Evaluation and Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection–an International, Multicenter Study
- First Online:
Controversies still exist regarding the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in patients with prosthetic joint infections (PJI).
How effective are preoperative and intraoperative cultures in isolating organisms and how do these culture results compare to one another? What are the results of surgical treatment of PJI in the hip and knee in an international, tertiary referral center cohort?
Patients and Methods
One hundred sixteen patients (N = 59 hip PJI, N = 57 knee PJI) were recruited prospectively to registries at three international, tertiary referral centers between December 2008 to November 2011. Retrospective review of prospective registry data including demographics, microbiology results, and operative reports was performed.
Preoperative synovial fluid aspiration yielded an organism in only 45.2% and 44.4% of cases, respectively, for knee and hip PJI. False-negative rates of preoperative aspiration relative to intraoperative culture were 56% and 46% in hip and knee PJI, respectively, with discordance rates of 25% and 21.4%, respectively. Rates of negative intraoperative cultures were 15% in hip PJI and 20.7% in knee PJI. Open debridement with prosthetic retention was the most common initial revision procedure performed (48.3% of hip PJI and 63.8% of knee PJI). This method of revision was successful in 41.3% of hip PJI and 59.4% of knee PJI. Initial failure rates for prosthetic revision was lower than debridement with prosthetic retention but remained substantial in both hip PJI (initial success of one-stage exchange 60% and two-stage exchange 70%) and knee PJI (initial success of one-stage exchange 80% and two-stage exchange 75%).
Diagnosis and treatment of PJI remains challenging with difficulty in isolating the offending organism and with high rates of prosthetic revision and initial treatment failures. Future advances in organism isolation and international standardization of treatment protocols may improve patient outcomes.
Keywordsprosthetic joint infection single-stage revision arthroplasty two-stage revision arthroplasty prosthetic joint aspiration synovial fluid culture
- 2.Barrack RL, Harris WH. The value of aspiration of the hip joint before revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1993; 75-A: 66-76.Google Scholar
- 12.Eftekhar NS. Postoperative wound infection. In Total Hip Arthroplasty. Vol. 2, pp. 1457–1504. St. Louis, C. V. Mosby, 1993.Google Scholar
- 13.Fitzgerald RH, Peterson LFA, Washington JA, Van Scoy RE, Coventry MB. Bacterial colonization of wounds and sepsis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1973; 55-A: 1242-1250.Google Scholar
- 27.Müller M, Morawietz L, Hasart O, Strube P, Perka C, Tohtz S. Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection following total hip arthroplasty – Evaluation of the diagnostic values of pre- and intraoperative parameters and the associated strategy to preoperatively select patients with a high probability of joint infection. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2008; 3: 31.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Pandey R, Berendt AR, Athanasou NA. Histological and microbiological findings in non-infected and infected revision arthroplasty tissues. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. Oxford Skeletal Infection Research and Intervention Service. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000; 120(10): 570-574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Parvizi J, Adeli B, Zmistowski B, Restrepo, Greenwald AS. Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Current Knowledge: AAOS Exhibit Selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94(14):e104 1–9.Google Scholar
- 32.Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson M. Infection in total knee replacement: a retrospective review of 6489 total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;15–23.Google Scholar
- 40.Spangehl MJ, Younger ASE, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Diagnosis of infection following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79: 1578-1588.Google Scholar
- 42.Tietjen R, Stinchfield FE, Michelsen CB. The significance of intracapsular cultures in total hip operations. Surg, GynecAnd Obstet. 1977; 144: 699-702.Google Scholar
- 44.Toulson C, Walcott-Sapp S, Hur J, et al. Treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty with a 2-stage reimplantation protocol: update on "our institution’s" experience from 1989 to 2003. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Oct; 24(7): 1051-1060.Google Scholar