HSS Journal ®

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 153–166 | Cite as

Tarsal Coalitions: Radiographic, CT, and MR Imaging Findings

  • David A. Lawrence
  • Michael F. Rolen
  • Andrew H. Haims
  • Zakaria Zayour
  • Hicham A. Moukaddam
Review Article

Abstract

Background

Tarsal coalitions affect up to 13% of the population and can be a cause of chronic ankle and hindfoot pain. They can be subdivided as osseous, cartilaginous, or fibrous types, each with unique radiographic, CT, and MR imaging findings. In particular, MR imaging offers the unique ability to determine the exact type of tarsal coalition that is present as well as whether any associated soft tissue abnormalities are present.

Questions/Purposes

The purposes of this paper were to (1) review the anatomy of the hindfoot; (2) review the radiographic, CT, and MR imaging findings of tarsal coalitions; and (3) review the imaging appearance of the specific types of tarsal coalitions.

Methods

Online searches were performed using Google Scholar with the search criteria of “tarsal coalition,” “hindfoot anatomy,” and “subtalar coalition,” and limiting the searches to papers published in the last 10 years in major radiology journals.

Results

The anatomy of the hindfoot is complex but essential to understand. There are various radiographic, CT, and MR imaging findings that can be consistently noted in cases of tarsal coalition. The specific types of tarsal coalition demonstrate characteristic imaging findings.

Conclusions

Knowledge of the normal anatomy of the foot, in particular the hindfoot, combined with the knowledge of the imaging characteristics of different histologic subtypes of coalitions (osseous, cartilaginous, and fibrous) is essential for interpreting radiographic, CT, and MR images of the ankle and foot.

Keywords

tarsal coalition subtalar coalition calcaneonavicular coalition 

Supplementary material

11420_2013_9379_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 1(PDF 1.19 MB)
11420_2013_9379_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 2(PDF 291 kb)
11420_2013_9379_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 3(PDF 1.19 MB)
11420_2013_9379_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 4(PDF 1.19 MB)
11420_2013_9379_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 5(PDF 1.19 MB)

References

  1. 1.
    Bohne WH. Tarsal coalition. Current Opinion in Pediatrics. 2001; 13: 29-35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown RR, Rosenberg ZS, Thornhill BA. The C sign: more specific for flatfoot deformity than subtalar coalition. Skeletal Radiology. 2001; 30: 84-87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Conway JJ, Cowell HR. Tarsal coalition: clinical significance and roentgenographic demonstration. Radiology. 1969; 92: 799-811.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crim J. Imaging of tarsal coalition. Radiologic Clinics of North America. 2008; 46: 1017-1026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crim JR, Kjeldsberg KM. Radiographic diagnosis of tarsal coalition. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2004; 182: 323-328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Donovan A, Rosenberg ZS. MRI of ankle and lateral hindfoot impingement syndromes. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2010; 195: 595-604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Downey MS. Tarsal coalitions. A surgical classification. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 1991; 81: 187-197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gardner E, Gray DJ, O’Rahilly R. The prenatal development of the skeleton and joints of the human foot. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume. 1959; 41-A: 847-876.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harris BJ. Anomalous structures in the developing human foot. Anat Rec. 1955; 121: 399.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harris RI. Rigid valgus foot due to talocalcaneal bridge. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume. 1955; 37-A: 169-183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris RI, Beath T. Etiology of peroneal spastic flat foot. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume. 1948; 30B: 624-634.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leonard MA. The inheritance of tarsal coalition and its relationship to spastic flat foot. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume. 1974; 56B: 520-526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Linklater J, Hayter CL, Vu D, Tse K. Anatomy of the subtalar joint and imaging of talo-calcaneal coalition. Skeletal Radiology. 2009; 38: 437-449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu PT, Roberts CC, Chivers FS, et al. “Absent middle facet”: a sign on unenhanced radiography of subtalar joint coalition. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology. 2003; 181: 1565-1572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Manaster BJ. Diagnostic imaging. Musculoskeletal: non-traumatic disease. Salt Lake City: Amirsys, 2010.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mosier KM, Asher M. Tarsal coalitions and peroneal spastic flat foot. A review. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume. 1984; 66: 976-984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nalaboff KM, Schweitzer ME. MRI of tarsal coalition: frequency, distribution, and innovative signs. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases. 2008; 66: 14-21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Newman JS, Newberg AH. Congenital tarsal coalition: multimodality evaluation with emphasis on CT and MR imaging. Radiographics: A Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2000; 20:321–332; quiz 526–327, 532.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pastore D, Cerri GG, Haghighi P, Trudell DJ, Resnick DL. Ligaments of the posterior and lateral talar processes: MRI and MR arthrography of the ankle and posterior subtalar joint with anatomic and histologic correlation. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology. 2009; 192: 967-973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perlman MD, Wertheimer SJ. Tarsal coalitions. The Journal of Foot Surgery. 1986; 25: 58-67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Resnick D. Talar ridges, osteophytes, and beaks: a radiologic commentary. Radiology. 1984; 151: 329-332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rios AM, Rosenberg ZS, Bencardino JT, Rodrigo SP, Theran SG. Bone marrow edema patterns in the ankle and hindfoot: distinguishing MRI features. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology. 2011; 197: W720-729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Bencardino JT. From the RSNA Refresher Courses. Radiological Society of North America. MR imaging of the ankle and foot. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2000; 20 spec no:S153–179.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sijbrandij ES, van Gils AP, de Lange EE, Sijbrandij S. Bone marrow ill-defined hyperintensities with tarsal coalition: MR imaging findings. European Journal of Radiology. 2002; 43: 61-65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Slomann H. On coalition calcaneo-navicularis. J Orthop Surg. 1921; 3: 586-602.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Solomon LB, Ruhli FJ, Taylor J, Ferris L, Pope R, Henneberg M. A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet. Journal of Orthopaedic Research: Official Publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society. 2003; 21: 352-358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stormont DM, Peterson HA. The relative incidence of tarsal coalition. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1983;28–36.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Talkhani I, Laing P. Cuboid-navicular coalition in an adult: a case report. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 1999; 5: 151-154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Lawrence
    • 1
  • Michael F. Rolen
    • 1
  • Andrew H. Haims
    • 1
  • Zakaria Zayour
    • 2
  • Hicham A. Moukaddam
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.School of MedicineAmerican University of BeirutBeirutLebanon
  3. 3.LimaUSA

Personalised recommendations