HSS Journal ®

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 36–44 | Cite as

Evaluation and Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection–an International, Multicenter Study

  • Saseendar Shanmugasundaram
  • Benjamin F. Ricciardi
  • Timothy W. R. Briggs
  • Patrick S. Sussmann
  • Mathias P. Bostrom
Original Article



Controversies still exist regarding the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in patients with prosthetic joint infections (PJI).


How effective are preoperative and intraoperative cultures in isolating organisms and how do these culture results compare to one another? What are the results of surgical treatment of PJI in the hip and knee in an international, tertiary referral center cohort?

Patients and Methods

One hundred sixteen patients (N = 59 hip PJI, N = 57 knee PJI) were recruited prospectively to registries at three international, tertiary referral centers between December 2008 to November 2011. Retrospective review of prospective registry data including demographics, microbiology results, and operative reports was performed.


Preoperative synovial fluid aspiration yielded an organism in only 45.2% and 44.4% of cases, respectively, for knee and hip PJI. False-negative rates of preoperative aspiration relative to intraoperative culture were 56% and 46% in hip and knee PJI, respectively, with discordance rates of 25% and 21.4%, respectively. Rates of negative intraoperative cultures were 15% in hip PJI and 20.7% in knee PJI. Open debridement with prosthetic retention was the most common initial revision procedure performed (48.3% of hip PJI and 63.8% of knee PJI). This method of revision was successful in 41.3% of hip PJI and 59.4% of knee PJI. Initial failure rates for prosthetic revision was lower than debridement with prosthetic retention but remained substantial in both hip PJI (initial success of one-stage exchange 60% and two-stage exchange 70%) and knee PJI (initial success of one-stage exchange 80% and two-stage exchange 75%).


Diagnosis and treatment of PJI remains challenging with difficulty in isolating the offending organism and with high rates of prosthetic revision and initial treatment failures. Future advances in organism isolation and international standardization of treatment protocols may improve patient outcomes.


prosthetic joint infection single-stage revision arthroplasty two-stage revision arthroplasty prosthetic joint aspiration synovial fluid culture 

Supplementary material

11420_2013_9366_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 1(PDF 1224 kb)
11420_2013_9366_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 2(PDF 1224 kb)
11420_2013_9366_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 3(PDF 1224 kb)
11420_2013_9366_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 4(PDF 1224 kb)
11420_2013_9366_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 5(PDF 1224 kb)


  1. 1.
    Azzam KA, Seeley M, Ghanem E, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Irrigation and debridement in the management of prosthetic joint infection: traditional indications revisited. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(7): 1022-1027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrack RL, Harris WH. The value of aspiration of the hip joint before revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1993; 75-A: 66-76.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berbari EF, Marculescu C, Sia I, et al. Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 45(9): 1113-1119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charnley J. A clean-air operating enclosure. British J Surg. 1964; 51: 202-205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clohisy JC, Calvert G, Tull F, McDonald D, Maloney WJ. Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 429: 188-192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science, NY. 1999; 284(5418): 1318-1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crockarell JR, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Morrey BF. Treatment of infection with débridement and retention of the components following hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80(9): 1306-1313.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cuckler JM. The infected total knee: management options. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(4 suppl 2): 33-36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deirmengian C, Greenbaum J, Stern J, et al. Open debridement of acute gram-positive infections after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 416: 129-134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Paprosky WG. Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22: 90-93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Della Valle CJ, Zuckerman JD, Di Cesare PE. Periprosthetic sepsis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 420: 26-31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eftekhar NS. Postoperative wound infection. In Total Hip Arthroplasty. Vol. 2, pp. 1457–1504. St. Louis, C. V. Mosby, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fitzgerald RH, Peterson LFA, Washington JA, Van Scoy RE, Coventry MB. Bacterial colonization of wounds and sepsis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1973; 55-A: 1242-1250.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haddad FS, Muirhead-Allwood SK, Manktelow AR, Bacarese-Hamilton I. Two-stage uncemented revision hip arthroplasty for infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82(5): 689-694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hanssen AD, Rand JA. Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1999; 48: 111-122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hernigou P, Flouzat-Lachianette CH, Jalil R, Batista SU, Guissou I, Poignard A. Treatment of infected hip arthroplasty. The Open Orthopaedics Journal. 2010; 4: 126-131.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hughes SP, Dash CH, Benson MK, Field CA. Infection following total hip replacement and the possible prophylactic role of cephaloridine. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. 1978; 23(1): 9-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ince A, Rupp J, Frommelt L, Katzer A, Gille J, Lohr JF. Is "aseptic" loosening of the prosthetic cup after total hip replacement due to nonculturable bacterial pathogens in patients with low-grade infection? Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39(11): 1599-1603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kalore NV, Gioe TJ, Singh JA. Diagnosis and management of infected total knee arthroplasty. Open Orthop J. 2011; 5: 86-91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kotelnicki J, Mitts K. Surgical treatments for patients with an infected total knee arthroplasty. JAAPA. 2009; 22(11): 40-46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koyonos L, Zmistowski B, Della Valle CJ, Parvizi J. Infection control rate of irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(11): 3043-3048.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lachiewicz PF, Rogers GD, Thomason HC. Aspiration of the hip joint before revision total hip arthroplasty. Clinical and laboratory factors influencing attainment of a positive culture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78(5): 749-754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leone JM, Hanssen AD. Management of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(10): 2335-2348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Osmon DR. Prosthetic joint infection diagnosed postoperatively by intraoperative culture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 439: 38-42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moyad TF, Thornhill T, Estok D. Evaluation and management of the infected total hip and knee. Orthopedics. 2008; 31(6): 581-588.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mulcahy DM, Fenelon GC, McInerney DP. Aspiration arthrography of the hip joint. Its uses and limitations in revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11: 64-68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Müller M, Morawietz L, Hasart O, Strube P, Perka C, Tohtz S. Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection following total hip arthroplasty – Evaluation of the diagnostic values of pre- and intraoperative parameters and the associated strategy to preoperatively select patients with a high probability of joint infection. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2008; 3: 31.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pandey R, Berendt AR, Athanasou NA. Histological and microbiological findings in non-infected and infected revision arthroplasty tissues. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. Oxford Skeletal Infection Research and Intervention Service. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000; 120(10): 570-574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pandey R, Drakoulakis E, Athanasou NA. An assessment of the histological criteria used to diagnose infection in hip revision arthroplasty tissues. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1999; 52(2): 118-123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Parvizi J, Adeli B, Zmistowski B, Restrepo, Greenwald AS. Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Current Knowledge: AAOS Exhibit Selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94(14):e104 1–9.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Sharkey P, Aggarwal A, Burnett RS, Barrack RL. Diagnosis of infected total knee: findings of a multicenter database. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(11): 2628-2633.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson M. Infection in total knee replacement: a retrospective review of 6489 total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;15–23.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rao N, Crossett LS, Sinha RK, Le Frock JL. Long-term suppression of infection in total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 414: 55-60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Roberts P, Walters AJ, McMinn DJ. Diagnosing infection in hip replacements. The use of fine-needle aspiration and radiometric culture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74: 265-271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sculco TP. The economic impact of infected joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1995; 18: 871-873.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mf S, Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(9): 1869-1875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Segreti J, Nelson JA, Trenholme GM. Prolonged suppressive antibiotic therapy for infected orthopedic prostheses. Clin Infect Dis. 1998; 27(4): 711-713.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shih LY, Wu JJ, Yang DJ. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein values in patients with total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1987; 225: 238-246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, O’Connell JX, Duncan CP. Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(5): 672-683.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Spangehl MJ, Younger ASE, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Diagnosis of infection following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79: 1578-1588.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Squire MW, Della Valle CJ, Parvizi J. Preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: role of aspiration. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196(4): 875-879.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tietjen R, Stinchfield FE, Michelsen CB. The significance of intracapsular cultures in total hip operations. Surg, GynecAnd Obstet. 1977; 144: 699-702.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tigges S, Stiles RG, Meli RJ, Roberson JR. Hip aspiration: a cost-effective and accurate method of evaluating the potentially infected hip prosthesis. Radiology. 1993; 189: 485-488.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Toulson C, Walcott-Sapp S, Hur J, et al. Treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty with a 2-stage reimplantation protocol: update on "our institution’s" experience from 1989 to 2003. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Oct; 24(7): 1051-1060.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tsukayama DT, Goldberg VM, Kyle R. Diagnosis and management of infection after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(Suppl 1): S75-80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tunney MM, Patrick S, Gorman SP, et al. Improved detection of infection in hip replacements. A currently underestimated problem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(4): 568-572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vessely MB, Whaley AL, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Berry DJ. Long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 452: 28-34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yoo JJ, Kwon YS, Koo KH, Yoon KS, Kim YM, Kim HJ. One-stage cementless revision arthroplasty for infected hip replacements. Int Orthop. 2009; 33(5): 1195-1201.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saseendar Shanmugasundaram
    • 1
  • Benjamin F. Ricciardi
    • 2
  • Timothy W. R. Briggs
    • 3
  • Patrick S. Sussmann
    • 4
  • Mathias P. Bostrom
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryIndira Gandhi Medical College and Research InstitutePuducherryIndia
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryLondon Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service, Royal National Orthopaedic HospitalStanmoreUK
  4. 4.Department of Orthopedic SurgerySchulthess KlinikZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations