 1987 to 2001. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006; 3: 335-341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Westby MD. Rehabilitation and total joint arthroplasty. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012; 3: 489-508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yoo JH, Chang CB, Kang YG, et al. Patient expectations of total knee replacement and their association with sociodemographic factors and functional status. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 3: 337-344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan M. Goodman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lisa A. Mandl
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mark Figgie
    • 3
    • 4
  • Beverly K. Johnson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael Alexiades
    • 3
    • 4
  • Hassan Ghomrawi
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Division of RheumatologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Division of RheumatologyHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.Division of Health Policy, Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA
  6. 6.Hospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations