HSS Journal ®

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 230–234 | Cite as

Caution Should be Taken in Performing Surgical Hip Dislocation for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Patients Over the Age of 40

  • G. R. Boone
  • M. R. Pagnotto
  • J. A. Walker
  • R. T. Trousdale
  • R. J. Sierra
Current Topics Concerning Joint Preservation and Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip

Abstract

Background

Open and arthroscopic procedures are treatment options for patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Age has been found to be a predictive factor in the outcome of patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for hip dysplasia. It is unclear if older age contraindicates joint preservation through a surgical hip dislocation (SHD).

Questions/Purpose

The purpose of this retrospective case series was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients over 40 years of age without radiographic evidence of end-stage arthritis who underwent SHD for the treatment of FAI and to determine whether older age should be a contraindication for joint-preserving procedures in these patients. Our specific aims included (1) documenting the intraoperative findings and procedures, (2) assessing pain relief provided, and (3) assessing treatment failures and postoperative complications, noting the number of patients that ultimately required total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Patients and Methods

All patients at age 40 and older who had SHD for the treatment of FAI were identified from a series of patients treated with SHD. Clinical notes, radiographs, and operative reports were reviewed to determine clinical results, complications, and the need for additional procedures. The minimum follow-up was 1 year (mean 3.9 years; range 1–8 years).

Results

At final follow-up, 11/22 (50%) of hips had pain relief, while 11/22 (50%) either continued having significant symptoms or required THA. Five (23%) reported nontrochanteric pain symptoms that were the same or worse than before surgery, and six hips (27%) underwent subsequent THA). The average time between SHD and THA was 1.9 years (0.9–6.2). The average age of patients who went on to require THA was 45 (42–50) years.

Conclusions

Surgical hip dislocation can be used for the treatment of FAI in patients over age 40, but strict selection criteria should be adhered to, as only half of the patients experienced significant improvement in their hip pain. THA was required in one-third of hips for continued pain and radiographic progression of arthritis. SHD for treatment of pathology that is not amenable to hip arthroscopy should remain a surgical option in older patients with FAI only if joint degeneration is not present.

Keywords

hip offset femoracetabular impingement joint preservation surgical hip dislocation 

References

  1. 1.
    Beaule PE, Le Duff MJ, Zaragoza E. Quality of life following femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty for femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:773–779.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jul;87(7):1012-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, Boutier V, Wyss D, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:67–73. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaulé PE, Kim YJ, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, Leunig M, Schoenecker PL, Millis MB. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90 Suppl 4:47-66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clohisy JC, St John LC, Schutz AL. The surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(2):555–564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Espinosa N, Rothenfluh DA, Beck M, Ganz R, Leunig M. Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:925–935.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Berlemann U. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1119-1124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Gill T, Ganz R. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82(5):679-683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laude F, Sariali E, Nogier A. Femoroacetabular impingement treatment using arthroscopy and anterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:747–752.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Lebon CJ, Moysan P, Jamart J, Maldague BE. MR imaging of the acetabular labrum: variations in 200 asymptomatic hips. Am J Roetgenol. 1996;167(4):1025-1028.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matheney T, Kim YJ, Zurakowski D, Matero C, Millis M. Intermediate to long-term results following the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy and predictors of clinical outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2113-2123. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matsuda DK, Carlisle JC, Arthurs SC, Wierks CH, Philippon MJ. Comparative systematic review of the open dislocation, mini-open, and arthroscopic surgeries for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(2):252-269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Millis MB, Kain M, Sierra R, Trousdale R, Taunton MJ, Kim YJ, Rosenfeld SB, Kamath G, Schoenecker P, Clohisy JC. Periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia in patients older than 40 years: a preliminary study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep;467(9):2228-34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murphy S, Tannast M, Kim YJ, Buly R, Millis MB. Debridement of the adult hip for femoroacetabular impingement: indications and preliminary clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:178–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peters CL, Erickson JA. Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement with surgical dislocation and debridement in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(8):1735-1741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Philllipon MJ, Maxwell RB, Johnston TL, Schenker M, Briggs KK. Clinical presentation of femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(8):1041-1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Philippon MJ, Stubbs AJ, Schenker ML, Maxwell RB, Ganz R, Leunig M. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: osteoplasty technique and literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1571–1580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pierannunzii L, d'Imporzano M. Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a modified resection osteoplasty technique through an anterior approach. Orthopedics. 2007;30:96–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT. Labral reconstruction using the ligamentum teres capitis: report of a new technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):753–759.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sink EL, Beaule PE, Sucato D., Young-Jo K, Millis MB, Dayton M, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, Zaltz I, Schoenecker P, Monreal A, Clohisy JC. Multicenter study of complications following dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(12):1132-1136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tannast M, Siebenrock KA. Open therapy of femoroacetabular impingement. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010;22:3-16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. R. Boone
    • 1
  • M. R. Pagnotto
    • 2
  • J. A. Walker
    • 2
  • R. T. Trousdale
    • 2
  • R. J. Sierra
    • 2
  1. 1.Mayo Medical SchoolRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Mayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations